[Alumnus]

Avoiding unpleasant emotions too much is self-harmful. Focusing too much on positive emotions is self-harmful. Both attracting and rejecting are good, when used in healthy measure. Teaching a focus on “positive” thinking, at the expense of “negative”, is sabotage.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uWqOHIS9gHUl/

[Anonymous]

Some level of selfishness is as necessary as some level of selflessness.

I think the key here is to determine what the ideal balance of these polarities would look like and strive towards that.

The same applies to striving for the ideal balance between all such polarities.

I think one way the “movement” could benefit is with redirecting some of the intention and energy away from the inform spectrum and channeling it into a positive and creative INSPIRE outlet.

We’re massively over-informed and, far too often, equally under-inspired.

Finding that perfect balance is daily struggle, but it is an essential process we must undertake together.

I hope we can all agree to dedicate ourselves to uplifting our people on the individual and collective level.

[AeonKnight]

@Hunter

Correct. Love, hate and fear are just descriptions and tools. Evil lies in the misuse (inversion) of a thing’s role. If you love something but don’t fear harm coming to it, nor hate those who would do it harm, you don’t love it at all. Extremely basic shit. Common sense dictates that OP’s original meaning was to not be consumed by inaction – or poor action – in the presence of fear and hate (and that in itself is the misuse I just mentioned), but if you don’t apply fear and hate correctly, or at all, you will lose.

[ItsNatural]

AryanAlpha, that was beautiful what you wrote and so true!

[Hunter]

People should be able to complain without offering a solution. Of course, if solutions can be offered (with good intent) they should be. However, if you deny people to ability to talk about problems, without already arriving at the solution, you frequently end the discussion. Quite often, in real life, there is no easy solution, if there is one at all. The transcendence of the White subspecies is one such ‘problem’ or objective. Consider DEATH, there are only two responses, fear or acceptance. Fear can lead to action in an attempt to avoid death, or paralysis that hastens death. Acceptance can lead one to think of legacy or suicide. Attraction, love, is another such problem. If you talk about it (as a man) you’ve already lost, since it implies you don’t have it, and to many (even men) if you don’t already have it you don’t deserve it. I’ll leave it at that. Really, there was never anything to discuss. One mind as well say, ‘what will be will be’ or ‘God(dess) wills it.’ Truly, all is fair in love and war. That is all I have to say on this topic of attraction.

I am who I am.

[Hunter]

Pro-White Whites must have some degree of natural disagreeableness (or disgust) as the current regime we live under is anti-White. Unfortunately, this disagreeableness persists even among groups of pro-White Whites, especially around sensitive topics, and as humans are a sexual species, there is no more sensitive topic than sex and love, and thus rarely can the truth be spoken plainly without disagreement. Alas, I wish pro-Whites would focus on what they can agree on rather than what they can’t… not that we shouldn’t be able to ‘talk’ about what we do disagree on. Just that we should value more-so what we can agree upon. Yet another wish I have.

[Hunter]

@Ralf, no you did not show me any ‘sympathy,’ only a not so veil’d personal attack. I only retaliated since I am not a pacifist doormat. I will return your own words back to you as they are amusingly applicable: thanks for proving my point insufferable prick, it’s not difficult to figure out why nobody loves you the answer lies within your thick skull.

Ah, now where were we? Love was it?

[Hunter]

