[Anonymous]

Bring back honesty. A ray of hope…
White edelweiss
https://t.me/edelweisswarriors

“𝒲𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝒾𝒻 ℐ 𝒸ℴ𝓊𝓁𝒹 ℯ𝓈𝒸𝒶𝓅ℯ 𝓉𝒽ℴ𝓈ℯ 𝒸𝓇𝓊ℯ𝓁 𝓂ℴ𝓃𝓈𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓈? 𝒜𝓃𝒹 𝓂ℴ𝓋ℯ 𝓉ℴ 𝒶 𝒻𝓇ℯℯ 𝓌ℴ𝓇𝓁𝒹 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽ℴ𝓊𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝒾𝓃.” – That’s White edelweiss.

[Anonymous]

Even child molesters work together in often large groups. The people I know about (I consider them to be Satanists too) even don’t have to fear the police. The laws by the way are unjust and a bad joke anyway.
Only the victims are left alone. And they are alone. In this strange world the psychiatry has too much power (through a majority) to gain control about people who don’t want to be numbers. They shouldn’t have any control of the victims. If they want to torture someone, they should stick to the bodies, that are pro-psychiatry. This is not a fair system!

[cheburashka]

‘Satanists’ is probably not the best term if you want to refer to most people, to avoid confusing others. Most people are drones, who wear their mask outdoors and do what their TV tells them to do. Not everybody is irredeemable however, so it’s good to keep your options open for who to work with. Actual Satanists tend to be individualists so you’re unlikely to form a community with them anyway.

[Anonymous]

Satanists are most people (except different thinkers). They follow the call of an evil spirit. I even get beaten for having a personality. I only admire a warrior and leader, not something that crawls and bows.

[Anonymous]

If you don’t like my idea, just create your own topic.

[Anonymous]

@evelinchenwasserperle

Wrong topic. I don’t want to work together with Satanists or beg for them, because they are a majority. I want to break free! Therefor an independent country is needed, where every coin goes to the right project. What or whom do you support with your (tax payers) money and the politicians you didn’t have voted for?

Who are you calling the Satanists?

It is easy to say that we should establish our own country, but it is a very idealistic, distant future goal. Sure we can talk about it and all the great things we will have but you need something realistic to act upon. The realistic goal is creating pro-White communities wherever we can and networking them so that all the money we spend stays within our community but at the same time we are siphoning income from the rest of the country. We need people to be employed in the broader economy and pulling money from that into our own economy, and then on top of that we add goods and services created by our community to create more wealth in our community.

On the social side, we have to convert existing traditional minded White people to be pro-White. That is how we grow. Growing from birthrate is NOT a viable strategy given our short available timeline. If you are calling typical right leaning White people as the enemy, then you have lost me. Those are our people. If you don’t want to save them then who are you even fighting for?

If your plan is “maybe an independent rich investor could support this realization,” then it’s not a plan at all. Just a pipe dream.

[Anonymous]

Before you let your homeland fall into the hands of the enemy, burn it down.

[Anonymous]

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

I hope the warrior spirit comes back. Words have been changed enough. Now let’s see deeds.

[Chris South and NY]

West Virginia is actually beautiful in terms of nature, and with mountains and natural resources its could be quite appealing. Certainly it is very poor, but these are ultimately our people and they’re overall good people. Obese, hadn’t heard that one myself actually, I would have suspected nonwhite obesity to be the driver for the most obese states actually from the data, but I can believe it. Anyways though, you’re right on making multiple communities. I figure that it will be a great thing to have communities that will also network. The main issue is still ensuring money/resources are in place to get them going.

[Freddy]

I have never been to West Virginia. But I’ve also heard it’s one of the poorest states in the country as well as most obese. But I could be wrong. Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont are closer to me and I know some areas up north very well. We don’t have to build one community or communities in just one area. We can build several communities throughout the country.

[Chris South and NY]

Hello Freddy,

Interesting, I hadn’t checked Maine, it does strike me as pretty mentally sick though, not to say that they won’t turn around with constant reminders of the threat of antiwhiteism. Maybe that’s worthwhile. More immediately, I had hope with Idaho and nearby states as those states are already targets for like-minded people to work collectively and move there. Long term, I agree that the far North comes natural to us, and if there is a technological collapse (I wouldn’t count on it soon though) we instantly gain massive biological advantages in living up north. Still cold, but more mountainous, less cold, have you checked out West Virginia? Very cheap housing, great demographics, and good people, many too poor to be infected with antiwhite concerns.

