There is a strong tendency in the WN movement to forfeit existing society in favor of an alternative & parallel one, which exists off grid. Is this the right approach to rebuilding white society? It’s important if not critical to realize that emphatic yes/no and right/wrong approaches damage growth. Open dialogue, discussion and consideration allows for progress and advancement that we have to consider.
In some ways the parallel society has become the “emphatic” right thing to do and those who hang onto the political process of the existing system are delusional. It’s definitely delusional to imagine that politicians are going to reverse the crisis of western society – indeed. However, there are consequences to full abandoning the existing institutions and current political process.
Donald Trump was far from perfect candidate for US President. However, the fraudulent manipulation of the 2020 US election allowed for a completely open border which allowed for “MILLIONS” of invaders into the United States which will have to be dealt with at some point. The left is deliberately attempting to crush the spirits of anyone who has hope to save and preserve traditional western society. In that respect forfeiting from the political process awards then the objective they seek in eliminating opposition.
Was Donald Trump going to openly promote and advocate for white society? No. However – what is closer to advocacy to white society? The 1619 Project or the 1776 Project? The WN will not get National Justice Party talking points from the Republican platform but equally the NJP is currently not a viable party to win a national election.
A balance to this is “layering”. One can participate in the flawed political process as an opposition vote to prevent the worst from coming to power while creating one’s own local political power base ( alternative society) much more closely aligned to ones values. This was done at the local level at the turn of the century in the US with European immigrants. Did it matter to the Italian community of Newark NJ that Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower were President in 1948-1952? To some extent yes but what mattered more was the Italian mayor they had elected to oversee their city and preserve their interests. Life was prosperous under a society whose citizens gained political power and influence. It lead to better jobs, better education and upward progression. The next generations were able to attain increased wealth as a result. The Italian Americans who benefited did so under local influence gaining positions in labor Unions, civil service and prominent government positions. If your successor generations are purchasing property and benefiting from inheritance – you’re on the right tract. However there was unfortunate mismanagement in this success.
Learning from history, the Italians forfeited control over the city of Newark they controlled as a result of pressure from the Federal government. They got discourage, sold off their real estate and fled to the suburbs. Now the sons and daughters of those immigrants are fleeing to the country and rural areas of the state. Soon there will be nowhere left to flee. They made a huge mistake in selling off their real estate inside the city proper. North Newark became the “Istanbul” of the NJ left taken from the control of the Italians. The loss of local control had and continues to have a direct effect on the sons and daughters of western immigrants. Where are all the illegal immigrants being housed today? In cities once controlled by whites. Absent the ability to be housed the illegal immigrant waves would have had no choice but to return home or live under a bridge.
The Italians and whites in general forfeited the local layer of political control in favor of the state and federal layers which they were able to prosper under in the suburbs. The concept of layering is to be active on all levels of your society inputting greater emphasis where there is more impact to be had but maintaining a presence in others to avoid abject forfeiture. Forfeiture encourages further invasion and encroachment. The fall of Constantinople emboldened the Nation of Islam to pursue the conquest of all Christian lands. In many ways, Rome seen Constantinople as a lost cause versus a bastion of defiance. Once forfeited, they keep coming.
Today a large section of Newark is dominated by the Portuguese who have adopted a different approach than the Italians. They own half the city and have gained tremendous wealth and political influence. Although they are not the race conscious European ethnic minority they should be they are far from being dilutors of their own heritage.They are leaving millions of dollars worth of cash, investment and real estate to the next generation which is a critical aspect of survival. You can still do a lot of damage to the opposition in litigation and or the opposition of aggressive litigation by your enemy if you learn to play the “normie” game properly.
The day of revolution may come soon but equally it may never come. It is crucial and critical to be active in all layers of influence and control.
.
