Who we are and how we define ‘white’

[Antanas]

Some people might want to read Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, and watch the following: https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/ . It seems people have been brainwashed, miseducated in ways hardly imaginable, and they not just believe this “master race” nonsense, but they spread it like it was some popular belief and even an official policy in Germany. The only race that actually thinks it is superior are the Jews only. They treat other races as animals.

Germans never believed that other people are animals that must be slaughtered. It was on the contrary. Other races were treated with more dignity and respect than they were treated in the United Kingdom, United States or Soviet Union.

Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf made the following main points about racial differences:
1. He distinguished three groups of people. Into creators, supporters and destroyers. For him, all Whites were creators. About Nordics, he mentioned very rarely, but there is nothing from his book you can take as thinking that nordics are the “master race”. Most of his focus was on Germany’s unification, and saving European civilization from its destruction.

2. About Slavs, he wrote their immigration is the problem for the Austro-Hungarian empire, and because of that it will eventually collapse through being unable to address the issues of all people. It is not the same as saying that slaves must be destroyed. It was just a fact of previous days which only a fool could overlook. The same way as the fool overlooks the fact that invasion of other races into Europe is the biggest problem of our civilization today which must be dealt with immediately.

Then, there is no document that Adolf Hitler intended to destroy the Slavs, Baltics or other White European people. Adolf Hitler actually saved millions of these people. Probably, Lithuania would not even exist today if Adolf Hitler would not have liberated this country, since Stalin from day one started deportation, mass killings and denationalization of Lithuanians. The same goes for Estonians and Latvians. Only because the USSR after WWII became quite weak, Balts were able to ferociously resist this evil empire, and save their nations from total destruction.

Stalin had these plans to destroy other nations and enslave the whole world. He was quite open about it. And he not just implemented his own plans, but also he used all his influence and trickery to blame the Germans for this during the war when he saw that the Third Reich was going to wipe out the Soviet evil empire otherwise. For instance, there is the following order of Stalin that was even confirmed by the Russian FSB:
1. http://nseuropa.blogspot.com/2013/12/fackelmannerbefehl-torch-men-order.html
2. http://www.renegadetribune.com/stalins-torch-men-order-soviet-soldiers-disguised-in-german-uniforms-ruthlessly-murdered-civilians/

The idea of this order was for soviet terrorists (of whom there were majority of Jews) to imitate Germans, so people would believe the Germans are burning their villages, so they would be more willing to support USSR instead of the Third Reich. You see, no one actually supported the USSR, thus the only way to get support for the USSR was to show somehow that Germans were even worse than the Soviets. This is how these myths about “master race” or destruction of Slavs, Balts came into fruition. Using this order, the following atrocities were executed:
1. About a quarter of the population in Belarus was killed.

2. Katyn massacre.

3. Burning the village of Pirčiupiai in Lithuania. Up to this day, Pirčiupiai is still blamed on Germans, but there is no direct proof for that, only the self-contradicting tales of some people and bought mainstream historians who ignore other people who actually really believe and have some basis regarding Pirčiupiai.

4. Thousands of other villages burned.

5. Falsification of documents which were provided to the Nuremberg trials as “proofs” of the German atrocities. Most of the documents were so lousily falsified that even the paper format differed from the one that Germans used in their administrative matters! And it seems no one cares about this fact that single-handedly destroys the whole Soviet propaganda machine against Germany!

Adolf Hitler and the official policy of the Third Reich definitely did not treat any race or subgroup of Whites as inferior. Wanting that people in Germany would be Germans is not some sort of racism that Jews try to scream about. Actually, some of the Jews themselves helped the National Socialists write the racial Third Reich laws. And today, Israel has even more brutal laws than Germany. Some Palestinians, Arabs genetically can be treated as Jews, but Israel would not accept such people for citizenship. On the other hand, people from Europe were eligible for citizenship in the Third Reich given the fact they were White and were willing to accept the law of the Third Reich.

