[WhiteMan]

Any information on the status of the case against the Brown criminal who was pursuing, harassing, threatening, intimidating, her? Last I heard the police had indeed arrested him. I was wondering what the charges were and how the case has advanced. Whites need to publicize her White victory and the defeat of the Brown invader.

[Administrator]

@Dude – Touching the subject of ‘commerce,’ there is a lot to learn and to unlearn. In Germany, I know several commerce teachers and private men and women who have successfully played the system by its own rules and are left alone without getting harassed anymore for taxes, fees, parking tickets, insane social security dues, etc. I guess for North Americans it makes sense to look into the Freeman and Sovereign Citizen movement.

Here are Winston Shrout’s old teachings to give you an idea: https://www.youtube.com/user/WinstonShrout but it does not seem to have worked, as he ended up in prison. Nevertheless, his books are still sold on Ebay.

Annavonreitz.com wrote about Winston Shrout and his mistakes https://annavonreitz.com/aboutwinstonshrout.pdf

Von Reitz’ approach is different from the approach we have in Germany, where the state law of the SECOND German Reich seems to still exist but is so covered up that it rather makes sense to play by commercial rules. We make contracts using the natural person backed by the living human with a soul and try to avoid their nudging us into contracts identifying with a juridical person, a thing, and a corporation. We are not corporations; therefore, we should use the natural person where we can or sign for the juridical person where we must as A. R. ‘Authorized Representative,’ putting the juridical person at arm’s length from us and NOT identifying with it. It’s best you sign as ‘DOE, John’ using the natural person or as ‘John Doe A.R.’ using the juridical person, which is owned by its creator, the state, not you. The living man or woman with a soul signs with ‘john’/’jane’ (small letters) and/or their fingerprint. The living man can also make contracts under natural law, but natural law has no legislation defended by a governmental legal executive force. Natural law always needed to enforce itself, which nowadays is tricky, to say the least, being surrounded by governmental forces. The living man or woman is still officially free, but technically not, as they are mostly dependent on the system in one way or another. People who play their freeman card are also not defended by governmental forces; thus, the living man or woman is fully responsible for their actions and needs to organize themselves locally in real life to create a force for, for example, self-defense.

Wiki-lie-pedia, trying as usual to misinform, still gives insight into the respective movements:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redemption_movement#Winston_Shrout

and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement

and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsb%C3%BCrger_movement

Obviously, you need to do your own research to vet the sources. There are lots of fake protagonists trying to let people make mistakes. The best way is to do everything in writing, strictly and stoically following the rules of administrative processes, and to always stay polite, ask questions, wait for the deadlines to expire without the recipient’s response, and then conclude in writing to create FACTS.

Whenever someone asks you if you are the person John Doe, explain that you are the ‘living man john’ using (mostly not by your free will but systemically and forcefully) a person called John Doe, a name on paper, a fiction, but that you are a living being. A fiction and a living being cannot be identical.

That’s all I can say. The subject clearly explodes the capacity of a forum thread.

[JSC]

Hitler’s Prophecy: the total annihilation of the Jewry.

[A_Spartan_Speaks]

Ultimately, the desire for revenge is the most primal, and unstoppable of all human emotions; so what’s coming will make what the Nazis did look like complete, utter, absolute child’s play by comparison.

[Dude]

@Keymaster Liv

” And if a civil servant wants to interfere, ask them what their jurisdiction over the living man or woman is. Spoiler: They have none. If they doubt that you are a living human, make an oath and sign it with your first name in blue ink and with your thumbprint in red. They can’t top this, because working for the state, they can only act as a person on the commercial law level. As a side note, it is possible to drag civil servants and politicians into private law to make them privately liable for their actions based on (y)our previously provided terms and conditions. This requires a formal and finished administrative process containing three or four letters with a final declaration of delay ended with (y)our own judgement (stare decisis and res judicata in this affair). I have done it several times here in Germany, snuffing out claims by the system (the previous protection of my name as a brand was key to it), and I have also seen civil servants (judges or heads of tax offices) being entered into UCC with claims of no less than 200 million USD in ounces of gold
”

