there is no such thing as “the best film” (ranking everything for no reason is probbaly the most unforgivable Murican sin) but there are films watchable by Whites, and what deserves a great bonfire
1) It is necessary to privilege European cinema from before the mid-80s which remained racially monochromatic, unlike Jewish Wood which had already imposed as an obligatory figure the usual “there are some good one” nigger (model created by Sidney Poitier and this repugnant film “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” (demonstrating that white America had capitulated morally in the 50s), to stick to the great project of desegregation which was the condition for Eisenhower’s United States to have the “moral” leadership to oppose the Soviet empire.
2) for the post-85 period, european cinema is generally aligned with its california (((cousins))) so the advice would be to look at the name of the director or producer and to throw out anything that has a polish or german sounding name
red flags: besides obviously any film including a black man in the lead role, even if he dies in the first quarter of an hour while showing his teasing friendship with the white hero (the one who will fuck the admiring woman), any woman in the main character (empowerment in slow motion), any jew whose name is written directly on the poster and not in the end credits
i would add one after having had glimpses of ridley scott’s calamitous “Napoléon”: throw away before consumption any production by a director who is over 70 years old. Films directors are NOT like great wines that become better after aging People of that age are already too inhabited by their own end to be able to produce anything meaningful. At best they will repeat and parody themselves
this is particularly the case with ridley scott when we compare with this pure masterpiece that he had made on the napoleonic era, and which was one of his first films
https://youtu.be/l2KWTEhyVX8
(yes I know Keitel is a (((tribeman))) but exceptions confirm the rule, rather than deny it, as everyone knows)
(in any case, cinema is a very overrated leisure activity, privilege – especially with children – literature which frees the imagination compared to the captive swallowing of animated images)
.
