[Archtraitor]

I think both parents being committed to their offspring is more important than trying to achieve the best chances.

Having one child with a more compatible partner is better than five with someone you share little in common with.After all the child will have to be raised with the correct values.For that a strong relationship between the two parents is better than a fractured one.

There are also options for adoption if things do not work as intended

Essentially be with the person that is right for you and the rest will sort itself out

[Wakstar]

Truth bomb: you are exponentially more likely to have a down syndrome or mentally handicapped child after the age of 33. Sucks, but it’s true. Also, check out the stats on women dying during childbirth, complications after childbirth, and infant mortality. There is no benefit to delaying pregnancy beyond your early thirties. Pregnancy is the hardest thing a woman can do to their body. You need to be young, healthy, and fit.

[Sigma]

Dainty lady….. let’s assume for the sake of argument that men and women have the same clock………..women are still the only ones putting off having children and are the only ones causing us to go extinct

[Anonymous]

Women in their 40s have the advantage of wisdom and emotional and financial security. You can’t depend on men these days.

If you can be a mom in your 40s, do it! Don’t listen to bullshit like “your eggs have all dropped!”. My mom had me when she was 40.

[DaintyLady]

Eve, WhiteyWhiteGuy, and After the Rain, thanks for the interesting info. Maybe we should start our own sperm bank. Lol. But seriously, I think it’s a good idea for people who are aware of the dwindling numbers of our race to know what our reproductive parameters are. For anyone just finding this conversation, I’ve come up with a more succinct way of summarizing it.

That article’s findings indicate that the chances of reproduction are best when one or both parties are in their 20s or 30s. So:

– A man in his 40s or older + a woman in her 40s or older = not a good chance of having kids

These combinations have a better chance of having kids:

– A man in his 20s or 30s + a woman in her 20s or 30s (best scenario, IMO, from a biological standpoint, but everyone is free to have their own opinion)
– A man in his 40s + a woman in her 20s or 30s
– A woman in her 40s + a man in his 20s or 30s

Another thing to keep in mind is that whatever those in control are doing to the Western world to reduce fertility (vaccines, chemtrails, EMFs, plastics, soy, etc.), they appear to be targeting the sperm, not the eggs. My parents had kids when they were both in their early 40s, but two of my siblings were not able to have kids with their partners, and in both cases when the wife was checked out by a doctor, she was found to have no problems, but when the husband was checked out by a doctor, he was found to have low or no sperm.

[After the Rain]

Sperm banks typically do not take sperm of men over the age of 30.

The place where I work has 35 as the cutoff age for sperm donation. While I don’t work in the branch of reproductive medicine it is my understanding that if a place where to acquire, cleanse, process and store sperm at their expenses they’d make sure to only store genetic material from the “top shelf” age.
If you are just storing sperm/ova for your own future personal use then of course there is no limit because you’d be the one fronting the costs. I think this will become more and more common and affordable in the near future.

Liv has an interesting video where she talks a bit about those things as well Nothing Is Lost – WhiteDate.NET

[Anonymous]

I’m 46. My sperm is potent and strong. I’ve had it tested. I’d like to give it to someone though sooner than later hahaha but I am very fertile and everyone in my family has good strong genetics, no one has died young from any disease. I think this is important to remember. Most diseases could be eradicated if only people over forty reproduced because most people of that age represent people with long life spans. Anyway I heard that from a biologist so it must be true!

No, but seriously, if you want a good white man with superb genetics and good morals let me know 🙂

[Anonymous]

Is this forum mostly men?

[Eve]

Also consider the simple fact that many married women that have trouble conceiving because their husbands have low quality sperm will go to sperm banks and successfully conceive. Sperm banks typically do not take sperm of men over the age of 30. It’s a profit driven business and the results driven business and the reason why they do this is because science has shown that is the best course of action. As a man ages sperm often defects to some degree every time they reproduce. Two tails, 2 Heads, damaged center points, immobility, in ability to swim straight e.g. they go in circles remove about chaotically. There are also higher incidences of psychosis and autism among children sired by older fathers. While a good deal of older men might be able to reproduce, his offsprings dna might need several generations of young men and women to help repair it. Generally,the best strategy is for both women and men to reproduce while they are at thier most fertile and fit stage of life. Please don’t get offended by the fact of this…Men or women.