Some people seem to be misguided and not knowing the real history of the Third Reich, and spread the lies of the Jewish zionists, Soviets and other trash whose goal is to do anything in their power to destroy our race. Also, it might be possible that this “nordic supremacism” is also a Jewish subversion against us. It seems very strange for me how this “nordic supremacism” even took fruit when Adolf Hitler himself did not give lots of attention to it. Maybe there were some NSDP members who supported it, but it clearly was not an official policy of the Third Reich. Even these members seemed to be more interested in our origins than actually implementing this “nordic supremacism”.

For our race to survive, we must first know the truth very well. For decades, our parents, grandparents, and us were brainwashed through education, and our sacred right to get the correct information about history was viciously violated. So, we have an obligation to fix our knowledge gaps and defects, so we would no longer be the mental slaves of the Jewish zionists. In order to know it, you just need to spend about 10-20 hours watching some videos, reading some books.

What to read and watch? I would suggest starting with the following:
1. Watch the movie “EUROPA: The Last Battle (2017)”: https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/ .
2. Read the Mein Kampf of Adolf Hitler.
3. Start regularly reading https://nationalvanguard.org/ . Here, you will find news correctly covered, also some education, either.
4. Please read the following which highlights perfectly how actually Adolf Hitler solved the economical, demographic problems of Germany: https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/02/now-our-gigantic-work-begins-hitlers-triumph-and-social-revolution/ . The solution was ingenious. So ingenious that even today any country can apply it.

After doing so, you will be already properly educated, and there will be completely nothing in this world which will be able to affect you and make a mental slave of you again. So, do it if you wish to become of free mind, or lurk in mental slavery forever.

[Ted]

Denis said

So where do the eastern europeans, the slavics fit it? I know the german nazis wanted to take out 50% – 100% of them (Generalplan Ost) for being an inferior species, and here it seems national socialists are saying slavics are white, and therefore are part of the family. Kind of confused

I hadn’t heard of Generalplan Ost before, looked into it, looks like the translation describes a plan to relocate 31 million Slavs to Siberia, rather than to murder them.

https://archive.org/details/GeneralplanOst/page/n1/mode/2up

[Ted]

Denis wrote:

So where do the eastern europeans, the slavics fit it? I know the german nazis wanted to take out 50% – 100% of them (Generalplan Ost) for being an inferior species, and here it seems national socialists are saying slavics are white, and therefore are part of the family. Kind of confused

Are Slav’s part of the family?
There’s a few different levels of resolution you can look at. Zoom out far enough, we’re all human. Look a little closer, and there’s White people. Look a little closer, you have “Western/Northern”, “Mediterranean”, and “Slavs” (and arguably Ashkenazi). You can zoom in about 3-4 more times before you get down to individual families.

From a Western European perspective, the Slav is a little different; some have hints of oriental eye shape, and their architecture plus some of their customs seem to have a tiny bit of Mongolia mixed in. They appear a bit cruder in their living standards, but they have achieved great feats of science, engineering, warfare, literature, and the arts.

The Western European might look at the Slav’s per-capita GDP, houses, or their AIDs rates, and feel themselves superior. However, It’s not the Slavs that are in eminent danger of losing control of their voting franchises to non-whites raised to hate them. What good is heightened abstract thinking if it’s put to the task of mental gymnastics to ignore racial realities? How could we really consider ourselves superior if we’re on track to die out first, due to an inherit vulnerability in our minds?

I consider Slavs to be at least cousins, and certainly within the White family.

NSDAP vs Slavs
Judging by Mein Kamph, there was a perspective in Germany at the time that while the Germans were chronically low on agricultural land and vulnerable to losing food imports (800,000 recently starved by the British blockade), the Slavs had vast tracts of excellent growing land that they poorly utilized due to lack of sophistication. Hitler asked “Why should a smarter people limit it’s numbers and be vulnerable to blockade, while there’s these nearby dumb people squandering their natural resources”? So, he fantasized about the Slavic areas in the near east being dominated and run by the Germans, who would trade them industrial goods for food, but keep the Slavs from making their own industrial goods. Judging by the book “Hitler’s table talk”, as the war progressed, Hitler began to speak of them less and less disparagingly.

