[Oscar]

“whether they ultimately decide to invite me back in or hire me following it, once they become aware of my race/ethnicity. ”

how could they before you told them you identify as a black-filipino (1/16th cherokee) disabled lesbian (on mondays, the rest of the week, you’re just the usual pharaoh Kephren in your Detroit space pyramid)

I’m dead serious, if you don’t really expect to be hired, just troll them with Black Panther salute in your rasta wig and panafrican colors matching your Saint George (Floyd) hoodie. If you don’t risk anything socially, even try the blackface !

Be a serious bitch-ass nigga.

[Oscar]

“How much of your time alive are you willing…”

“Everybody has a plan until they get punched by the circumstances of life” (Almost) Mike Tyson.

(I see there is progress on the forum, we can at last now read page 2, even if a non-binary/chronologic way (Autist-Elon has obviously not yet reached WD), 2025 will be a great year.)

[Oscar]

September 11, 2024 at 5:48 pm: “I’m off ”

Resolution of the highest order for the new Mucius Scaevola.

“Nice omission of my argument (which you still refuse to address) that Europeans changed Christianity ”

as I’ve previously said, despite your intellectual-coated verbiage, you often lack basic knowledge on the notions you deal with

christianity is not “a judaism that has been europeanized”, christianity is a religion that uses a figure rejected from the jewish world – jesus – but in a world shaped and governed by europeans: he lived in the roman empire, was put to death by roman soldiers and the man who promoted it, saul/paul, rejected judaism in favour of roman citizenship.

Jesus is the figure around whom Christianity was organised, but it could have been a completely different spirituality that could have served as the basis for the search for a new, more interior religiosity than the Greco-Roman civic cults, such as Mithra, one of the Eastern mystery cults that spread widely among the Roman military caste (altars found in Gaul and on the banks of the Rhine, along the Limes).

And Mithra(ism) is Iranian, and therefore Indo-European, and therefore has no connection whatsoever, not even a symbolic one, with the Abrahamic world that you fetishise enough to imagine that its corrosive power would lead to a millennium and a half of European civilisation being thrown in the bin (a fairly common case of certain anti-Semitic people over-valuing the Jews, which has more to do with pathology than political rationality).

“you’re far from the intended audience”

you mean, other than yourself ?

“You’d get kicked out of a high-school debate club”

Wisdom starts when you don’t engage in the dick contests you’ve already lost before to begin: “aeonknight Education Level: College Degree”

[Oscar]

“attraction to post-menstrual females is not pedophilia”

if a female can have it at 12, yes it is. And, by luck it’s not only the position of the sane, decent, part of the population but also of the criminal justice and we expect it to deal swiftly with the freaks who fantasize anything else.

In any case, as I’ve already written, this pseudo-debate is of no interest whatsoever: our problem is not ‘children who could be mothers’, but this decade of female procreation between the ages of 20 and 30 that has disappeared in the space of two generations since the boomers.

If we find a way to refind it, then there’s no longer a demographic problem and some people won’t have to lurk at the kiddos and pretend they’re acting in the name of a higher interest.

[Oscar]

“I kind of wanted to cry”

If replacing pews with chairs has such an effect on you, I might wait to talk to you about the Great Replacement of Europe’s peoples…

it’s funny that you think that pews are an intrinsic part of the identity of churches, because for centuries churches didn’t actually have pews or chairs, and the closest thing they were would be a shopping mall: people went in and out of church at will, they ate there and did their business there.

In fact, it was from the Protestant Reformation onwards that the post-Council of Trent Church began to see much longer sermons that forced parishioners to sit down.

The seats in the church were rented out and therefore marked by a clear social structure.

In fact, the pews already marked a certain levelling out because before, the most privileged people had their own private prie-dieu (i.e. chairs) in the front rows.

There was a bit of controversy over the choice of liturgical furniture for the restoration of Notre-Dame, but chairs are incomparably more practical for regular use.

[Oscar]

“, while I agree from a biological standpoint, my morals dictate that progenators of this ideal should be castrated”

Yes, I’ve noticed that this crypto-pedo pseudo-scientific discourse is becoming more and more widespread, claiming to find the answers to all our problems in the strict biological (one could even say ‘physiological’) substratum alone.

in fact, as the social behaviour of the masses moves further and further away from what would be necessary (my mother’s generation had their children at 20 for the first, and 30 for the last, which largely ensured generational renewal and even slight growth), we are seeing a discourse of opposite radicalisation, which will obviously have no major effect on the populations we wish to reach.

Man is a social animal, women are not hens who have acquired all their survival behaviours even before they reach sexual maturity… if the human species has become the master of the planet, it’s precisely because it has complexified its social organisation far beyond simply meeting natural needs.

[Oscar]

” are at least nominally christian. ”

it’s not a question of theology or beliefs – most Christians today are largely secularised and it’s fair to say that even theological dogmas are not widely shared by those who call themselves believers.

What I was pointing out as stupid arrogance and a political impasse that leads to useless divisions is this tendency to attack head-on the most deeply held beliefs of certain individuals when these do not have a direct impact on our interests: if certain racial realists use the Christian faith as spiritual support, why is that our problem?

Attacking the globalist message of Bergoglio’s church because it assumes to be directly hostile to us is perfectly justified, but it does not oblige us to provoke some of our own, and even less so to consider that the central heritage of Christianity in European civilisation counts for nothing and should be scorned.

“I’ve heard that the odd one might try to convert you”

non-existent issue. even in XIXth century when religion was really a thing, no women would have tried to get that kind of control of male (with the offspring, that would be different)

the only kind of “love djihad” that exists is among muslims : women tends to get non-muzz males to be converted, but it’s mostly because it’s a legal issue : female muzz can’t marry non-muzz while the opposite is allowed. For the males the phenomemnom exists in India and Pak-pak, but anyways it’s of no consequence because islam has nothing to do with Whites.