[Anonymous]

Not red, but patriotic – right! 👇
https://www.kla.tv/13206

[Freddy]

Any great place for building communities is Maine.. It’s the safest and whitest state in the country. It has the lowest population density rate of any state east of the Mississippi. The highest percentage of forest of any U.S. state. Land is cheap up their and it has a small enough population that with enough people from the right moving up their it can turn red. They say you should start off local regarding pro family policy’s well Maine is probably one of the best places for that in the U.S.

[PARADOXICAL003]

>You can do that, but it’s too hot down there for me.

It can get cool there too, especially at night, and in regions like peru.

> I like the lovely nature and the mountains and lakes in Austria.

Me too, a lot of the north is beautiful.

–

>The aims of non-violently getting natives, and in your estimation large swaths of them, to move out by us moving in — is quite bluntly, absurd.

Jewish organizations did a great job of it, there’s already quite a push for open borders where third-worlders move to Europe and North America, which has already been quite successful, the push for it is stronger than the push against it, so we just go with the flow, and use it to our advantage by moving out to where the migrants are coming in from, then doing as the jeworgs do and get the rest of the people there to move out as well, we don’t need all, just most, enough for us to become the new government.

Also, there’s a push for us “racists” to leave, the sign goes “deport all racists”, so we simply take them up on the offer, tell them we are going out to build our own country from scratch,, where no one else will be bothered by us, and you can take in all the people we convince to give their lands up to us by moving out.

>Personally, it is not my interest to charge what I do with a geo-political agenda. What I intend to do is something that is functional, unique, wholesome and sustainable. I do not have ambitions to change the face of the earth.

My ambition is one specific thing, the 14 words, anything else that is being accomplished in my plan is merely a means to that end, giving us a homeland is all that is important to me.

>There are more elements to what was written that I find naïve, but I’m not really here to argue about that – but you did ask for other’s thoughts, and those are mine.

Thank you for sharing them.

I’ve got other plans as well, but I just thought this one was worth mentioning.

BTW, I’m looking for people to hang out with IRL, that’s why I came to this site in the first place, kinda weird to sign up to a date site and not be able to figure out how to get a date, I’m not even necessarily looking for anything romantic, simply having someone I can spend time with and talk to who I don’t have to hide my power level around is enough for me.

[Anonymous]

Haha yeah basically. I agree about the Austrian climate.

My thoughts on the above concept (PARADOXICAL) are more or less that they are incredibly idealistic and not realistic. The aims of non-violently getting natives, and in your estimatation large swaths of them, to move out by us moving in — is quite bluntly, absurd.

Personally, it is not my interest to charge what I do with a geo-political agenda. What I intend to do is something that is functional, unique, wholesome and sustainable. I do not have ambitions to change the face of the earth.

There are more elements to what was written that I find niave, but I’m not really here to argue about that – but you did ask for other’s thoughts, and those are mine.

[Anonymous]

You can do that, but it’s too hot down there for me. I like the lovely nature and the mountains and lakes in Austria.

[PARADOXICAL003]

If we were to just establish our own town, I’d suggest we do so by mass migrating to some specific location in the third world.

Here me out.

– we can convince the locals to move back to where we came from, I exchange for them allowing us to move to their region of the world, instead of pushing back against the policies imposed on us by the enemy, we make use of those very policies to secure what we desire. What are the enemy going to say? That they are now against the idea of “right of movement” and open borders for native Africans or south Americans to migrate to whichever country they wish to? Against the idea of the racists deporting themselves?

– we can start anew, this means we will have no corrupt government to clean up, we can make whatever policies and systems that we want. Sure, we also have to build from nothing, but we are good at doing that, and anyone who cones over will have to put in their share of the labor, lots of people, like myself, welcome the struggle since it means living a meaningful life and breaking up the boredom.

– the end goal is getting an empire out of the deal, we take one place in Africa, send the Africans to America, then move onto the next place, we move quickly, each time evicting the Africans and sending them to the first world, quickly so that the first world will not lose its appeal before we finish, soon all of the land south of the Sahara is ours, and not a single act of aggression was needed to get it, the change of landowners was done 100% voluntarily. Most will want to leave, those who wish to stay, they can most likely be dealt with in such a way as to satisfy both of us.

