[DigitalWestern]

Well stated Jonathan, and thank you for the reply. The double standards regarding what is permissible for blacks vs. whites really are incredible. Blacks seem completely oblivious or indifferent to expressing racial bigotry towards others, while simultaneously interpreting every slight no matter how minor as proof of “racism” against them. They are instructed to behave like this by Zio-Marxist popular culture, i.e. multinational media corporations owned and operated by Jewish ethnocentrists.

[DigitalWestern]

@Benjamin Thank you for sharing! God’s blessings be upon you.

[DigitalWestern]

Hosting a website costs money. Maintaining a feature-rich website (messages, profiles, login/logout, session data, responsive layout, image uploads, bandwidth, etc.) requires a great deal of expertise in full-stack web development; if you don’t have those skills yourself, you have to either learn (no small task) or pay somebody to build your spec.

The fact whitedate.net is online is pretty remarkable, given that any form of white solidarity is seen as the most dangerous form of terrorism possible. So, there are a number of factors working against the site:

(a) most white people, at least in the United States, have been trained from birth to see a positive white racial identity as the worst of all possible sins;

(b) among those who have rejected ethnomasochism, most recognize that publicly expressing white racial solidarity is a one-way ticket to becoming permanently unemployable and losing your entire social circle;

(c) because most of the internet now is dominated by organizations who repeat the mantra that white racial solidarity is an unforgivable crime (“white silence is violence”), whitedate.net is unable to advertise on normal channels;

(d) because whitedate.net is trafficking in essentially forbidden politics, finding developers to work on the site is another uphill battle, as many developers are also fully committed to the eradication of whiteness, and will share the mainstream belief that any form of positive white identity is essentially terrorism.

Given these, I would say it’s about a 70/30 split between: whitedate.net is ran by one white person or a small group of white people who reject the conditioning of self-hatred and want their people to exist and prosper, and are fighting to keep the site afloat and recoup their expenses in any way possible; and the alternative, which is that it’s a honeypot meant to gather intel on (in the eyes of the regime) the most dangerous political enemies on the planet.

[Author]

Posts