[Oscar]

So, tu summarize your self-convinced nonsense :

1) the real White race existed only before the seduction of this “jewish mystery cult”.

2) the huh-white race despite being the strong followers of the eternal Laws-of-Nature-which-never-lies-or-fails, based who exposed their ill children on hills to die still felt for a basic schlomo trick

3) yep, race-mixing existed as much when the huh-white race were the sons of the eternal Laws of Nature (which never lies or fails), but that doesn’t count, because it wasn’t because of jewish trick-inspired “universalism” just because of the normal drive to conquer (yes your offspring has the same weird face but at last you didn’t fall for some jewish trick, get it, noob ?)

4) everything beautiful, good and great that has been generated during the millennium and a half in which the “slave morality” has corrupted the spirit of the huh-whites, has been generated only because the light of European genes has always pierced through the mists of Semitism. Christianity therefore in the same time corrupted the huh-white man, but did not alter his Appolinian impulse.

5) yes, the Semitic corruption of Christianity is expressing itself now that we live in largely secularized societies that have broken with this same religion in their moral and legal foundations.

6) no, all the measures taken over the centuries in societies shaped by Christianity to prevent the mixing of races and to keep Jews at a distance mean nothing (cf. point no.4)

Curiously, you’ve not yet converted me, and I’m not even a believer.

But it seems yourself are : “Did you somehow understand that Nature forbids evil,”

I have a revelation to make to you: Nature defends neither good nor evil, it statistically produces all the combinations that are offered to it. if this weren’t the case, the inferiors, both on the cognitive or physical level would have already disappeared from the face of the earth through a continuous process of improvement over thousands of years.

and we’d have been spared your pseudo-Nietzschean pensum.

[Oscar]

ad hominem, no arguments, we already knew that.

btw, where did I ever pretend that christianity would provide excellence among africans ?

No I certainly didn’t we’ll agree, you just tried to forge a point

“as you haven’t a single clue what my position is,”

I just commented it and all its whitekandian nonsense

in fact your problem is that you invoke concepts that you do not really master

for example:

how does judaism introduce “universalism”? (I think that in general they are criticized a little, and rightly so, for extracting themselves by supposed Yahwic right from the rest of humanity to place themselves above it. We could, if need be, evoke the Christian (and Mohammedan) case proclaiming the communion of at least all believers (in the face of the rest of the world) but fifteen centuries of bloody struggles and two world wars between Whites have demonstrated that sharing the same religion had had little operational effect compared to the usual logics of power, and therefore could not in all intellectual honesty serve as an act of accusation of the aforementioned religion.

But tell me, super-Nazi “who does not hide your head in the sand” you, enlighten me with your irreproachable and irrefutable nat-soc logic: was Alexander of Macedonia a Christian?

No, it seems to me, right. And did not this empire without Abrahamic inspiration have a little titillated the claim to the universal if his warriors had not whistled the end of the game in the middle of Pajeetland?

in case it was missing from your education of the happy pre-abrahamic times when the white race was strong, proud and above all pure, the first act of his government was to marry persian princesses, Roxane then Statira, right?

it seems that he did not need to be corrupted by the abrahamic venom to fuck sandniggerettes, Muh-Alexander, the original coalburner. and if only it was only him, but he had his entire army unite with everything that had a vagina in the achaemenid empire.

it is a pity that the mediocrity of historical facts does not come close to your implacable marmoreal reasoning of the “Laws of huh-Nature”

and by the way since you speak of an Abrahamism which would have introduced into our heads the poison of “slave morality” should we conclude that slavery was born with Christianity or that this human institution did not produce any kind of morality since its creation and its application to all the civilizations of the planet?

so, you recycle a lot of preconceived ideas, clichés and sophisms, but nothing that resists a little analysis, especially when one is actually two decades ahead in terms of reflections and learning (and perhaps one has also made better use of them)

and since your sensitivity as an Aryan uber-warrior has been hurt in your little beating heart by the term “dago” (to which I did not wish to give an insulting coloring, but just slangish one) I will conclude by advising you to meditate on the words of a great French writer, author of “the genius of Christianity” and ultimate lover of Italy:

“the ambition for which one does not have the talent is a crime”

[Oscar]

“Even less so is people constantly pointing out topics they don’t like being discussed.”

I have a pretty clear memory of a discussion exactly like this when I was moderating the site, and an equally clear memory that you were able to repeat these arguments word for word.

If the discussion was worth looking into, it would be enough to bring out the thread and we would read exactly what was written here, and what will be written in the next messages.

An argumentative version of the film “Groundhog Day” and that would probably save us precious time. With age, one become stingy with wasted time and useless gestures.

I have read this kind of stupid debate – and which will never be resolved – in all the nationalist spheres that I have had to frequent since… since the age when you were still shitting in your diapers (I also remember having already told you that, word for word… (you see, really “groundhog day”…)

what people like you** (**you in the sense of a archetypal figure of the luminous discoverer of THE true, eternal and marmoreal Truth before which all – huh-White – Humanity will bend in order to finally be able to rebuild THE perfect society conceived in an implacable rationality from finally eternal foundations – Raus, the provisional that has lasted since the Neolithic!) do not understand – and will never understand because you defend a psychological position of Torquemada more than a precise ideological content, is that we win in politics by aggregating people on the essential problems, not by seeking to merge experiences and paths by nature, relevant to statistical infinity.

what is really stupid and philosophically as well as historically illiterate is to claim that the European society that has existed for nearly two millennia, not only marked, but shaped by Christianity in its various traditions, would be a fraud and an incident.