Returning to the the OP, he is correct that we are operating from a position of (drum roll) FEAR! (and even HATE OY VEY) Unfortunately, in my case at least, it has always been rational fear (and HATE OY VEY), and everyone here who is not an enemy agent should also have some degree of rational fear (and HATE OY VEY), for our enemies are evil (wish us harm) and more powerful than ever before in history. Yet OP is right, we should nevertheless struggle to operate from a place of LOVE (for our own: pro-White Whites)… even if we have no real cause to, indeed, when I look at my past experiences, I have far more (reason) to hate, than love. Yet we always live in hope of better times or (if you’re lucky) that the good times would last. HATE is the shadow of LOVE’s light. Since we have love we hate what would deny us our love. ‘Negative’ emotions are not negative, they are emotional pain, and the purpose of pain is to correct action. HATE of what is EVIL (that which causes suffering with no greater gain) is sacred. ANGER is the emotional fire, it can be channeled to productive purposes. Do not fall for the enemy’s lies that HATE (OY VEY) and anger themselves are evil. They are not, when directed against EVIL (that which harms Whites, causes pointless suffering, and kills pleasure), they are righteous. We experience ‘negative’ emotions as a reminder that we are not in paradise, and that our struggle for the light continues.

[Anonymous]

@Hunter

Case in point.

I’ve shown nothing but sympathy for you, yet you act like an insufferable prick in return.

It’s not difficult to figure out why nobody loves you – the answer lies within your thick skull.

[Hunter]

I see that my post has struck a chord. That is because I wrote the truth.

@Aster, I agree that “women, at least for myself, (and also men) can’t help who they’re attracted to in a certain context.” This vague comment somewhat explains why feminism of any kind reduces or kills female attraction to men. With regards to selfishness, I agree and my comments are directed at the opening post. It is clear that (the vast majority of) women are generally not attracted to intelligence (let alone truth) itself, but results, the ‘material,’ or better put, power.

@Ralf since you have moved on to passive-aggressive personal attacks against my persona here despite largely agreeing with what I have said, I will say that you come across as quite an annoying man. Also, HELL YES I am angry at the state of the world, if you’re not, there is something wrong with you. As for being confrontational, I am the exact opposite IRL. It is only here I say my truth and to you that appears confrontational, I am not sorry.

“You complain about a lack of love, yet this very post of yours hasn’t a shred of love in it.” Who, pray tell, am I supposed to be loving here? Put another way, this is a public forum, and speaking the truth is love for the public. I say my mind here as much as possible since I rarely can anywhere else.

@AeonKnight, good commentary, it just goes to show how epic a mistake giving women power was for men. Give a woman power over you and she’ll only hate you for it, gain power over a woman and she’ll love you for it. Mother Nature is a harsh mistress.

[AeonKnight]

@Hunter

Your premises are not wrong, but I’ll offer a different conclusion:

“Did they build a matriarchy where no child was left unloved and where the mother was responsible for finding her son a wife? No, they did not. The majority of White women couldn’t care less about the majority of White men, or even their own sons, and that is the sad fact.”

That is the instinctual (however incomplete) female drive to “fix” society in the only way women can, consciously or not. They can only shun unfitness (physical, cognitive or behavioural) as they see it, and the more desperate the situation, the more “cruel” the lengths they’ll go to. 99% of women don’t even understand why they do it, and the remaining 1% cannot control it even if they do. Not to be too general, but selfishness and solidarity are synonyms, especially over time — at every point in time, decisions are already about the future: women suffer the consequences of the decisions they make “selfishly” (and so do men), because their purpose is the best statistical chance for the kids, not for themselves, not for their husbands, not for their “happiness”, etc. Both women and men ultimately delight in choices that are sacrifices, because it’s what is selected for (you’re gonna have an easier – and more probable – time making a choice prioritising fitness if you take pleasure in it, whether it objectively taxes you or not). I mean, is hybristophilia, or single-motherhood, or a dual mating-strategy, all which wreck women, selfish? They’re all objectively bad ideas regarding long-term civilisation buiilding, but circling back to the first point: making these choices is the only agency women CAN have.

“The only thing White men can do (to be more likely to be loved by women) is pursue and acquire power, but doing that collectively is obviously a threat to the powerful Jews that run society and their golem of feminism, thus any form of White solidarity is viciously attacked”

Yes, but it ties back to the argument that if men have to be “given” power, and be “allowed” to lead, whether it be by women or Jews, they are not worthy of it in the first place. It’s exponentially hard in modern society given ZOG legislations and centuries of social programing, but you can’t explain that to genes — might is right, full stop.

