Agree or Disagree

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #18954
    Alumnus
    Participant

    How much Economically Communist and How much Dictatorially Atheistic?

    #18913
    Hunter
    Participant

    @Spartan, I take it you are thinking of East Germany, or perhaps Belarus? Regarding Belarus, it is one country that I seriously considered immigrating to, before reconsidering given the geopolitical circumstances… Belarus has to be the last White (although, not Aryan, Slavic) country with a regime that is not anti-White. So I can see the appeal. Historically, Strasserism comes the closest to an actual ‘White communism,’ but never held any land after their failed coup. Strasser supposedly privately enjoyed homosexual activities, so it is possible that his ‘White communist dictatorship’ would have been socially-liberal, certainly more-so than Stalin’s dictatorship. Also, I’ll point out that, ‘multi-racial capitalistic democracy,’ if it could ever be said to exist, is temporary. Multi-racialism destroys democracy, and ultimately, so does ‘capitalism.’ That is, if you include the black market within capitalism. The Synagogue used ‘evil’ to capture and/or replace the elite class in the UK and then the USA. This resulted in the creation of the ‘Federal Reserve’ and from this unlimited control of money, they now owned ‘capitalism,’ in the same way a casino is owned. Then they bought the media, and the rest is history.

    #18910
    GreatDane
    Participant

    Agree regarding a White ethno-state as a _guiding principle_ / purpose of the state. The word “Communism” is a bit of a utopia, so would more just call it authoritarian/totalitarian/fascist/corporatist. Hopefully reletively benevolent and with some “freedoms” as long as they don’t pose any danger to said _guiding principle_. Could even have some element of democracy, free speech and private economic enterprice. China and Iran have some real-life aspects of this. Third Reich would have had to fine-tune/experiment with these aspects as well. Also a self-electing body like a Council of Guardians in Iran or CPSU or NSDAP would have the ultimate say regaring if something would fit within the guiding ideology (and of course ruthlessly eleminate anything deemed a threat).

    #18907
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It depends in what capacity we are speaking. If we are taking this historically I would also pick the communist option as a people who remains pure can more easily break free from the chains of tyrant than a mixed group, and tyrannical regimes always fail. Also, multicultural democracy is just a precursor/ code name for communism. However, if the question is which I would prefer to live in conceptually I choose multicultural domacracy. A state wide atheism is one of the worste things a society can be, and from the Christian perspective it is the worst. Also, communism has killed hundreds of millions of people through its history.

    #18906
    Ted
    Participant

    “Communist dictatorship” is an oxymoron: communism is supposed to be a stateless utopia that a socialist dictatorship voluntarily dissolves into. It looks like we’re talking about “socialism” here, a state that owns all the businesses.

    White people living under socialism probably looks a lot like Soviet East Germany; poorer, technologically behind, and more repressive compared to West Germany. However, multiracial multicultural capitalist countries are browning their way towards becoming Brazil, and starting to suffer the economic effects of increasing incompetence. (0.72 R-correlation value between average IQ and per capita GDP)

    White capitalist country: 1st world
    White socialist country: 2nd world
    Brown capitalist country: 3rd world

    America in current year is still a lot nicer than bread lines, gulags for mild dissent, not being allowed to leave, 35% of GDP spent on defense, and other characteristics of the USSR member countries. However, with the fate of Haiti, South Africa, Rhodesia, Detroit, and Baltimore as my guide, I think White-nationalist socialism would end up being nicer than the fruit of the Kalergi plan in the long run.

    TLDR: Disagree until it gets much shittier, which it’s expected to.

    #18902
    A_Spartan_Speaks
    Participant

    Would you agree or disagree with the following statement?

    I would much prefer to live in communist dictatorship that was a dedicated White ethno-state rather than live in a multi-racial, capitalistic democracy. Also, assume that the White ethno-state communist dictatorship is officially atheistic and the multi-racial capitalistic democracy allows freedom of worship for christians, jews, muslims, etc.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

SIGN INTO YOUR ACCOUNT CREATE NEW ACCOUNT

Your privacy is important to us and we will never rent or sell your information.

 
×
CREATE ACCOUNT ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?


 
×
FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?
×

Go up