Myself, apart from the Greek episode and its roman offspring, I have a little trouble knowing what a “European civilization” would be without Charles Martel, Charlemagne and the crusaders, without Notre-Dame as without Hagia Sophia or the Sistine Chapel, without the thousands of paintings and sculptures dedicated until modern times very largely to religious subjects, without Bach, without Charpentier’s Te Deum, the Requiems of Mozart, Brahms or Fauré, or the hymns to the cherubims of Tchaikovsky

it’s funny because reading you, I have the impression of having to those enlightened evangeli-my-ass rednecks who repeated on breitfart that “Catholicism had nothing to do with Christianity”, without being really able to explain how Christianity would have worked between the period of the apostles and that of the Reformation.

in short, paradoxically, you are taking up the argumentative framework of the biggest ass-lickers of jooz there are, which was probably not your initial goal.

finally, if you want to convince yourself that the average dago continues to secretly sacrifice to Jupiter Capitolinus and that Marian medals are in fact invocations to Demeter or Terpischore, that’s your problem, but if I were you, I wouldn’t put too much time and energy into it, it’s a luxury we as a whole no longer have, and that’s precisely why a site like WD offers the widest range of options in terms of political and intellectual approaches, because what matters, right now, is to close ranks, not to act like a right-wing Trotskyist.

[Oscar]

rather than essays – in which you will often find only what you wanted to find when you bought them, I recommend in terms of proselytism, to distribute literature around you, which is a more seemingly harmless means of access, and therefore more effective. to non-politicized individuals who would tend to reject any attempt at open indoctrination

these novels are enough mainstream to be publicized but still have a deep political meaning that cannot fail to produce effects on its readers

The Camp of the Saints (1973) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints

Ashes, ashes (1943 – Ravage for the original title) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashes,_Ashes

and , of course, any of Houellebecq’s books who are even more mainstream and which are therefore the most effective attack on contemporary Western nihilism among normies

[Oscar]

about books, I’ve a post under moderation because of simple wiki links. it’s insane. I’ve made a post hoping that Liv would take care of that (allow in advance certain sites defined as not posing potential problems for fedpost, and wikipedia or youtube are among them), but it seems that she has not seen it yet.

[Oscar]

Yes I know about Luther’s commentsd about Jews, but Lutherianism isn’t the sole doctrine within the protestantism and Calvinism but alos puritanism (at least since Cromwell) had deeper connection with the tribe (who funded the little voyage of William to overthrow the Catholic Stuart)

if modern catholocism is totally aligned on the oxymoron of “judeo-christianism” (sic), remember, until Vatican II, there was a “prayer for the perfidious jews”

Again I’m in no way in defense of what has become catholicism, but it’s obvious that protestantism in the US has opened the way for the supremacy of jewry : the use of ancient testament names by the protestants, the use of circumcision – something totally inexistent in Europe, the importance of the old testament among protestants while catholicism is centered on the life of jesus and the apostles

all this has created a mental permeability with the Jewish narrative clearly stronger in the Protestant world than in that of Catholicism and Orthodoxy.

[Oscar]

These disputatio between Christians/paganists/atheists are of an interest inversely proportional to their perpetual resurgence: may that everyone prospers according to the moral codes they have defined for themselves, in keeping with their national environment and individual background.

i think even the most exalted can understand that the risk of converting and overturning the most established foundation of one’s thinking through a few messages of internet conversation with a stranger is about as likely as the chosenites one day becoming genuinely interested in the survival of the european race (i generally try not to use the expression “white race”, due to the damaging influence of american classifications which include in this concept caucaso-levantins wogs: Armenians, Jews, Chechens, and why not North Africans, with all of whom I have no desire to be associated).

as long as individuals /groups produce a social environment that instills the idea of the perennity, transcendence and survival imperative of the group to which they belong, they’re part of the solution, whether they’re believers in one of the spiritualities that shaped their ethnic group, or atheists/agnostic materialists.

Having said this, it’s clear that the Catholic Church in its current official structure can only be seen as a direct enemy of our interests. Catholics with a political conscience know this and draw the consequences (sedevacantism, entryist strategy to regain control of the apparatus from progressive boomers, separatism by withdrawal into a religiosity with a totally personal and family vocation).

in any case, there is no point in wanting to throw the baby out with the bathwater and the Christianity that has served as a political and moral framework for Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire is no more stupid than LARPing by invoking gods who have been dead for twenty centuries

“but I am also of the suspicion that Christianity is merely a rebranding of Judaism for goyim to welcome Jewish supremacism.”

replace christianity with protestantism and you could be true. Until the XXth century, the catholic church (and I believe orthodoxy too) was very wary of the tribe, unlike the fascination of the ‘heretics’ for the Ancien Testament (you just have to see the choice of first name in these two different cultural areas)

[Oscar]

“I was hoping Farage would become thir new PM”

Why, exactly ? Garage is a con-man, a sort of provincial version of Trump. His main achievement is to have stopped through Brexit the influx of European workers in Global Brexitannia so they could be replaced by Pajeets from Muh-Commonwealth (all time high since 2020)

typical clown for the flag-waving plebs still believing it’s the 50s

[Oscar]

bad link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHYu–E9ucI

[Oscar]

Since he died few days ago, nostalgia for a time when films could still promote something else than globo-homo parousia

and of course, so significant in this time : a civilization that disappears https://youtu.be/DHYu–E9ucI

“We were the Leopards, the Lions; those who’ll take our place will be little jackals, hyenas; and the whole lot of us, Leopards, jackals, and sheep, we’ll all go on thinking ourselves the salt of the earth.”

