[Inndawoods]

Define your terms then @NatCollie.

• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by Inndawoods.

[Inndawoods]

Sexual selection is a form of soft eugenics. I’d be for soft eugenics at a public level with incentives for people that contribute in the public space in order to promote people with inheritable social characteristics.

[Dave]

The ideal form of society wide eugenics, is to take a complete hands off approach, and prevent anyone from trying to implement eugenics policies. Natural selection is what allowed us to exist, it does a fine job when it’s allowed to work.

It’s good to remember that not all eugenics programs are positive. Socialism is an example of a negative eugenics program. It steals from those that are intelligent, physically capable, and willing to work, and gives to those that are retarded, feeble, and unwilling to work. This naturally results in the society as a whole degenerating as each generation has more and more incapable people, and less and less capable people.

You must always be vigilant against negative eugenics programs, as it is one of the primary tools the jews have used against us.

As for an individual’s eugenics, as in your descendants, ideology is the ideal form of eugenics. Ideology and natural selection are fundamentally intertwined. Therefore, if you want your descendants to continue progressing and not fall into degeneracy and extinction, then you must give them an ideology that will allow them to resist degeneracy.

Keep in mind, all communal ideologies can and will be subverted by our enemies.

[ItsNatural]

Right NatColie. Clear and hereditary defects that aren’t good. I’m saying that the you-know-whos get really down on the National Socialist regime about everything to get the masses against them, even about things that aren’t wrong, make sense, or aren’t that bad. The microscope needs to get on THEM – put them on the hot seat. They and others have been much worse at times, and have been the biggest threat. And Germans, especially that regime, had certain harder core values that are different than others. I’m not saying that I agree with them all, just that they are different than the nicey nice, don’t harm anything values forced on the public of today (unless it is a racist, segregationist, or traditionalist. lol).

Yes, determine if mental or physical illness is heritable.

[Marcus]

In theory it is a good idea like Itsnatural said sterilising those with lesser qualities would improve our quality but the problem is who decides on the lesser qualities, is it us as a community or will it be big governments lead by people like Biden, Johnson or Merkel.

[Anonymous]

Eugenics are right only when talking about clear and obvious heritable defects, we should define that before discussing the ethics of eugenics

[ItsNatural]

I don’t exactly understand what your feelings are on this. To me, I think Eugenics is right and understandable – an act of mercy and to make the race more healthy, happy, and fit. However, I think that they shouldn’t be killed, but sterilized and allowed to live out the rest of their lives.

[Anonymous]

https://www.cchr.org/documentaries/psychiatry-an-industry-of-death/psychiatry-the-men-behind-the-holocaust.html

[Author]

Posts