[deckenfarbe]

Any idea about how to identify such “health” practitioners before you go and try their “services”, instead of running into the problem first? I mean, some of them are most likely very pale.

[Anonymous]

This is the world we’re living in…

[Sven]

@Malg

Wow… Just wow… Calls for a death sentence if you ask me

[Anonymous]

Yes, being stared at or hated is one thing, but being intentionally hurt by a healthcare “professional” is another.

I saw a screenshot of a now-deleted Tweet of some anti-White employee of an OB-GYN clinic and (s)he wrote that when White couples come for an ultrasound of their unborn baby (s)he would intentionally lie to them about serious genetic disorder to make them abort the baby (and (s)he emphasized the Whiteness of the chosen victims).

[Anonymous]

McDonald had written a response to some of the comments posed by readers of the article but I can’t find it.

The original article was reposted on another site with plenty of additional comments made there by new readers;

https://www.unz.com/article/ideas-on-maintaining-relationships-with-the-less-committed-in-a-dark-age/?showcomments#comments

[Anonymous]

Hello ATR, thank you for your input. Your concern for the status of the West and participation here on the forums is noteworthy. I haven’t read all the comments made of that article yet one rings out:

Charles Freysays:

“… every soldier throughout the world and time will tell you that ceding territory is no way to win a war.

If in doubt, check out that famous, increasingly shrinking, sequential map of Palestine, the West-Bank and the Golan: already on the drafting board of the Zionist cartographers in Basel in 1897; so to speak. From majority acreage to disparate fly specks.”

Whites are in a War and have been for a long time even if most are un-aware. In War there is fighting and suffering. There are risks to be taken and sacrifices to be made. The game of chess has pawns for a reason. Women need to be supportive of their other half if they are fighting for their eventual long term benefit, irrespective if discomfort ensues. Men assert and Women acquiesce. Acquiescence loses Wars.

The enemy, the same that Mrs. Lindbergh feared, is still at the throat of Western life; they never quit, and will never quit until all Western Countries are enslaved. Enslavement is used properly and un-sensationally, provable as stated in their own objectives.

Lindbergh could choose with whom she associated or what others may think and so can we all. All we have complete dominion over is our own thoughts. It is important to seek out those of like minds which is why we are here on this site.

[After the Rain]

At first I thought this was an article for women on how to maintain a relationship with men. Reading more carefully I realise it’s the opposite. The article is in fact aimed at men and how they can maintain a relationship with women.

If found one of the comments very interesting:

Aodh Mor MacRaynall
To expect our wives and children to suffer ostracism and loneliness is not realistic. To do so is to ignore human nature.

This man has correctly factored children into the equation. Childhood and adolescence are such fundamental moments of our lives that to expose a fragile, still forming, young mind to hatred and scorn cannot possibly result into a healthy strong adult person.
And that is only taking into consideration the psychological aspect. The possibility of haters doing tangible physical/economical damage are not to be ignored. There are examples of nurses damaging their patients because of their political views, and people getting fired for not having the “correct opinion” and this severely impacted their livelihood.

Being looked at badly is one thing. Having your healthcare practitioner purposely butchering your health is another.
Would anyone subject their pregnant wife or newborn baby to the risk of a doctor “accidentally” doing something wrong?

[Anonymous]

This is a good article from Kevin MacDonald addressing how Women can manage the inevitable social anxieties which arise when in a relationship with a pro-European Man, and on taking the logically correct, yet unpopular, path in general.

Ideas on maintaining relationships with the less committed in a dark age

“…being ostracized from polite society doesn’t bother the activists personally. They may suffer psychologically, but they firmly believe they are right, and they often have like-minded friends, if only in cyberspace. The problem comes from trying to find simpatico mates and friends beyond activist conferences and online communities.

… A famous example is Anne Morrow Lindbergh when her husband, Charles Lindbergh, stated that Jews were one of the forces attempting to get the United States to enter World War II. Shortly after his speech, she wrote:

The storm is beginning to blow up hard. …I sense that this is the beginning of a fight and consequent loneliness and isolation that we have not known before. … For I am really much more attached to the worldly things than he is, mind more giving up friends, popularity, etc., mind much more criticism and coldness and loneliness. … Will I be able to shop in New York at all now? I am always stared at—but now to be stared at with hate, to walk through aisles of hate!

I cannot explain my revulsion of feeling by logic. Is it my lack of courage to face the problem? Is it my lack of vision and seeing the thing through? Or is my intuition founded on something profound and valid? I do not know and am only very disturbed, which is upsetting for him. I have the greatest faith in him as a person—in his integrity, his courage, and his essential goodness, fairness, and kindness—his nobility really…How then explain my profound feeling of grief about what he is doing? If what he said is the truth (and I am inclined to think it is), why was it wrong to state it? “

[Author]

Posts