Can you elaborate on what you are referring to here?

thanks
-Dude

[Administrator]

My below post has been censored by X.com after just a few minutes for ‘hate speech’ https://ibb.co/2730NXwz
It is not possible to like, quote, comment, or reply to it. This subject seems to pierce into the system’s heart. Help me spread these thoughts.

https://x.com/whitedatenet/status/1961391007099994142

WhiteDate.Net
@whitedatenet
·
Like children, women have been taking free candy where given by the state, and of course they got used to it and are not willing to give it up without any outside pressure. When 50 years of systematic rape of White women will end the White race, which is (((their))) plan, WHAT IS the solution to motivate White men to invest their time and energy and risk their lives to protect White women? Think supply and demand. Think natural order. White men will soon start to offer security for reproductive rights on a private level by making contracts between the living man with a soul and the living woman with a soul signed with their first names in blue ink and the print of their thumbs in red. The Western states, legal systems, media, politics, and education deluded White women into believing that they could maintain a societal security and prosperity without White men and without giving White men anything of value to them in return for offering it. Perhaps many women were/are not aware of what men actually want and consider valuable because nobody explained it to our young women, whereas other races’ societies spill the news to their 5-year-old girls: the ONE THING that has had and always will have eternal value to men in a woman—and this value is as old as the history of humanity—is her youth and thus reproductive capacity FOR HIS OFFSPRING because men want to procreate, and even more, many want to create a legacy, which they have been deprived of through systematic disenfranchisement and parasitic usurpation of their resources over decades. Here is the key to the solution: all the power the state has taken from White men and all the privileges given to White women are based on laws that apply to fictions, which are names on pieces of paper called ‘persons.’ But natural law is the highest jurisdiction; it is above state law and what is generally applied nowadays, commercial law. Natural law applies to the male and female living beings with a soul. Weddings should rebecome private, not registered in (((their))) state or religious system. We should try to avoid or completely stop registering our names at all. Every signature we give, starting with the birth certificate of a newborn, is a voluntary contract with (((them))) creating, by name on paper, a ‘person’ and a bond to be traded on the stock exchange (I know, difficult to believe when you first hear it). A person backed by a human who identifies (foolishly, but sadly most of us do it all the time without even thinking about it by showing and identifying with their ID) with this fiction can give a declaration in lieu of an oath; a living human, however, can MAKE AN OATH. Guess what has more value? Of course the oath that was made by the living being. Make private wedding contracts and get married in front of a tree; negotiate and formulate your expectations from the other thoroughly. And if a civil servant wants to interfere, ask them what their jurisdiction over the living man or woman is. Spoiler: They have none. If they doubt that you are a living human, make an oath and sign it with your first name in blue ink and with your thumbprint in red. They can’t top this, because working for the state, they can only act as a person on the commercial law level. As a side note, it is possible to drag civil servants and politicians into private law to make them privately liable for their actions based on (y)our previously provided terms and conditions. This requires a formal and finished administrative process containing three or four letters with a final declaration of delay ended with (y)our own judgement (stare decisis and res judicata in this affair). I have done it several times here in Germany, snuffing out claims by the system (the previous protection of my name as a brand was key to it), and I have also seen civil servants (judges or heads of tax offices) being entered into UCC with claims of no less than 200 million USD in ounces of gold, the claim transferred to secured parties such as the Russian Federation or China, who have the debt-collecting powers if they feel like using them. On this level, it’s only business. And with these ‘commerce’ actions spreading, it is increasingly difficult for the system to find successors for the rolling heads. This post is supposed to give an impulse about what is going on on a global level; it is not a guideline to start writing informal and incorrect letters that include dishonoring statements, which the system thrives on, btw, as it gives them a hold to pursue the ‘person.’ BUT, things are happening, and, as a quintessence, the solution towards our autonomy lies in the decentralization and the privatization of our actions.