On your continuation about Jews: I agree. Jews have always provided Whites with opportunites for anti-fragility (now more than ever). Some of the traits we consider desirable, such as honour and honesty, are nerfed in inter-racial struggles. They are still virtuous, and should be preserved at all costs, I’m not discarding them, but they cease having a universal, 100% success rate, and that should be accounted for, or you’re playing the game with a disadvantage. It also doesn’t mean to stoop to their level, but coming up with strategies that actually work.

@Aster

I agree and I think projection overall is the main reason men and women don’t understand each other anymore — most people can only fathom attractiveness from their own point of view, not on what the other gender likes (and much less on what the other gender needs biologically, which is always gonna reign supreme in every decision). Individualism is partly to blame, but I’d argue that women are especially susceptible to it by virtue of how projection interacts with hypergamy (one example of many: women think that a man above her in sexual market value giving her attention means she’s on his level, and will from that point on reject anything below that man). Oversimplifying: women must come back to reality, and men must not resent women for what they are.

I still think we’re gonna make it, as the Jew plan is simply unfeasible.

White Power.

[Anonymous]

@Hunter

What I’m about to say is not meant to be demeaning, insulting or anything of this sort – rather it’s some information which could be useful to you, if you accept it.

I’ve been on this site for about a year now and as a consequence have been inadvertently reading your forum posts on occasion.

Now, I don’t know how you conduct yourself in your personal life, but in your posts you come across as a bitter, angry and confrontational man – which are personality traits which people avoid and thus do not make you “lovable”; quite the opposite in fact.

As what I see you do many times is complaining about this, that and the other, without focusing on any potential solutions to the challenges that you’re facing.

And I’m saying this from a place of sympathy, as we appear to share a similar history – which we however seem to be approaching in very different ways.

I myself do not complain about my lot – I accept it and move on.

Since there is no way for me to change what happened in the past or how people are treating me in the present, there is no point in whipping myself into a frenzy over it, as none of this anger will have any sort of productive outlet.

Rather, it is important to recognize that for our society to improve, we each need to try to be at our best behavior at all times, as the moment we worsen our own behavior because others treat(ed) us badly, we begin a race to the bottom, wherin every person treats the other worse as a result of what he himself experienced, and everything degenerates…

Or in brief:
You complain about a lack of love, yet this very post of yours hasn’t a shred of love in it.

How come?
Can’t expect to receive something you’re not giving, can you?

—

That was to address the first point you raised – though I did want to comment too on this claim of “women are selfish” which you raised as well.

While our experiences once again appear to align – as I myself haven’t been treated well by a single modern woman, in spite of (or perhaps because of) being nothing but polite and respectful to them – I do think claiming that only women are selfish is way off the mark.

Instead, in my experience, men are simply expressing their selfishness in different ways, with the most common one I’ve experienced being that a lot of men can’t stand being told that they’re wrong.

In fact, a lot of times they won’t even entertain the idea, even if well reasoned, as their ego is more important to them than figuring out the truth at the expense of it – which of course goes against the European spirit of scientific and philosophical exploration.

Based on what I’ve seen, it is likely that selfishness is the default for all people, and that it requires both high intelligence as well as a sizable chunk of self-work in order to recognize the drive for selfish behavior within us, and counteract it in times when it is unreasonable or irrational.

[Aster]

And maybe instead of “projected onto you,” you could say “to be inspired by you”

[Aster]

@Hunter You have to understand that women, at least for myself, (and also men) can’t help who they’re attracted to in a certain context, and on the internet the frequency of attraction will be much less so. Selfishness doesn’t have to be wrong, it can just be advancing one’s interests. And it seems like the internet is in large part projection; you kind of have to do it because you’re so far-removed from people. Women may not be finding something very attractive to project onto you in the online sphere, even though you are still worthy of love. Your “worthy-of-love” qualities aren’t very apparent to them.
I’m sorry about the situation with your parents.