– the global north becomes brown and black, a fate we seemingly could have avoided, while the global south becomes white, whichbis Makin the best of a bad situation, our people are secured, we can build up a great society anywhere in short order, and as the north falls into decline, perhaps the resulting hardships might have the same evolutionary effect on the north new residents that it had on our ancestors, they get smarter, more compassionate, and better at teamwork, since those who didn’t die without leaving descendants.

– a fresh start and a pioneering spirit, a great reversal of the north and south, rich and poor, white and black. We take new soil to preserve the old blood. The first thing on the dockets wjen we get our new home is to find ways to defend it from nukes and missiles, or to survive such an attack, as the old world militaries might be interested in playing dirty. The next thing we do is establish a new government, and start building.
I reccomend the combination of nationalism and capitalism, nationalism for external matters, capitalism for matters occurring within the empire, that way we have a nation that puts its people first, but also an economy and system of law that allows the freedom for rapid productivity and general happiness (happiness is more about control than fortune, people would rather live a life where they fail on their own merits, than be taken care of by the decisions of others).

Anyways, that’s my plan, white flight nationalism. What do you think?

[Chris South and NY]

If you have a piece of land in mind consider reaching out to me. I have experience in design for a lot of building types, large project planning, and the type of architecture built to be defended. No matter what you would need people local to whichever area to work on the project (for example, putting together design documents usually takes a local architect by country/state at least to sign, or on small enough projects/certain places you’ll mainly just need a capable contractor/work crew, which might allow a younger designer like myself to help get the ball rolling more), and certainly the idea of a homestead might start out with a design, but be small enough to have a great portion of it be self-built. I don’t know what you have in mind precisely depending on site, money, and number of people, but you have an email to reach me by, I might just be able to give a couple useful design tips or more.

[Anonymous]

Grüß gott —

Please take a look at my profile. I also offer similar ideas for an independent community.

I know a group of young guys (different western europeans) who bought a small homestead / farm property in Denmark and who are sympathetic towards white genocide, etc. Unfortunately, I do not find them suitable to join as I am not impressed by their sense of realism in their venture. However, one of them has lots of capital for the purchase of the land.

Personally — I will have a good amount of capital to work with in the near future, suitable for purchase of a homestead, but not enough to purchase a village (of course, unless we are talking about Eastern Europe)

I am considering different models for the community and “center”. I also realize that certain compromises are necessary when starting out — “Rome wasn’t built in a day”

Tschüss

[Anonymous]

Wrong topic. I don’t want to work together with Satanists or beg for them, because they are a majority. I want to break free! Therefor an independent country is needed, where every coin goes to the right project. What or whom do you support with your (tax payers) money and the politicians you didn’t have voted for?

[Anonymous]

If even just 20 gainfully employed families moved into a small rural town, they could start to have a strong influence on the local community and lead it in the correct direction. I’m convinced that this is the only way things will work out for us: Like-minded people moving to small towns and proselytizing the good word of White pride to help those good people shed the scales of White guilt from their eyes.

[Anonymous]

Well I can’t realize it on my own. But I offer some ideas.

[cheburashka]

Well this is quite bold…
Would have to have enough people on board to do that.

[Anonymous]

For right-patriots and nationalists
White edelweiss
Town & country project
https://t.me/edelweisswarriors

[Anonymous]

– an army and gun owners to protect us

[Anonymous]

– schools, (biological) farms, water supply, power station (Nikola Tesla), new tested inventions, supply unit (for emergencies), banks (for the savings)
– near a natural forest, lakes, a river, brook and a second town/country could even be near a sea

[Anonymous]

We should make a donation pot. Maybe an independent rich investor could support this realization.

We need workers from every direction: bakers, hairdressers, shoemakers, traditional fashion designers, traditional architects, kindergarten teachers, garbage men, lawyers, judges, politicians,…
A uniform townscape, but the area should be split into male (nordic symbols, cold stone buildings) and female areas (flower symbols, mild colors, embellishments), to not weaken the inhabitants.

[Anonymous]

Build by strong men, also to protect the weak from discrimination against whites. A group has the right to survive as a race. – > White genocide

[Author]

Posts