[Hunter]

I highly recommend https://suttacentral.net/ for all religious people. I don’t recommend you become a Buddhist, and certainly not a monk or nun if you are under 60, but I do recommend you test what you believe in light of Buddhist scripture.

[Hunter]

Thanks @AeonKnight and @Leo, I’m really sorry about your likely physically attractive yet psychologically unattractive sister, honestly it would be better if she were your sister-wife than to be bred by a non-White (by the way, Whites are the real ‘People of Color,’ given our variable colouring we have in eye, hair, and skin tone… non-Whites almost always have brown/black eyes and varying degrees of brown/black skin pigment… perhaps they should be called ‘People of Shade’ lol). I feel similarly about my rich redheaded blue-eyed sex-crime prosecutor cousin who married an ugly likely-jew lawyer (thankfully she has sworn never to have his spawn), I had a crush on her when I was 14 (she was 17). I find it difficult not to absolutely despise attractive White gals that hook-up and/or marry so-called ‘chad’ uglies and/or non-Whites. I am far more sympathetic to White guys who settle for what they can easily get (especially if they ‘stay in Mexico’ for-example). Anyways, we can only continue on ‘reaching for the stars’ such is our fate and, with luck, our destiny.

[AeonKnight]

@Hunter

“Whites seem incapable of favouring their own, and this will be our demise.”

I know it can be hard to not be a little blackpilled nowadays, especially if your own family is fucked (and my condolences), but Whites have the strongest in-group preference of any race: political polls that state otherwise are 1. Basically asking if you’re a Nazi in public, so virtue-signalling applies and 2. They’re about the social aspects of race — every group will say they’re not racist until it’s time to marry, then everyone goes for the Whitest partner they can get (as evidenced by marriage/dating app data). The only White people that commit suicide like that are biological failures, physically or psychologically, so good riddance. Our problem is that we want to HELP POCs, but that’s much easier to fix than if we wanted to breed with them (not even POCs wanna marry their own lol). Also, these polls are done to shitlibs in cities and at a time when, yes, most of our people are dysgenic and beyond help. To me, seeing that centuries of brainwashing and trillions wasted on propaganda only amounted to the fall of the already lost (eugenic, to boot) is incredibly whitepilling, and a testament to Nature’s perfection. Like @Leo has said: it’s us that will survive. They already don’t exist. Take care, mate.

White Power.

[Leo]

@Hunter You are not alone in that struggle, my friend. My family suffers a very similar scenario, pushing the Jew-Christianity nonsense. My blonde, blue-eyed sister (whom my parents worship above their other children, me and my brothers) is dating a non-White, and my parents wanted me to reproduce with a non-White woman I was dating; yet I fortunately became racially-conscious during that relationship. It’s very sad, buddy, and I’m sure you also feel like an outcast with such extraordinary awareness, isolated from your family members. Trust that I feel similarly, as I’m sure others do, too, but we’re definitely still here by your side. I know we chat off this site sometimes, but just remember I’m still willing to meet with you in-person (since we don’t live very far from each other) and even recommend women to you if I ever find someone appropriate. Finding a racially-conscious, unvaccinated, feminine woman is obviously a challenge. Don’t give up hope, brother. We may be fragmented but quality, intelligent, and loving people still exist out there, even if we’re a dying breed – and it’s those of us with a will to survive, reproduce, and prevail, who will do so.

[Hunter]

One fundamental problem with the vast majority of Whites is that they mistake weakness for strength and surrender with victory, this is originally due to the christianity (the word itself was a slur similar to ‘Nazi’ and ‘christ’-insanity would be a more modern understanding) that was imposed (coerced and forced) on Whites starting with Emperor Constantine. The ‘normal’ Whites are programmed/conditioned with an anti-morality (how can it be moral to seek death not life?) that will ultimately lead to their own extinction. The long-term solution would be to (re)educate White children (especially in boarding schools) but there is not time. The enemy is close to their absolute ‘victory’ and our permanent demise. The only realistic hope is that out of the chaos they cause, their ‘new order’ (death, absolute enslavement, the extinction of will) will not win out, but instead ours (pro-White, pro-Eugenics, and pro-Liberty) will.

[Hunter]

The ‘family’ I was born to is lost. All my brothers (and ultimately my father) reject and/or attack me in favour of ‘jew-christianity’ and jewish ‘mainstream’ memes, and that is despite being as non-aggressive as possible, even to the point of implosion and self-harm. In fact, they have never accepted me, let alone loved me. The have sooner embraced an ugly Mexican (as a wife or sister) and her mestizo spawn. This is all my dying father’s fault yet ultimately the blame lies with the jews and/or White weakness. Whites seem incapable of favouring their own, and this will be our demise.