[Administrator]

My response to this below post was censored within minutes by X

https://x.com/JFGariepy/status/1960702738146451465

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

@JFGariepy
This is the kind of dumb female position that makes one realize why most societies had to restrict female public speech in some form. What PhilosophiCat is engaged in here is contest-building behavior for males. Female instinct, they can’t help it: they want to see two male deers colliding with each other just for the fun of finding out who’s the strongest (no empathy for the other one).

First, while I empathize with the young girl’s position here, I can assure you that she is born from a long line of stupid women who have caused her current predicament. I can assure you that multiple times in the history that led to her sperm and egg encounter, there were men saying “maybe it would be nice to get out of the city.”

But their female partners were saying: “I can’t get out of the city, we need a place that’s close to my family, and an elementary school, and the nail polishing salon, and my gay dog groomer.” Of course, some men do succeed at convincing some women of getting away from the city; so what’s left in the city are the beta males and idiotic women that the city deserves.

As a result of the thrill-seeking behavior of city females, who cannot make rational real estate decisions, Wendy’s the axe-warrior here was confined to an environment where she would inevitably be surrounded by brown rapists. She was deprived of the valid tactical retreat decision-making of her male ancestors trying to protect her to the benefit of the stupid socially-dependent decision-making of her female ancestors. See, we are in a war, it’s time for the frontline to retreat, but there’s a bunch of women who are so excited they don’t want to retreat; they want to stay at the front and see the male deers collide. They want blood.

But males know that blood is spilled rather randomly. Males know that war is its own form of gambling, most of the time not worth pursuing, especially not when infinite hordes of assailants are thrown at you by your own government (also female-controlled).

It is a stunning illustration of female entitlement to believe that after such an intergenerational streak of bad decision-making as the one that led to this young girl’s situation, the young girl is entitled to having males somehow materialize magically around her to protect her. This reveals an aspect of the western female mind: they believe security is a given.

Security is not a given. The default state of the world is brown rapists literally in every direction you look, 360 Google Camera style, each of them trying to grasp to steal anything of value you may have, and if you have nothing left, at least trying to get a boob squeeze or two. To escape this dire situation, you need to pay for protection, and the way you pay is by negotiating for the reproductive rights of your pussy, FOREVER.

The reason no one is coming to save this girl is the objective mathematical fact that she is not worth saving. The reason she is not worth saving is that there is no valid reward that can be promised to a White savior male who would come to her rescue. Even if she was to fall in love with him, feel the butterflies for a few weeks, what does love mean anymore? It doesn’t mean forever, and it doesn’t mean reproductive rights, and it doesn’t mean she will, unlike her ancestors, be able to acknowledge her own inability to make decisions and abandon herself to the leadership of the man. So what am I working for, if no contract can be established validly for the women I’m supposed to save? Women will have to fix marriage if they want their male deer to fight one more fight for them.

Women, by entrusting the state’s police for their security rather than their private surroundings, have made the devil’s bargain. They have decided to trust bureaucrats for their protection, and they get what they deserve: bureaucrats that will do the bare minimum, or even worse, turn against them when it is politically convenient.

This is not to mention the fact that women have, for decades, had the state confiscate any tool that the White man may have had at his disposal to handle the situation. PhilosophiCat wants men to walk around wielding axes to protect girls? How inefficient. They will all end up in jail before they get to throw one good slash, and they’ll stay in jail for much longer than this girl, thanks to the biased enforcement of the state against males (and now White males), a gift from decades of female political decision-making, female judges and anti-male biased juries.

As I said many times before, it will take a thousand years of systematic rape before the most stubborn women change or learn. Let’s get this shit started.

*

Below a screenshot of PhilosophyCat’s post that triggered JFG’s response:
https://imgur.com/a/pCeXqKD

• This topic was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by Administrator.

[Author]

Posts