[Oscar]

“and since we are on the subject of unknown gems, it reminds me of this little nugget discovered as a child (lucky – or not – to have a father who is a cinephile and a film collector and inundated with films that are probably not necessarily within the reach of a kid like Doctor Mabuse)

History of the two kids who stole the moon (o dwóch takich co ukradli księżyc) a 1962 movie for kids ”

and I just forgot why I’ve quoted this probably unknown Polish film : one may have recognised the two kids as the Kaczynski twins who have governed Poland since the 2010s, one as president who died in his plane crash and the other as prime minister and boss of the Atlanticist cukservative party PIS

[Oscar]

“done with the technical means of its time.”

“old school” special effects before digital made them a smooth and charmless product had a freshness and sincerity of craftsmanship, I love the work of Ray Harryhausen (Jason, Sinbad, etc.), for example in Clash of the Titans it is generally rebroadcast at Christmas and as I irremediably broke with (((television))) more than twenty years ago, it is the moment when I can savor this Proust madeleine in family.

Really, it’s more impressive than any modern crap : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqRjDGAJ5dc

and since we are on the subject of unknown gems, it reminds me of this little nugget discovered as a child (lucky – or not – to have a father who is a cinephile and a film collector and inundated with films that are probably not necessarily within the reach of a kid like Doctor Mabuse)

History of the two kids who stole the moon (o dwóch takich co ukradli księżyc) a 1962 movie for kids

“a child’s version of the Lord of the Rings”

The novel (or more probably its film adaptation) has infused so many cultural references into the public débate that I will have to read it one day or later to find out exactly what it is.

[Oscar]

I understand the notion of op-sec for the site but the systematic pre-validation of links to the site is annoying. After all, fedposting can simply be the act of writing, and in this case, moderation only intervenes a posteriori.

why not consider certain sites already (((heavily moderated))) like Youtube as safe and only subject of usual post-moderation ?

if it represents an impracticality, we can also imagine a status of “trusted commentator” who would be exempt from this pre-moderation and only subject to the usual a posteriori moderation regarding the links posted

(yes I believe I belong to this category)

and since we are at my wishlist, Liv, could you look to see the introduction on the comments space of usual writing tools (bold, underlined, italics quotes, etc)

it would greatly improve the practicality, the visibility of the writings, and therefore the general appeal of this part of the site.

[Oscar]

what ? this classic was forgotten ?

( don’t remember if it had any “pro-white” meaning , but at least no magic niglet and no mermaid with balls, that precious

[Oscar]

feminism IS marxism. Once the absolute failure of economic Marxism had been recognised, including by the countries that had applied it, the Marxist thought pattern based on the confrontation between the “dominant” and the “dominated” was projected onto the cultural and societal sphere, and was intended to never be contradicted because it was based on irrefutable biological differences: sex and skin colour.

Hence, The white man became the ‘bourgeois’ of the Negro, and the man that of the woman. There is NO point in supporting feminist dogma, since it is at the heart of the problem. You never win a war by promoting your enemy.

women are never going to break with the current misandrist dogma of their own accord, given that it gives them symbolic AND material benefits, since they are thus given access to a number of positions just because vagina (I’m not suggesting that women are inherently incapable, I’m just saying that they are promoted AS such, and that the demonstration of individual capacity has yet to be made, for example with differentiated physical tests in the army, as if bullets would travel more slowly to hit these little empowered females).

Here again, the precarious balance is only maintained by the spinelessness and wilful blindness of the intended target: the white man, summoned to participate in his own enslavement.

but if tomorrow the cops (the real ones, Robert and his big muscles, not the 50kg floozy who thinks we’ll automatically obey her because she’s got a badge) go on strike, that’s the end of this little moment of moral insanity that calls on us to avoid making fun of the Chinese red guards

another rebalancing factor is that mental feminism is opening the doors of our various countries to elements who have no intention of breaking with their civilisational environment which reduces women to cattle

this whole charade won’t last much longer

[Oscar]

women are socially conformist, for obvious evolutionary reasons. Unlike men, women have difficulty surviving outside a group. The very nature of human gestation, which is long and delicate in terms of the mother’s survival, and which produces new-born babies incapable of fending for themselves, means that the group, the social structure, is the natural survival strategy for them. It’s not a question of looking down on it, it’s a behavioural reality and therefore part of the equation.

where there is a ‘group’, there is a social consensus, norms, dogmas and taboos, so women will follow the dominant narrative for deep-seated reasons that have nothing to do with intrinsic adherence to the values of the time being conveyed (in France the Republicans long refused women the right to vote because they were more conservative and closer to the Church)

“the ‘opinion’ of women has never been of the slightest interest (and neither has that of most men), but the INSTINCTS of women make it possible to discern who will become a valuable companion

So one need to look at their attraction to motherhood, their links with their family, their relationship with nature, production and the utilitarian arts, rather than the ideological cloak they use to cover up these instincts.

prefer a thousand times any ‘normie’ or even semi-libshit in which you can discern healthy instincts, even if she takes up slogans of the moment or reflexes of pity that are so feminine (for the drowning or starving niglets who will never be able to invade Europe), to any ‘Aryan princess’ for whom political activism is a means of boosting narcissism as her age makes her less valuable on the sexual market, and probably also a financial status thanks to the wonderful world of ‘influencers’

[Oscar]

” buy weapons” i perfectly understand the theorical interest of having weapons (defending home from intruders etc) but simple question : do you REALLY believe that it’ll allow you to do something special in case of WW3 ?

if the shit hit the fan the best kind of security you’ll have is to have secured strong relations with trustable neighbours, because if YOU can buy guns, very numerous others can too.