[AeonKnight]

@Oscar

If anyone can buy guns, that just reinforces your lack of choice regarding not having one yourself. Also, better to have a knife in a gun fight than nothing at all, I guess. It’s mostly about neighbours, like you said, but only if they have guns as well. If you can’t defend yourselves, you’re just gathering shit for the gang that can.

America cucking on January 6th (and many other occasions, the first being forced integration at gunpoint) doesn’t take away the importance of guns, “fetishism” or not.

When our people finally decide to rise up, we cannot do it with sticks.

[Djehuti]

That election WAS stolen, however in a perfectly normal election the result is still non legitimate, because the necessary conditions are never met: voters with common interests (not some wanting to destroy the nation, others to protect it, imagine that in a group of doctors deciding on what to do with a patient); a proper access to relevant information and the means to understand it in ALL voters; a personal economical interest in the best outcome for the country, and not for your faction; and a way to monitor and sanction the government every day. All that was real in real democracy, that is, Athens or the Allthing, with small, ethnically homogeneus groups of people. But not possible in Modern monster nations. It could never happen. Instead we got industrial farms where we are managed, milked, and sacrificed.

[Oscar]

” buy weapons” i perfectly understand the theorical interest of having weapons (defending home from intruders etc) but simple question : do you REALLY believe that it’ll allow you to do something special in case of WW3 ?

if the shit hit the fan the best kind of security you’ll have is to have secured strong relations with trustable neighbours, because if YOU can buy guns, very numerous others can too.

the american fetishism about guns has proven the 6th of january how much bullshit it was the trumpists believe the election was stolen ( I don’t but that’s not the problem) and what happened then with the “400 mlillions of guns” ? nothing (or rather one woman killed by a badge nigger, a piece of lard died by heart attack and some average joe who’ll are experimenting what naivety in politics is paid cash while rotting for years in jail

[FrankD]

Came to this website to find love but now I’m here to discuss philosophy with the homies. I’m not a particularly smart man but one philosophy to follow is to keep things practical. We are on the brink of world war 3 thanks to the bankers and as a result it would be wise if we all secure all of our immediate material needs. And if you’re in America like me buy weapons lol

[Djehuti]

The Theatre of the world is optional

We don´t (always) need to see reality through the lens of the Theatre of the World. When Shakespeare wrote the verses of “all the world is a stage”, he was noticing how our personal and collective identities were apparent and transient and useful as roles that moved the plot farther, but vanishing like all things not fundamental vanish. The once-called “Spanish Shakespeare”, Calderón de la Barca, wrote also a play titled “La vida es sueño”, exploring a similar theme but using dreaming as the metaphor.

However, a thing that is ephemeral and illusory is not unreal; the historical play and the roles human life is giving in them are in some way authentic, because they are genuinely lived and they have deep consequences that go way beyond the scope of the play.
The “Theatre of the World” is a part of our natural interface as a species, built upon primate traits and social roles, but developed to be made fit for the civilized stage we have run into in the last millennia: the “world as a book” mindset.

Like anything else in the interface, this “narrative map” is not literally real; but it makes possible for humans to survive and to act upon the world we live in at different levels. The Theatre of the world is the part that represents social life as a story, with beginning and end, and a plot that unfolds and is periodically resolved in a climax. The play includes good and evil, and characters with “free will” that incarnate good and evil for us. The Civilizatory part contributes literary traits, like linear time, an end of the world, and omniscient, all-powerful supernatural writers outside the world scene.

The story, is purpose, the free-willed personae and super-personae and their good/evil predicament are all still fictional, not literally real.

Why we need the Theatre of the World then? Well, we use it to enact social routines and process information in a way that can be streamlined, modeled, transmitted by society and by ourselves. And even more importantly, it focuses our behaviour and attention. The purpose of optimising and focusing is to help survival: Survival not only of organic bodies and individual psyches; but the whole social project and its involvement in the broader schemes that span millennia.

The ultimate purpose of this drama plays is the need to create axis centres that bring together the energy required for manifestation, for creating anything. That´s the whole mystery for the sometimes weird story-building: to keep alive those flames that cook something of value in the social sphere; be a person, a city, a school of thought, whatever.

If we know that this asymmetry of value or “anchoring of social effort” is physically needed -just like soil needs seeds to grow plants or a river basin an original depression in the ground to build itself- we can separate ourselves from the “Theatre of the world” rationally.

For instance: we don´t need to consider that a certain people are “chosen” or “something else”, and that other people standing in the way of their prosperity are “bad”. We don´t need to draw legitimacy to work for our own preservation and development, from any narrative other than the raw fact, which is, that´s how evolution takes place. Entities try to survive for their own very benefit, and necessarily at the expense of others.