After Germany’s borders fell to the Red army, the mostly Slavic soldiers not only went on a rape spree, but a murdering one against civilians, partly fueled by hate propaganda, but also by jealousy. They would invade a German town, find a house with wooden floors instead of dirt, and think this was the house of a local rich guy, only to later be utterly disparaged to discover that this was just an average German home. It was a small problem for the Soviet Union right after the war because their soldiers had been raised to think the West was just a handful of super rich people oppressing the masses (who needed socialist liberation), those oppressed masses weren’t supposed to be living better than them. A friend of mine that reads a lot of history said this resulted in a lot of people getting sent to the Gulag to prevent demoralization back in the motherland.

• This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by Ted. Reason: I hit "reply" to Denis, but nothing showed up in the message indicating it was a reply

[Hunter]

“The great civilizations of Europa didn’t start with the Nordics, but with the Southern Europeans.” Actually, the ancient Greeks and Romans were far more White than they are today, and a commonly held pre-Christian myth stated that the ancestors of the classical Greeks were refugees from Hyperborea and Atlantis (and the Romans refugees from the Greek Kingdom of Lydia—the capital Troy is better known). Blondes and redheads were common in ancient Rome and Greece. Greece was conquered by the non-White Turks and so has some non-White patrilineal heritage. Hispania (Spain and Portugal) was mostly conquered by the non-White Arabs and so has some non-White patrilineal heritage. Persia was a White country (actually one of the first Aryan homelands) before the Arab conquest but was subjugated more severely than Hispania and Greece. The Roman Empire itself had its own history of racial decline and fall, although not nearly as severe as today. Semites most definitely should not be considered ‘White’ and that includes Jews and Arabs. White actually means Aryan. Eastern Europeans have varying degrees of patrilineal Asiatic (mostly Mongol) heritage. In conclusion, like almost everything else in the natural world, there is a spectrum of ‘Whiteness.’

[Anonymous]

Denis, clearly the Nordicism ideology ( Gunther’s theory about the “superior race” ) is flawed in many ways. The great civilizations of Europa didn’t start with the nordics, but with the Southern Europeans, and in recent times it proved once more that the Eastern Europeans and the Southerners are the shield of Europa once more. The thing is, going to this “extreme” ethnic nationalistic mindset is wrong, it only leads to hated and violence. Anyone that’s a neo-nazi is an enemy to all of Europe, and you can compare them to Marxists if you would like. Talked to a lot of these “said people” , and many share this view that non-Germanic people are “inferior” in a way or another, although I do agree that not all Nat-Soc had this mindset back in the day, it was a view believed by some members of the party.

The subject of “Who is more European/white than the other” is much more complex than it looks like. Migrations/invasions and whatnot happened everywhere and still occur to this day. Look at the Balkans ( Turkic invasions especially ) , or the Eastern lands of Europe ( Mongoloid influence / Turkic included ) , or the Southern lands ( the Arabic influence ).

[Anonymous]

So where do the eastern europeans, the slavics fit it? I know the german nazis wanted to take out 50% – 100% of them (Generalplan Ost) for being an inferior species, and here it seems national socialists are saying slavics are white, and therefore are part of the family. Kind of confused

[Antanas]

Do we have a word for non-Jewish white person? White gentiles? (makes it sound like merely a religious difference, unfortunately)

Yes, we do. Aryan. And these so-called Ashkenazis are just a subversion against us, so we would believe they are somehow similar to us. If someone is a Jew, then such person knows perfectly well what he/she is, and the role assigned to such person by their superiors. They are organized parasites who want to eradicate our race or at least enslave it enough, so we would do whatever they want us to do, we would hate us for who we are, and we would pass this hate to our own children.

[Ted]

the “white” label allows the Jews to go under the “white” umbrella, do something that makes whites look bad, then come out from under the “white” umbrella

They do this, and of course they really hate it when white people claim to be Jewish.

Do we have a word for non-Jewish white person? White gentiles? (makes it sound like merely a religious difference, unfortunately)

I’ve read that 80% of Ashkenazis’ racially distinctive DNA is European, so they do have a claim on being white, but I imagine they cause ~95% of the social turmoil by light skinned westerners, so we could use a handy word to say we disclaim them as “ours”.