the american fetishism about guns has proven the 6th of january how much bullshit it was the trumpists believe the election was stolen ( I don’t but that’s not the problem) and what happened then with the “400 mlillions of guns” ? nothing (or rather one woman killed by a badge nigger, a piece of lard died by heart attack and some average joe who’ll are experimenting what naivety in politics is paid cash while rotting for years in jail

[Oscar]

there is no such thing as “the best film” (ranking everything for no reason is probbaly the most unforgivable Murican sin) but there are films watchable by Whites, and what deserves a great bonfire

1) It is necessary to privilege European cinema from before the mid-80s which remained racially monochromatic, unlike Jewish Wood which had already imposed as an obligatory figure the usual “there are some good one” nigger (model created by Sidney Poitier and this repugnant film “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” (demonstrating that white America had capitulated morally in the 50s), to stick to the great project of desegregation which was the condition for Eisenhower’s United States to have the “moral” leadership to oppose the Soviet empire.

2) for the post-85 period, european cinema is generally aligned with its california (((cousins))) so the advice would be to look at the name of the director or producer and to throw out anything that has a polish or german sounding name

red flags: besides obviously any film including a black man in the lead role, even if he dies in the first quarter of an hour while showing his teasing friendship with the white hero (the one who will fuck the admiring woman), any woman in the main character (empowerment in slow motion), any jew whose name is written directly on the poster and not in the end credits

i would add one after having had glimpses of ridley scott’s calamitous “Napoléon”: throw away before consumption any production by a director who is over 70 years old. Films directors are NOT like great wines that become better after aging People of that age are already too inhabited by their own end to be able to produce anything meaningful. At best they will repeat and parody themselves

this is particularly the case with ridley scott when we compare with this pure masterpiece that he had made on the napoleonic era, and which was one of his first films

https://youtu.be/l2KWTEhyVX8

(yes I know Keitel is a (((tribeman))) but exceptions confirm the rule, rather than deny it, as everyone knows)

(in any case, cinema is a very overrated leisure activity, privilege – especially with children – literature which frees the imagination compared to the captive swallowing of animated images)

[Oscar]

I think the first move is to turn to a local farmer/peasant and ask him what grows best depending on where you live, in accordance with the climate and the terroir.

One must then concentrate on the products for which autonomy – therefore habitual use – is most necessary: ​​producing oneself does not generate any form of economy, quite the contrary: I have hens and when I see the time and energy that I devote to their maintenance, it is obvious that on a simple economic approach, I would be better off buying eggs at the nearby supermarket.

producing oneself serves to generate one’s own autonomy, to break with the reduction of all production to their simple cost dimension according to the (((capitalist))) approach, and also in an era of individual atomization of the society by (((consumerism))) to recreate through the exchange of these productions interpersonal links and therefore solidarities escaping a commercial relationship, as was the case in any Western rural society a few decades ago only.

[Oscar]

” In nature, it’s the alpha male ”

We ceased to be “in the nature”, eighty centuries ago. You speak about it as if this little thing called Civilization was a brief break in the normal course of things.

More, you have a very simplistic understanding of what is Darwinian selection and evolution : it is not a continuous process of eugenics through the selection of the best traits, but an infinite number of mutation possibilities at each generation, the best adapted to a given situation being passed on to the next generation.

if this were your Disney-esque vision, taking into account tens of thousands of years of “amelioration”, men would all look like schwarzenegger (and women like brigitte Nielsen, which is unfortunately not the case)

it’s a little more complex than that. Anyway, once again, I’m not trying to convince you, which is pointless since this is already your way of life and I don’t think you’re going to change it just because of an internet conversation with a stranger, but to remind you of some factual truths, to avoid this kind of false solution being presented as a panacea for our problems.

Your choice of lifestyle is obviously no more harmful than that of the average homo occidentalis, but it brings no comparative advantage to the entropic birth problem we have, where the birth rate is low because of the consumerist primacy, which itself is maintained by immigration, which increases the birth imperative of our own people.

We French lost our North-American empire to the British because we fought outnumbered 1 vs 17 (70 K colonists in New France, vs 1.2million in the 13 colonies) but the French-Canadians managed in 250 years to go from 60K settlers occupied by a foreign power to a people of over 7 million, which enabled them to resist all attempts at absorption by their English-speaking neighbors. Curiously, they were all monogamous.

[Oscar]

“Not everyone will get married ”

and that exactly the point. As I’ve said in my first comment just say you practise that because that your fetish and you live in a country that allowes every kind of it (it was funded this way)

what I can’t stand is the counter-factual nonsense of the pseudo-utilitarian alibi.

No, polygyny doesn’t help the demographic issue, in fact it’s the opposite:

1) it diminishes the stock of genetic variety, which is reduced by 50% for each child
2) it produces fewer children than monogamous couples who choose to have numerous offspring.
3) it provides fewer material and emotional resources for each child, since the “supervision” rate is mechanically lower.

“dating pool” means nothing : in their care home, grand-pas and grand-mas are “dating”, it won’t play any role in the demographic question.

again, facts :

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/South_Korea_Population_Pyramid.svg

I chose South Korea because if it is not a white country, it remains a Western country and its demographic structure is absolutely similar to that of any European country, with the added feature of to be the country on the planet most advanced in its demographic suicide (0.7 children per woman, i.e. 30% of what is required to just maintain the population at its level)

as I have already said and repeated, the so-called “surplus” of women only exists at the most advanced ages, after 40, where they cannot play any demographic role.

the REALITY is a male surplus, which exists for biological reasons and which for the part that interests us – the birth rate among whites with a political conscience – is further increased by the habitual adhesion of women (for reasons of evolutionary strategy ) to the paradigm in place, a paradigm which is obviously centered on our own erasure

So following a polygynous process only further increases the lack of women – and the male/female ratio on the site gives a very clear overview of this.