This fundamental “selfishness” is neither good nor bad; it´s just necessary if you want life to emerge and develop. What is necessary can not be qualified; for example, it makes sense to say that drinking wine is desirable or undesirable, but not that drinking water is “good”.

These formative constraints that we are all resisting as they shape us, only work and produce their miracles if we indeed offer a centre that tries to survive and live on. You mind your own business and Nature will impose is sieve upon everybody to preserve, not what is fittest or best, but what it is possible.

Thus, for any given ethnicity or society, anybody else is either friend or enemy, depending on how their own thing is helping us to cross “the possible” line or they will be an obstacle. So it is not about being “good” or “bad” in absolute terms, we are all destined to be good or bad for everybody else and it is not a moral quality but instrumental.

It is also not a choice: you don´t choose to be someone´s friend or foe, but to survive or not; and if you want to survive and thrive, the discrimination of who are your good guys and bad guys will follow from the causal landscape that will make your path and their paths come together or collide.

There are some others re-arrangements of our categories of the world that are made possible by thinking outside the “Theatre of the World”. These new possibilities for our thinking and acting are crucial in our dark, challenging times, because they provide the room and dispersion that our minds need to explore and seek new possible solutions to the most gargantuan threats that Earth and Man have ever experienced.

I know that thinking outside this box, even in “hypothetical terms” is hard. However it is not super-human. I know this because most of my life I have been very deep into the “theatre of the world”, very much so, a real activist and utopian always musing on the play. However I eventually found out that you can think outside the Theatre of the World parameters safely, without compromising what really matters to you in the slightest.

[AeonKnight]

@Hunter

I generally agree, except I’d argue that out of all human species, Whites have the highest chance for long-term success — such is the case ever since our inception: if anyone can make it, it’s us lol.

If all of this selective pressure, Constantine included, had never happened, then we’d truly be in a position to be severely lacking for the future. The anti-fragility the Jew creates is wholly fundamental and, in my opinion, vital. Let life fight death and win.

White Power.

[Hunter]

The vast majority of people, including White people, have no interest in Truth. They prefer sweet lies, and often fall for lies that are really not so sweet. The continued popularity of ‘the rulers have the best intentions and work for the collective good’ and ‘equality’ and ‘christ’-insanity are cases in point. If what ultimately motivates people is collective fantasy, why not design a fantasy that motivates people to make the real world a better place. The trouble is you can only really do this by conditioning children AKA the primary method any memetic conditioning persists in the social world. Adults, for the most part, will rigidly adhere to their childhood conditioning. This is especially true of women. They will normally never consider a man outside of their conditioning. This makes it very, very, difficult to start a new and better society. This explains why the trajectory (of even 1%) of White subspecies cannot so easily be changed for the better. The decision of Constantine may have signalled the ultimate end of our race thousands of years ago. That said we must, regardless, attempt to create our eugenic societies pursuing utopia. Long-term success, however, would be close to a true miracle at this point.

[Leo]

@AeonKnight That’s part of why I don’t bother so much identifying with specific ideologies or label myself any type of way, within reason; because the vast majority of my worldviews haven’t been constant across my lifetime (my atheism has been the most constant, lasting ~20+ years thus far). On so many occasions, however, I was convinced of something for so long (usually for many years), only to later realize how wrong I was all along (especially when new, fascinating ideas were introduced to me, by you and/or countless others), thereafter researching, contemplating, and oftentimes developing a new outlook. Suffice it to say, that we’re ever-changing – hopefully – for the betterment of our understandings, ourselves, and those around us, ha.

[AeonKnight]

@Hunter

Perfect happiness, as in absolute lack of discontent, is unattainable, especially for finite beings, because it’d be in conflict with drive for any process. I wouldn’t argue that purpose cannot be the process, but more finely that the culmination of true purpose is understanding/acceptance of the process (that the process IS), i.e., fulfillment of your role in Creation. That would be, in my opinion, the closest humans can get to ultimate happiness: action/being through clarity. True free will.

@Leo

It makes perfect sense to be an atheist in the modern Abrahamic paradigm, but keep in mind that actual atheism is denying the metaphysical, not denying x or y God(s), especially anti-Nature theology like Judaism/Christianity. There is a quote I like from Ken Wheeler: “Religion is secularised metaphysics”. Although I don’t have any personal objection with atheism in itself, the necessity of the meta is hyper-logical (cannot be man-made, by definition): the problem is that this very logic is hijacked by midwit arguments such as “sun go up, sun go down, therefore Jesus” and the like, which is understandably unconvincing lol. The physical needs the metaphysical in the same way one side of the coin needs the other side, so to speak.