[Eve]

I believe all of this is true dainty lady. If you do a search on women that conceive after 40 on YouTube and Instagram almost always, their male partners are younger than them. Sperm does degenerate overtime…It’s not exactly the same refreshed every day like the other poster has said I have plenty of science that I can produce to back up this claim. If anyone is interested simply ask me and I will supply the science. In a purely rational numbers-based way of thinking older men should seek out younger women and older women should seek out younger men for the healthiest offspring. Of course there are exceptions where there are older women that are much more healthier than some younger women and there are older men that are much more healthier than some young men but in terms of averages… Age is a huge factor for both sexes. Of course science does show it’s much more of a factor for women fertility potential. It’s not a very romantic thought To select a partner based on age and a numbers game but science does back the ideas. I don’t think we should be fighting with each other about this because yes, if we don’t do something creative we do face dilution or worse. We should all be working as a team and looking at the facts without our preconceived bias’s interfering. A woman no matter her age, should never give up and she should do all she can to affect a positive outcome and I hope men of this community can support that. I am all for a natural process but in the current situation we are in older potential mothers can get Tested Early in the pregnancy. I am mostly pro-life but in the case of certain birth defects, rape and incest I think there is a grey area.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by Eve. Reason: Typing on my phone... made errors and added

[DaintyLady]

From that article:

“The study, presented at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine’s annual conference in Honolulu, is the first to provide evidence that men, like women, have a biological clock.

“Dr Dahan and colleague Noof Al-Asmari studied 631 women aged 40 to 46 using IVF. Their partners ranged in age from 25 to 73. When the women were split into two groups – those who had babies and those who didn’t – the average age of the men who did not become fathers was just 43 and a half. This applied no matter how old the woman was.

“Dr Dahan said: ‘Younger women’s eggs can fix any defects of genetic material of the sperm. But once a woman hits 40, that’s no longer true. It suggests once the woman is reaching 40 and the man is in his early 40s as well, the male is having a biological clock.’ ”

I guess it’s up to people to decide if they believe the study or if they think it’s pseudo-science. I’m not trying to start a debate about reproductive equality. I think the article provides useful info. for men and women of all ages, assuming one believes the study’s results. Based on the study:

– Young couples who are around the same age should keep in mind that their chances of reproducing go down when both of them reach their early 40s.
– Women older than their early 40s are obviously not as likely to get pregnant, but their chances of reproducing are better if their partner is in his 20s or 30s. (The article gives examples of women older than their early 40s who had children with 20-something or 30-something-year-old men, which I’m sure is not a common thing.)
– Men older than 43.5 need to find a woman in her 20s or 30s if they want to improve their chances of reproducing.

I hope you and your fiance have lots of children! 🙂

[Anonymous]

Sorry but that dailymail (lol) article is pure propaganda. Its purpose is to create “equality” between men and women by advancing pseudo-science that there is a biological clock for men. This is just not true. A woman is born with all of her eggs. women are born with all the eggs they will ever have. This means a 40 year old woman has 40 year old eggs, and also that by far the majority of her healthy eggs have already dropped.

A man creates new sperm every day. Fresh, healthy sperm living for its very first day, each day of the man’s life. However, if a man lives longer there is more time in which he could sustain damage to his testicles, which would impair his ability to make sperm. The studies that claim a decrease in sperm quality are all statistical studies. They are not conclusions from scientific (ie biological) deduction.

The fact is, women should not be fed pseudo-science to make them feel good about delaying having children until their 30s or 40s. They should be encouraged to have healthy babies in their 20s.

But yes, as a man in his 40s seeking to have more children I have chosen a fiance that is still in her 20s because that is definitely the right way to go if I still want kids.

[DaintyLady]

I think to avoid becoming extinct, more white people need to have children. For those of you who might struggle to have children, the article below has useful info. (though it uses some annoying terms). It says that if the man and woman are both in their 40s, they are less likely to conceive. The reason is because younger eggs can repair defects in older sperm, younger sperm can repair defects in older eggs, but an older egg and older sperm have trouble repairing defects in each other. So if you’re a woman in your 40s, you have a better chance of getting pregnant if you choose a younger man who is not in his 40s. Likewise, if you’re a man in your 40s or older, you also have a biological clock and have a better chance of having children if you choose a younger woman who’s not in her 40s. Of course, I think the best scenario is for both parties to be young and close in age, but I’m sharing this info. for the benefit of older people who have realized, late in the game, the importance of continuing the white race.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2804191/40-want-baby-younger-man-Women-s-chances-motherhood-plummet-partner-older-43.html

I also recommend reading Dr. Weston Price’s “Nutrition and Physical Degeneration” and understanding the importance of both the man and the woman eating nutrient-dense food even before conceiving a child because the food affects the quality of the sperm and egg. Then the woman should eat nutrient-dense food while pregnant and the child should be given nutrient-dense food for proper growth and development. Nutrient-dense foods all come from animals, and the three main categories of nutrient-dense foods are raw dairy products, organs of land animals, and fish and shellfish. You can read most chapters of the book for free here:

http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200251h.html

or here:

http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library/price/pricetoc.html

[Author]

Posts