I add that in addition to the demographic realities previously highlighted, a polygynous practice has the first effect of reinforcing the feminine hypergamic logic – you have also admitted this yourself. So to strengthen cultural feminism – while claiming to destroy it – even though it is a central process of civilizational collapse.

so do what you want to do, but don’t pretend that this logic is positive for our fight in general, because it’s false.

[Oscar]

“when the majority either passively let them do it”

and that always what they do, because the Hoï polloï who has never opposed his own dispossession other than verbally is unlikely to put more energy into countering a movement aimed at re-establishing his symbolic and material situation.

Of course, it’s not a question of foolishly thinking that we’ll “convince” him in a democratic-type process where “the reaction” will take place when 50% of the sheep plus one vote adhere to the discourse, but just that if a revolutionary force is capable of :.

1) inspiring greater fear than that of the state apparatus
2) effectively replacing the state force in its role of organizing social life (provisioning, exercising justice and authority in the general sense), THEN the sheep-who-don’t-want-to-have-problems will rally to the process that has been installed.

that’s why the first enemy of any dissident is the state apparatus, and in particular its variable-geometry application of the legal monopoly of violence, and certainly not the nigga he wants to get rid of.

[Oscar]

“On my eugenics point, it is just that: eugenics, not populaton growth. Quality not quantity.”

You should have a look at Hegel : ” at a certain moment, quanitity becomes a quality by itself”

Eugenics are a pseudo-science. Eugenics were practised until the 80’s in Sweden and did it produce a better, stronger, smarter nation ?

No they’re at the forefront of the feminist discourse which is the central element of the current civilizational collapse and they were stupid enough to import the third world without even having the – relative – excuse of links to a colonial past or geographical proximity.

if a eugenics policy had been applied in Germany in the 1770s, Beethoven’s mother, who suffered from every conceivable physical and social defect, would have been sterilized.

and i love the second movement of the seventh symphony.

State laws must be eugenic in nature, i.e. they must aim to improve the state of society. For individuals (apart from the clinically retarded, who must obviously be sterilized), it’s a different matter.

“I said it ultimately didn’t benefit Europeans to be sent as cannon fodder”

the concept of cannon fodder here makes no sense. it’s an expression used to refer to people employed against their will and against their interests for third-party interests.

This is absolutely the opposite of what the Crusades were, which were a voluntary phenomenon that combined religious (to gain eternal salvation) and material interests (those who crusaded were cadets from noble families who would have had no future at home, which is the whole point of the creation of the Frankish States in the Levant).

[Oscar]

” but of low overall power from small numbers”

a punchline in one our 1950’s movie is “a walking idiot goes further than two sitting intellectuals”.

your approach sees the political question from an electoralist and democratic point of view (in the sense of aggregating the greatest number of individual wills).

History teaches us that it is first and foremost made by limited, coherent cohorts who know where they’re going.

the bolsheviks never had a majority in 1917’s Russia.

[Oscar]

“Should payments and compensation be given?”

I suppose you speak from the usual americentric POV. For the European countries, this notion of course makes no sense since WE are the autochtonous here.

If we consider the interracial question in the US, it doesn’t make more sense. You’re speaking as if the US were’nt already a lost cause.

Euro-descendants are a minority among births since 2016 (the date itself is a symbol) and this “we should/we’ll do” speech a way of assuming that white people control the game as a racial group with well-defined interests shared by all its members, which is obviously not the case.

1) Whites are on their way to become the largest minority in a northern Brazil utopia.

2) some Whites play against their team and shoudn’t then be considered in your demographic equation

3) good luck to convince DaShawn to retrieve his “verus wakanda” roots and leave the place, his EBT and his usual looting. Remember that most Blacks arrived in the US before most Whites (1849 gold rush, 1880’s) and they genuinely consider themselves as much Americans as you.
the better plan would be the creation of a new Haïti in the South and let the Dixieland Whites with the real black awareness go settle in the North-West, outbreed the local blue-haired blobs and begin something serious.

but we’ll know that won’t happen, because the US State has zero intention of changing its paradigm (brownies for growth) and is nowhere to collapse despite al the wishful thinking.

the US are a failed experiment of the Enlightment era about a social contract nation and the locals should -seriously – begin to think about the next step on the personal level and not “repair the nation” because otherwise, their descendants won’t resemble them at all.

[Oscar]

you cut my sentence, giving the impression I said there was in every general aspect no such thing as “truth”.

And of course age matters : it takes all the naive arrogance of the youth to imagine that the nearly twenty years I spent more than you in thinking, reading, practising counts for nothing.

At least, aside to illusions that you will change the core beliefs of highly prolific hardcore Christians (and more that there are a need for this non-happening change) It prevented me from spouting nonsense about so-called “medieval dysgenic christianity” (had you basic knowledge about the period, you would know that the food production could never have supported any major growth of the population) or that “crusades were made in the interest” of the chosenites (since you ignore it, the first act of the Crusaders when they captured Jerusalem was to slaughter most of the jews in the city)

I don’t think I’ll choose you as the master standard of what is interesting and adds to the quality of the debate.

[Oscar]

“Their best natures are corrputed by the nature of the system we live in”

and who, exactly creates this “system” if not the hoï polloï who avidly follow a dysfunctional and even suicidal organization as long as it grants them a few small material rewards and, above all, the moral comfort of being in the general movement.

you seem to live under the illusion that they are just big, pure-hearted naiveties.