[DaintyLady]

Let me add that the “white” label allows the Jews to go under the “white” umbrella, do something that makes whites look bad, then come out from under the “white” umbrella and say, “Look at what these bad whites did.” The MSM won’t say that a criminal is Jewish because that would be anti-Semitic, but they will say the criminal is “white” so that all European ethnicities under the “white” umbrella will be blamed. An example is what they did in brainwashing everyone to believe that slavery in America was the fault of whites. As explained in “We Thought They Were White” by Dontell Jackson and other sources, the slave-dealers and slave-masters were Jewish, but the Jewish-controlled educational system and Jewish-controlled Hollywood lie and say the slave-dealers and slave-masters were white Europeans. My ancestors did not own slaves and, as sharecroppers, were little more than slaves themselves, but starting in elementary school I was made to feel guilty for slavery because I’m white. I understand now that I was made to feel guilty for the Jews’ crimes. Meanwhile, the Jew steps out from under the white umbrella and says, “I’m just white-passing. I’m not really white. I’m Jewish. I’m not bad like the white people.” When in reality, all these crimes blamed on the white people were done by Jews.

[Ted]

Could it be that by identifying as white in today’s world, we are agreeing to give up our specific ethnicity for this umbrella term that is constantly being vilified by the Jewish elites

Yes, but it also gives us a big tent to unite under. I’d gladly lump in with all Aryan peoples for the purpose of mutual survival.

Jews in America around the 1870’s through 1930’s pushed hard for Mediterranean and Slavic immigration to reduce Anglo-Saxon / Teutonic Protestant unity, even accusing people of being “Anglo-Saxon supremacist” or “Teutonic supremacist” in the late 19th century with precisely the same intonation they use today for “white supremacist” when we publicly express our group interests (according to Henry Ford’s The International Jew). This effort is why the “melting pot” notion of America was popularized by Jews. Disunity in a host country is what Jews are evolved to promote so they can better exploit their host without being stopped.

By the mid to late 20th century, distinctions such as “Italian” or “Russian” meant little socially in America for purposes of reproductive choice. “White” peoples from all backgrounds seem to assimilate quickly and produce higher-functioning citizens than various “brown” peoples. As such, while I’d like to preserve the unique characteristics of my sub-race, I think a homogenized “white race” that unites for it’s collective interest is the better bet for survival and prosperity than being a purist about the diversity that is erased by the blanket term “white”.

By agreeing to be labeled white, are we agreeing to be the villains in their fictional story?

We could try switching to a term that’s been less dirtied lately, such as “Aryan”, or “Europeans”. Normally it doesn’t last very long to switch away from a stigmatized name, because the same things that dirtied it last time still apply. “Progressive” vs “liberal” have completed at least two cycles, each lasting around 1 or 2 generations. However, when the negative reputation is upheld by a propaganda campaign, that means all their work goes away if they don’t diligently link the new label to the previously vilified one. Since they literally control the money supply, they will have the resources to do that, but at least it could cost them time; propaganda needs focus, playing whack-a-mole with too many topics weakens all the messages.

[DaintyLady]

I don’t see a way to edit my post, but in paragraph 7, I meant to type, “Would dating sites be accused of being racist if they were called,” not “is they were called.”

[DaintyLady]

This is a very interesting topic to me lately. As someone who has Italian in me, I found the following article by an Italian-American group explaining why they believe Italians are not white but Latin:

https://italianaware.blogspot.com/2014/02/are-italians-white-part-1.html

And I took note of a comment underneath the article where someone pointed out this article:

The Invention of Hispanics

Quote from the article: “Before 1970, the US Census Bureau classified Mexican, Cuban and Puerto Rican immigrants as whites. Each community of Latin American origin would go by their nationality and by the region where they lived in the United States.”

So, according to those two articles, Italians used to be labeled non-white, while Mexicans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans used to be labeled white. But now Italians are labeled white, and Mexicans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans are labeled non-white.

I’m going to throw out some ideas as food for thought.

Nordic people look a lot different from Italian people, but nowadays they’re all considered white, even though Italians used to be considered non-white. Doesn’t that seem arbitrary?