[Hunter]

It is truly hard to operate ‘from a place of love’ when you have never received it (not even from my parents), despite constantly putting oneself ‘out there’ and constantly experiencing rejection, and that is my lived experience. I’m sure the latter, at least, is the case for most men over 30 on this website. This criticism of ‘selfishness’ is more appropriately aimed at women since they are the choosers, they decide who to give their love, and most men would reciprocate their love. After the Jews in positions of power, White women have been in control of White society since the success of first wave feminism. Did they build a matriarchy where no child was left unloved and where the mother was responsible for finding her son a wife? No, they did not. The majority of White women couldn’t care less about the majority of White men, or even their own sons, and that is the sad fact. The only thing White men can do (to be more likely to be loved by women) is pursue and acquire power, but doing that collectively is obviously a threat to the powerful Jews that run society and their golem of feminism, thus any form of White solidarity is viciously attacked… what White men can do is love White men and form syndicates that advance their collective individual interests, and wait for an opportunity (like the muslim brotherhood) to seize power. Yet, even this is obviously extremely difficult.

@AeonKnight pro-Whites should study the jews and adopt their practices (renamed and adapted) where good or necessary. The calendar used by the jews and the practices of kosher and the sabbath, for-example, have some merit. The Romans identified the jewish god as Saturn. The black cube is a symbol of Saturn as the apex of that planet has a permanent black hexagonal storm that can be represented as the black cube. The jews are genetically different though (even low-tech memetics could alter genetics over a long period of time) so some of their strength within White society comes as part of their ‘natural’ parasitic (and ultimately predatory) nature, not just their unique conditioning.

[AeonKnight]

I think regardless of the validity of things like the “Law of Attraction” and its synonyms (including subversions), Whites could benefit a lot from being more fanatic with our beliefs and morals. Jews are highly ritualistic and esoteric, and despite the efficacy of their practices, it has made them one of the most dominant forces even with both outer and ingroup shortcomings.

[Anonymous]

I thought it would be a beneficial exercise to undergo a process of self-reflection on the individual and group level from the perspective of the LAW OF ATTRACTION.

Let’s presume for a moment that we believe in the fundamental importance of this law for the sake of this exercise.

Are we as individuals and collectively living in a state of conscious awareness of the basic principles of the LAW OF ATTRACTION? What is our inner dialog like? Are we consciously focusing on the things we want to attract into our lives? Do we cultivate a positive outlook for the future? Crystallizing a perfect vision of want we want to see in ourselves, our community, and how we would like the world to be?

Are we operating from a place of LOVE? Love for ourselves, love for our people and their unlimited potential for good? Love for how amazing our lives and the world can and will be when we inevitably succeed? Working to be a source of light and inspiration for ourselves, our family, and our Folk? Striving to uplift each other individually and collectively?

Or are we operating from a position of FEAR? Focusing on how bad things are and how much worse they might become? Critical of ourselves and each other? Cynical, defeatist, selfishly caring only about our own success and advancement?

This also ties into what might become the subject for another topic and that is the raising of our frequency and vibration on the individual and collective level.

Before you come at me with the predictable “That’s bullshit hippie gibberish” detraction recall that even the hippie movement had its origins in something with the potential to be wholesome and positive before it was subverted and misdirected down a path of profane degeneracy.

The Lebensreform movement, which was the origin of what was subverted into the hippie movement in America, had many potentially positive takeaways. Some groups which emerged from völkisch Romanticism gradually became part of National Socialist ideology by the 1930s, known as ‘Blut und Boden’ (blood and soil).

Völkisch Romanticism contributed to that special variety of German thought which served as the seed bed for National Socialism.

I don’t consider myself an expert on these subjects but I find them interesting, compelling, and worthy of discussion and implementation.

Here is an interesting Link on Volkish Life Reform:

Volkish Life Reform

[Author]

Posts