No, they CHOOSE to be “deceived” for the aforementioned reasons and would not hesitate to deliver you to all the gay-stapos of the moment to stay in the Camp of Good.

you take the defense of people who would NEVER take yours in an opposite situation.

and you know why these people will never join your side? Because they understood the very “Catholic” nature of your reflexes

spoiler: there is no point in a person breaking out of the mainstream if you give them the option of being able to join you at the moment when they can maximize their opportunistic approach

my solidarity is exercised very exclusively towards people who share my struggle: I have been freed for a very long time from any reflex of solidarity with any of the idiots I meet in the street under the pretext that they have my phenotype (and I’m obviously not even talking about the others)

don’t forget that most were ready to deprive us of all social life for refusing to be injected with their Jewish juice.

any position other than intransigence will perhaps facilitate your social relations, but will always distance you further from the solution that you say you want to achieve.

and of course those who have bred with other races cannot be subject to any redemption, ever.

[Oscar]

““there is no such thing as “truth” ””

there is a thing far more objective and valuable than any point of view, it’s honesty (intellectual or other).

My exact phrase was : ” BECAUSE ON OPINIONS, there is no such thing as “truth”.

[Oscar]

“The side that is correct ”

spoiler alert : there is no “side that is correct” (or more factually there are both the two sides that are, because on opinions, there is no such thing as “truth”, only point of views

“These topics are somewhat important as they shape the future of White movements.”

sure, even”decisive”.. That must be why they happen with as much regularity as a woman’s periods, with as little procreation following them

As I’ve learnt by being politically involved when you were still shitting in your nappies.

[Oscar]

“I would advise any Christian ”

I doubt any believing and practising Christian would be intenrested in your tree-hugging revival as much as I doubt you’ll be interested in their babylonian-gone-jewish -inspired religion

This kind of eternally repeated discussion about religion reminds me of the movie “Groundhog Day”

The Christians are traditionalists : less than a theology, they are attached to memories, sensations, a conception of the world which they have inherited and it’s the tranmission to the next geneation which is the core of their attitude.

the neo-pagans are people who grew up in an environment which had already broken – at least in the previous generation – with this conception of the world to switch to modernism, then they tried to recreate a transcendence by aiming for the most radical approach possible.

they are two very distinct psychological types, in addition to different social backgrounds.

Trying to merge them because they objectively have common enemies makes no sense, and trying to make each side proselytize against the other doesn’t make any sense either.

[Oscar]

I may be wrong but if memory serves, the Orania project – visited by mandela – is protected under the constitution of the multi-racial state which stipulates that each ethno-cultural group has the right to maintain its specificities.

But keep in mind that Orania is nothing more than a big village and even if they are a lasting success because they avoided the mistakes of the apartheid regime (using the labour of Negroes), they are only a solution for themselves and not for all Euro-descendants in South Africa

On the other hand, I don’t think they are threatened in the strict sense of the word: if one day South Africa, totally niggerized, goes full Zimbabwe and hence sinks into total anarchy, the white cadres, especially in the security forces will separate themselves from the state apparatus and there, I don’t give much of the skin of baboons who would try to attack whites seasoned by “4 centuries together” (for Solzhenitsyn pastiche about the Jews)

anyway, to stick to the OP : why people are so obsessed by utopia nonsense ? OK the US and North America is a lost cause but if you really want to make a difference, just immigrate in the European country where your ancestors are from/

We can afford to lose outposts on others continents, but there is zero chances that the White race will survive if we don’t in our own cradle, Europe where we have still the numbers and the legitimacy of the autochtonous.

[Oscar]

“but I’ve spent money on tinder, hinge, another site”

so you’re telling us that you willingly spent (probably higher) money on the typical mainstream degenerate pro-race-mixing pro-fagottry dating sites (and obviously without result) but …

but here, on a militant site that tries to make exist what you say you want on a social level to happen, you’ve got the nerve to ask for a refund – something you’d never have tried to do on tinder and co (because you knew in advance that they’d give you the shits)

I’ve said it more than once, the (((system))) isn’t something external to us, it’s the degenerate and shitty part that exists to varying degrees in each of us.

With your consumer/Karen behaviour, whining for the price of a meal at your usual MacBurger, if I were a chick, I’d be running the other way.

look at you, boy in all your shinning glory.

[Oscar]

“@Oscar, I don’t think you understood that I was talking about reality, not ideology.”

ideology IS reality, the reality we want to happen. There is ZERO excuses for race-mixing. you are racially-consicous or you aren’t, there is no middle position on this.

and your double standard is just part of the problem : you can’t reasonably pretend to enforce moral dogmas on women if men are explicitly avoiding them – and women can use exactly the same excuses (ugly/unworthy white males

(btw a a White male having kids with an Asian woman will give his nationality of this progeniture. almost 100% of the mixed white-asian kids we had in France were the result of our single soldiers mating with local women in Indochina. when the father was killed or didn’t recognize the kid as him, they were put in special orphanages for mixed kids and when indochina felt… you have zero garantee they’ll just leave the genepool, quite the opposite, in reality.

[Oscar]

all this nonsense again ?