Could it be that the label “white” was invented to lump all Europeans of different ethnicities together for the purpose of vilifying us and targeting us for genocide? Would dating sites be accused of being racist is they were called EuropeanDate, EuropeanAmericanDate, EnglishDate, IrishDate, GermanDate, ItalianDate, etc.?

The generic term “white” enables ethnic groups to be added and subtracted from it. You can say Italians are white or not white, but you can’t say Italians are not Italians. And Jewish people identify as white when they want to and as non-white when they want to. Why don’t we all return to identifying ourselves by our respective ethnicities instead of identifying ourselves as whites? And those of us who are a mixture of European ethnicities could just identify as European or European-American.

Could it be that by identifying as white in today’s world, we are agreeing to give up our specific ethnicity for this umbrella term that is constantly being vilified by the Jewish elites who have taken control of the banking system, governments, media, medical industry, etc? What we really have here is Jewish supremacy, but we constantly hear them harping about white supremacy. However, we never hear them talk about Italian supremacy, Irish supremacy, Dutch supremacy, etc. By agreeing to be labeled white, are we agreeing to be the villains in their fictional story? They are trying to brainwash everyone to hate whites. Why are we agreeing to their generic, de-ethnicized label for us? The hatred they are heaping on this label is now off the charts. Just some ideas to think about…

[WesternEuropeanUSA]

Great post. More like this!

[Armanen]

Hailsa Folk, to me I found that “White” is the term properly fitted to those Caucasians who are not racially conscious. For those of us who are racially conscious are called Aryan. What is missing from the race-soul is what’s called Vril, the Life Force of the Gods, what science calls “Black Matter.” God, the All-Father, is the Life Force, and is unique to only the Aryan race. This is why only the Aryan’s throughout history have built great civilizations, language, art, poetry, religions, monuments, etc. So have faith my Folk, grasp the race-soul and become an Aryan. Wotan’s blessings, Sunny sunnylokison101@gmail.com

[Anonymous]

Absolutely we as whites have the right to maintain our white heritage.
A great website that I frequent is made possible by a gentleman by the name of Jared Taylor. This man speaks the truth about the need for whites to maintain thier own heritage and identity.

[Anonymous]

They only people who are questioned about their race is white people the reason that doesn’t work for other races is because they haven’t been indoctrinated to hate their own i can remember from my school in Puerto Rico they wanted to teach us the we should be proud of being mix black, Indian and Spanish white (even do its not true for everybody) and what I’ve seen is that a people united in a common identity cannot be divided, they even tried to show that racism was still a alive here but because of what i mentioned before people didn’t by into it, once people develop a sense of identity its pretty hard to take it away from them.

[Anonymous]

We are the descendant of the European tribes listed on this map from 52 BC.

We are the people from Celtic, Germanic, Finno-Ugric, Baltic, Slavic and Italic stock. We are the ‘Europides’ only partially defined by the terms ‘Indogermanic’ which is a linguistic, not genetic category nor  ‘Caucasian’/ ‘Caucasoid’ that includes several ethnicities we would not feel much belonging to due to phenotype, linguistic, religious and cultural differences.

We are the so called ‘Whites’ to distinguish us from ‘Blacks, ‘Latinos’, ‘Asians’, ‘Indians’, ‘Arabs’ and other terms defining ethnic in-groups.

Over centuries our men have created and invented architecture, machines, medical and electronic devices, literature, music and fashion that has shaped most parts of the world. Just think about whatever technical device you are using on a daily basis and research by whom its prototype was invented: Very often you will find a white man.

Like all other ethnic groups whites too have the right to preserve their heritage. Like all other ethnic groups whites too have the right to practicing in-group preference when it comes to association and dating. Unfortunately the right to free association has been taken from us by several of our governments and we are not happy about that.

Realizing the disastrous impact these political decisions had and will have on our way of life, our prosperity and especially our security, we claim our right to practice in-group preference like all the other ethnicities naturally do for dating, socializing, collectivizing, and lobbying: Equal rights for everybody.

[Author]

Posts