[Anonymous]

Yeah, poor Gypsy. Good luck to him

[DegenExecutor]

Well the joker I know is far from left, unfortunately he got raided by the feds on some bullshit charges of firearm possession of which I’m pretty sure was planted by the Jewish mercenaries.
(His name is Gypsy Crusader)

[JLazlo]

I agree that you’re most likely right. If you’ll excuse me going on a tangent, I like to study history which is not as obvious of an endeavor as it would seem. For example, I used to think it would be neat to watch black & white movies to understand what people were like back in those times. Now, I understand that the making of black & white movies (in the US at least) were all controlled by a certain non-European desert people. So, while those movies will give some idea of those times, it’s only within the framework of the agenda of those desert people.

[Oscar]

I put ‘Paris’ in my profile but fortunately, I don’t live in the frizzy Babylone.
But make no mistake: most of the things designated under the label ‘Paris’ actually concern suburbs which are outside Paris (even if that doesn’t change the problem).

Actually, I was referring to the US social attitude, you know the ‘American smile’ and the ‘may I help you’ spirit which has largely pre-existed the problems you have had with colored since the post-civil rights moment.

[JLazlo]

@Oscar My initial guess would be that Americans are more sensitive because of interactions with the non-whites and with lefties. But, from the nightmare stories I hear of Paris, it sounds even worse in Paris. If Parisians are not getting more sensitive then I guess it just boils down to a difference of culture.

[JLazlo]

@Oscar Cool. Thank you.

[Oscar]

teasing is not being rude, but it is true that the Americans are a little softer in this domain.

Seems there are some cultural differences across the Pond. There was no offense intended.

[JLazlo]

@Oscar There’s no reason to be rude. We are, presumably, on the same team here.

[Oscar]

@Lazlo, you probably don’t sleep enough or lack vitamine B : it’s called an oxymoron.

To stick to the subject, I am always amazed and dismayed to see that many of those who consider themselves to be dissidents have not understood the different functions of the System’s propaganda: it is not simply intended to convince, which is the case for part of the population but also, and even above all I would say, to channel the debate within the limits of the lawful and the saying that the System wants to establish as an intellectual paradigm

the culture of clash aims to constrain the debate within limits that are thought by those who impose them and to saturate the media space: to comment on mainstream production, including to criticize it, is to be accomplice ot it.

[JLazlo]

@Groyplon AF Sorry, I don’t get it.

[Groyplon AF]

>Attractive
>Quadroon

Pick one.

[Anonymous]

Joker is def leftist. He is a nigger lover throughout even fantasizing about miscegenation with the black neighbor woman. Throughout the movie blacks are put in positions of responsibility and power that they would never competently hold in real life. It’s basically an antifa origin story.

All movies are garbage now. Occasionally if you’re lucky you can find one that is far enough removed that it is not trying to make any social statement, but that is rare. Finding a pro-white society modern movie is impossible.

[JLazlo]

I have not seen the movie yet, but I have alt-right friends that really liked it. It sounds to me like the hype is a consequence of how far the Overton Window has shifted. Nowadays, if you can watch a movie where the lead actress is not declaring that her movie is for everyone except white men that is considered a win. Sad.

[hansdons]

Devon Stack has a good review touching on some of the points mentioned in this thread: https://www.bitchute.com/video/PJIZSYcgi90/

[Oscar]

Unpopular opinion: Joker is leftist propaganda

I don’t see how it could be some heretic position, ANY movie produced in the west hemisphere since, at least, the 80’s IS a piece of leftist propaganda.

There can be some innuendos in it, but even the most stupid holyjewian blockbuster produced for the Murican plebs contains leftist propaganda. mel gibson has his good nigger partner, a quiet father of two daughters – while fatherhood is pretty much a theoretical concept among black Americans.

and they obviously go off to fight together the horrible South African apartheid secret services who, despite being racist ubermensch, will nonetheless be defeated by the alliance of the brave but unbalanced white who seeks his emotional stability within a black family (lol ) as well as by a gnome

(90s… then they have not yet dared to impose a faggot in the trio)

Life is too short to waste it in analyzing all flagrances of shit.

Shit is not Numéro 5, that’s a scientifically proved fact.

There is enough in our European heritage to focus on : read Balzac, Tolstoï, Buzzati, Céline You wouldn’t have enough of two full lifes to discover all what’s need to be cherished in our real civilization

[ItsNatural]

Boy, was it hyped, for sure.

An idea just came to me. You would be a great candidate to get with some others and critique movies for the white nationalist movement and point out the crap against white people, straight people, racial homogeneity. I know this is very dangerous. This would be accompanied, of course, by other writers, speakers, and leaders in the movement, along with security, understandably. This is if you/we think that being ‘above ground’ and peaceful is still a valid option. I’m leaning towards it is not. What do you think?

Also, going on the Dark web to critique.

[After the Rain]

It’s not even an attractive quadroon like Rihanna with straight hair and green eyes. The actress’ father is a white German and her mother is African American, so she’s a bit lighter than average Shaniquas, but other than that she’s very African looking.

What can I say, it was the most hyped movie at the time and many of my friends wanted to see it. It was presented as the “incel alt-right” movie of the decade by both the left and right, if I had known what I know now, I wouldn’t have spent money on it.
Stream it without paying if you’re interested. It’s not a bad movie artistically speaking, the acting is top notch, the visuals are stylish and there is never a dull moment. It also creates a plausible origin story for one of the world’s most iconic villains.

In this case the problem lies in the substance, not in the form.

[ItsNatural]

I didn’t and wouldn’t see it, and from what you described, that is why. Yes, of course I agree it’s full blown Leftist. Wow, my friend just told me of the black woman part. Now all that other crap on top of that, too?! Girl, you got some guts to keep watching Jewish media! As of last year, I’m done seeing movies in the theatre. Just once in a while, I’ll watch what I already own. MAYBE rent some other stuff, that won’t be too bad and to keep tabs on the beyond obvious propaganda in them.

[After the Rain]

Recently I’ve watched Joker for the second time and I’ve noticed some things that have previously escaped my attention. I have read plenty of reviews before seeing the movie and I was expecting the ultimate alt-right manifesto of inceldom and white male disenfranchisement. I have plenty of reasons to believe this film is quite the opposite.

– Joaquin Phoenix is Jewish. The director, Todd Phillips is also Jewish.

– Arthur sees a black child on the train and goes out of his way to make him smile.

– The only person he opens up to and trusts to a degree is a black female social worker.

– He uses drugs to stabilise his mood and wants to up the dose.

– Arthur’s love interest is a black single mother with a fro.

– His first real enemies are three upper middle class working cis straight white men. These guys are the text book example of toxic masculinity.

– All the negative characters throughout the movie are cis straight white men. His coworkers, the three men of above, the policemen, Thomas Wayne, Murray Franklin.

– Per Joker’s own admission the only person who ever treated him with kindness is Gary, the dwarf.

– There are black people everywhere doing normal jobs and nobody bats an eye. Keep in mind the movies is set in the 70ies.

– Joker starts a movement that is reminiscent of antifa: impoverished people masking their face protesting against the bourgeoisie, sometimes using violence, racially heterogeneous.

Is there any single thing that could have possibly alluded to adherence to alt-right ideas? As far as I’m concerned this movie is full blown leftist propaganda, not an alt-right cult film.
Agree or Disagree?

[Author]

Posts