On politics: the problem with anarchy, libertarianism, individualism, secularism, etc., is that they aren’t stable long-term — just ask Nature. It doesn’t matter what nomenclature you use, or what triggers a label gives you — call it Fascism, National Socialism, whatever: that which isn’t violently pro-itself and harmonic with the environment, at the same time, will eventually cease. Only Fascist/NatSoc philosophy is in line with processes displayed by every organism alive which can’t be talked into behaving against itself, from bacteria to plants to animals, even inanimate matter. The Jew tries to divide this most obvious fact into several imperfect, therefore unstable, options — capitalism and socialism dichotomy again. Half-truths are deadlier than full falsehoods. Only one answer is correct. Another quote I like, by C.S. Lewis: “All that is not eternal is eternally out of date.”

[Leo]

@Hunter Oh, in terms of my conscious approach to life, I don’t know if I have ideologies I identify with, except perhaps these:

Regarding religion, I am an unchangeable atheist, but one who respects Christians and appreciates my Protestant upbringing – although, I’m concerned about Christianity spawning from Judaism that I despise. So, there’s some internal turmoil about that. I do think all religions are man-made fabrications, however, and have never discovered any evidence whatsoever of god(s). I’m also curious about paganism and the religious views my ancestors had prior to becoming Christianized, but that’s another story.

Regarding politics, I wouldn’t consider myself an anarchist or voluntaryist, but maybe nearing that. I don’t vote or recognize today’s United States government as legitimate, considering how overrun it is with Jews. I might have respected it a couple centuries ago, but definitely not nowadays. I can’t speak on all governments of the world, but corruption, deception, and exploitation seem rampant, and I tend to find them more damaging than helpful as they’re meant to be. So, autonomy is more my style.

Regarding philosophy, I liked the idea of humanism when I first came across it a decade ago. I haven’t read much into it since, but from a brief summary I can agree with secular humanism, in the sense of being ethical and moral as determined on an individual basis, based on lived experiences and personal preferences. I honestly just live according to whatever I consider appropriate, engaging in introspection, observational learning, and self-transformation when I or others help me realize a change is necessary.

I hope that’s something along the lines of answer(s) you’re expecting with your question. Thanks for asking the community!

[Hunter]

What I have described in the third post of this thread could be described as meta-philosophy. In terms of philosophy herself, I am naturally ’Libertarian’ and ’Epicurean’ viewing the purpose of life as the pursuit of happiness, the ultimate state of happiness being characterized first by the absence of pains (while being able to feel pain), second by freedom from fears (while being able to sense and fear danger), and third by the pursuit of pleasures. The way to move closer to this ultimate state is through power. Underlying the pro-White movement is the axiom ‘might is right beauty is justice.’ Ultimately, the only objective ‘sin’ in this world is weakness, since weakness inevitably leads to non-existence. What exists is therefore relatively strong by definition. Whites collectively face extinction, this is due to our collective weakness compared to competing collectives. An individual that could out-compete an entire race would be considered as a ‘god’ to that race. AI certainly has that potential. Thus, another axiom has been proven, ‘if god or gods did not exist humans would create them.’ One could say this creation has been ongoing, with AI potentially enabling the ‘magnum opus’ of ‘theogenesis.’

[Hunter]

@Leo, a meme is the smallest ‘block’ of ‘information’ that can influence us, the word was created from the word ‘gene,’ the smallest ‘block’ of heredity. Thus, a memetic operating system is even more expansive than what we understand by the words ‘religion’ and ‘philosophy.’ Basically, in the sense I am using it, it represents your conscious approach to life.

[Hunter]

For anything I can think about as a distinct something, I have a feeling or level of like or dislike (x-axis), and a level of care (y-axis). Then, I have a master ‘volume’ my total level of care. I am by nature, very caring, and this ‘attachment’ has caused me great suffering. The Buddha was right about this, the more you care, the more you suffer if things do not go according to your desires. Beyond this, as a man, I would say that the more you care about woman, the less likely she is to care about you. However, I reject turning the ‘volume’ down to 0, at that point, you mind as well kill yourself with painkillers. I aim to lower the ‘volume’ to 1 from X. At this point my level of like/dislike/care for each distinct something remains unchanged, thus my priorities (a numerical order from 1-X) remain unchanged. However, I am then ‘cool’ not merely in the sense of being sexually attractive (especially to the opposite sex), but from within. In other-words, my cares remain the same, but I care-less, so much less. I come to this point after 20 years of great suffering, alone, and a continual struggle to escape that suffering.

[Leo]

@Hunter What do you mean? Are you asking where we source our favorite memes from, or something else?

[Hunter]

What is your memetic operating system?

[Author]

Posts