[Anonymous]

I would pay if there were more than two ladies to talk to lol

[silvermane]

Well I did ask a female to check out Stormfront.org, because it’s probably the most well known of the pro-White race sites and it’s good place to meet like-minded individuals. I fact I’m thinking of upgrading my membership here so I can have the ability to PM other members.

[Zoey]

sure.
i believe most people here are in the telegram chat and that has open comments. So people can DM from there.

[Anonymous]

@Zoey

Would it be a bad idea to display social media so people can reach out?

Depends on if you want to risk getting doxxed or not. The Admin does her best to keep out infiltrators, but it’s always possible. If you want to share socmed via private DM, however, that’s different and depends on how much you trust the other party. For general, offsite points of contact open to anyone, I’d suggest using sock accounts.

[Anonymous]

I think it’s kind of good that you have to pay, because it’s a filter.

[Anonymous]

Men should pay, and women should get a certain number of free communications (i.e., they can contact and converse freely with, say, 20 people before they have to pay) since every dating site needs to attract female users. This is why clubs let ladies in for free, and why they have ladies’ night with discounted drinks, etc. In retail, they call that a “loss leader”, wherein customers are drawn in to buy an advertised product that is sold at a loss because they will then buy other stuff at a markup. Example: a 4K TV, but they need to buy HDMI cables (at a 300% markup) to hook it up to this Blu-ray player which is on sale!

[Oscar]

Why is it non-paying members can’t privately message in the first place? This is a dating site, privately messaging is kind of critical to its function.

what is it that the cashier ask me for money at the supermarket ? I mean, it’s a place with food stocked and I’m hungry so I should could eat if I want/need it, since food is a basic human need, right ?

The sense of entitlement of some still astonishes me, especially in a place where some embryo of political consciousness is supposed to have sprouted.

I’m sure 100% of you spend money on things that don’t really matter and that fatten up the big corporations of the (((System))). and then, curiously, you don’t ask yourself whether you ‘want’ to give your money to global corporations that will use it to serve you beautiful advertisements of rainbow families and coalburners in bloom.
But if you come across a small site that matches the vision you say is central to your life, a site that is struggling against all odds, especially the conspiracy of silence to stifle it, then, instead of helping out, you’re going to haggle more easily than an Arab in a carpet shop.

Our problem is clearly not only demographic. It is also – and probably primarily – that many whites now are acting like blacks.

Behave, gentlemen.

[Anonymous]

The membership fee is not expensive compared to most dating websites I’ve used. However, I would suggest that female ID-verified members should NOT have to pay for membership privileges, like private messaging, since many of these specialized dating websites quickly turn into sausage parties. I’m actually surprised by how many ladies have memberships here. Men are expected to pay for the date (if I ask a date to go “Dutch”, it’s because I don’t like her), since men are supposed to be the providers; man’s love is sacrificial, and woman’s love is acquisitional, so if men have to not only pay, but pay more for membership because women do not pay, that’s right and proper in my mind, as long as the cam-gurlz, sex-workers, and other exploiters are kept out.

[Anonymous]

@zoaye
I imagine that is against the rules as it circumvents the payment system. I’m quite confident this site does not turn a profit, so you don’t have to worry about the operator making money off you. If you pay, you are supporting a good cause.

Hasn’t anyone used conventional dating sites? They all require to send messages. If it doesn’t charge, then it shows in the crappy userbase.

[Zoey]

Would it be a bad idea to display social media so people can reach out? I wouldnt mind paying but I dont have access to a credit card atm

[Anonymous]

Hello, new kid in town. 🙂 I just found this place a few days ago.
I wish private messaging were a little more generous and allowed everyone to regardless of membership status.
But alas, hosting fees…

[ItsNatural]

@Henry Okay. I got you. I don’t know the answer to that, but me and others have talked to the administrator before many times. What I do to reach her, is look at all members online. It shouldn’t take long to go back and see when she was last online. Her avatar is of that famous drawing of the naked guy and her name is administrator. Message her about it and she is supposed to give you an answer in less than a day.

[Henry]

I’m not complaining about having to pay for sending messages. I was just asking how it works. Say someone paid, but in case they aren’t able to renew their subscription, can they still send replies to a specific user who they started a chat with earlier? That’s what I was asking. I believe in this site’s credibility and I want to make it incredibly clear that I appreciate it.

• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Henry.

[ItsNatural]

@Dave and Henry I’m not 100% sure how it’s been lately for non-paying members. I have heard stuff that they are now able to send as many messages as they like to others, whereas before it was only 0 or 1 per day, maybe? And maybe it’s because of what’s happening now in the world against us whites and the owner is doing this from her own heart and also has had enough of so many complaining about paying and asking for favors. That’s only what I am assuming here. But, why wouldn’t you want to spend a pittance to support one of the only true sites out there that is for the white race and the right to have your altruistic feelings for your race? In my view, I like it a lot and it seems to definitely be legitimate and not a ‘honeypot’ or trap, pretending to be for racial homogeneity when they are not. So, even if you don’t get a woman on here, it’s for a great cause. These forums are awesome, too, and you only get out of things what you put into them.

[Henry]

If our paid subscription ends, does that mean we can still however send message replies to accounts we’ve received messages from and sent to?

[Dave]

Why is it non-paying members can’t privately message in the first place? This is a dating site, privately messaging is kind of critical to its function.

[English Folk]

Non-paying members can reply to paid up members. I know this works. I am also sure the “Like” function works as I have sent and received likes from non-paying members. You are even able to “like” yourself to test it works.

[GreatDane]

Non-paying members can see and reply to messages from paying members. They can write here on the site. I guess it is also okay to exchange other channels, just in case “something happened” (though this is not a social media-site, where dissidents get “nuked” once in a while).

But “someone” has to invest some money in a paid membership to make it work. I am personally happy supporting this site. And there’s potential – not least for networking – with a bit of commitment.

As I understand it, posting contact info as a non-paying member is against the rules. – Maybe if the “Like”-function worked – I don’t think it does – non-paying members could show some interest in a paying member, and this member could then contact if interested.

[Henry]

Thank you

[Freddy]

I generally send my telegram just in case they can’t reply.

[Chris88]

Surprisingly no I sent a private message to someone who wasn’t a paid member and they were able to respond back.

[Henry]

If we send a private message to someone who isn’t able to send private messages because their account isn’t upgraded, does that mean they can’t see or reply to them?

[Author]

Posts