To put an end to these fantasies, I’m going to post a typical example of the demographic reality in these countries

Ukraine is a country at war. In a war, young men in their prime die. So, in theory, there should be plenty of women available for the remaining men. Well, what we see is that the demographic surplus of women that gives so many illusions to some is the exclusive result of the oldest women, i.e. those who cannot play any role in the birth rate. For women of child-bearing age, there are ALWAYS more men than women available, so there are no women theoretically available. Polygamy can therefore only be of theoretical interest for post-menopausal women, since they are actually outnumbered by the men in their age group. For all other categories, it’s an outright lie.

https://images.populationpyramid.net/capture/?selector=%23pyramid-share-container&url=https:%2F%2Fwww.populationpyramid.net/es/ucrania/2023/%3Fshare%3Dtrue

There is a simple and massive way of stimulating the white birth rate, and that is to ensure that the age of the first child is no longer 30, as has become the norm in Western countries. And that means working on attitudes (my mother’s generation had their children at a young age, whereas today it seems to have become a welfare queen thing) and practical measures concerning housing and crèches.

[Oscar]

“Unless you can promise a White man, a White wife that is more attractive than the (inevitably Asian) alternative, it is unrealistic to forbid White men from race-mixing”

I don’t even understand why you are on this site. Have you understood the concept ? BTW what’s this “i’m entitled to” mindset ?

people who race-mix, whatever the reason they claim, are the problem, period. I’ll alaways prefer the hypocrite Parisian bo-bos who claim their unconditionnal love for the universe but stay very endogamic to some mystery meat waving the tricolore and having some based instincts, because ultimately, the macronist prats are my kins. you can change your opnion, and facing with the harsh reality you will. you can’t change your DNA.

[Oscar]

according to the MP (and former presidential candidate Jean Lassale) macron has not been vaxxed and he could prove it if challenged

🔴#Macron #Vaccin Jean Lassalle revient sur la polémique et maintient ses propos

📢@jeanlassalle : "C'est la vérité absolue et à l'époque personne n'en disait rien ! Non, Macron n'a pas été vacciné et mes sources ont des preuves !

💻https://t.co/3yifH1U7cD pic.twitter.com/VHZBO1K0yR

— Sud Radio (@SudRadio) September 28, 2023

[Oscar]

since there is an intent on rehashing “COhen-daVID the revenge”

lethal stats based on British datas

[Oscar]

“where you sourced your information on medieval cohabitation” heard or read it in a doc, recently probably on France culture, roughly the equivalent of your NPR but specialized in arts sciences history and philosophy docs.

the finding was drawn from the notaries’ minute books, which, unlike the priests’ parish registers, recorded all contracts involving the division of property and communities of material interests. obviously this type of situation was more common in urban centres than in small rural communities.

I already knew from my history studies that the age of marriage was quite late in those days – all the more so if you take into account the much lower life expectancy. But I had always thought that the sexual question was regulated by the existence of brothels until people were in a position to start a family .

our problem is not that people are married or not ; our problem is that white people does not make enough babies.

I don’t believe in the story of a plot conceived from the outset to destroy marriage: it’s rather the sedimentation of multiple, seemingly minor decisions that produces the contemporary result

For example, financial support for women was introduced in response to the situation in the 1960s, when, unlike today, couples tended to break up on the initiative of men, leaving housewives with no professional experience to bring up children on their own.

But today this sedimentation is producing a legal situation that is intrinsically contrary to my interests, and I have no reason to support it just to fit in with a conservative clichéesque image of what the perfect society of 60 years ago might have been (it wasn’t, because it produced this situation).

you can live as a couple and have kids, and being really commited as the lifelong provider for them without being married. and I think that in this situation, it would be stupid to give a partner a right of control over the relationship that gives her a potential material interest in the case she wants to end it, especially since the prenups are of nzero valor since trampled by you own courts.

[Oscar]

Revolutions are never a mass phenomenom

It’s amusing to see that declared opponents of democracy are nevertheless generally imbued with the idea that change will come about if 50% of Europeans/Euro-descendants +1 switch to our ideas.

fundamental political movements are ALWAYS the work of an active minority, even if they sometimes hide behind the masses.

[Oscar]

what do you mean by “milking a profit”, clown ? you’re such a natural leech you imagine everything on earth is freebie and the site and technical support are paid by magic ?

BTW nobody even required you to pay, just not to act as a fraudster and not to circumvent the clear and repeated rules that forbid you to give your personal details on the site – both for obvious reasons of the financial survival of the site (it’s not likely to become profitable any day and therefore to last if everyone acts like an entitled cockroach like you) but also for the safety of the members themselves.

(yes you found me out : i’m a lemurian davosesque jew who’s going to suck your Aryan resistance’s brains out with my super eagle-beak nose)

i’m so tired of your kind of people all you talk about is the rule of law, tradition and honour, but these words are clearly only seen as export items. just a bunch of entitled albinos Shaniquas believing they’re the solution whereas they’re the problem.

[Oscar]

(BTW remove your personal datas, they are NOT authorized on the site and freeloading does not belong to the ethics of people who are supposed to support militant sites like this one

and It’ll avoid me of reporting you to Liv)

[Oscar]

“Yes just totally glaze over the part where our societies actively punish us for sticking to our racial guns as it were”

Today’s society does not launch investigations into your political sympathies, it ‘just’ prevents you from openly proclaiming a logic of racial – or even ethnic – affiliation if you are a European/Euro-descendant. So it’s up to each of us to take this into account by keeping our opinions for when we vote or for hidden activism.

I have to admit that I’m a bit fed up with seeing mentally retarded “sieg heil 88” (the phenomenon is largely an American case, since national legislation in Europe represses association with NS) using the political issue as a pretext for all kinds of professional failures and often for their white trash status.

the fact is that you can have a decent income to support a family without having to march in the gay pride parade or the I-lick-the-ass-of-saint-martin-luther-king day.

in any case, from a purely racial point of view, a woman has absolutely no interest in pairing up with a ‘based’ hillbilly rather than with a socially conformist white sheep from a simple point of view of evolutionary logic : better material security for her and offspring, better social perspectives.

i agree that women are over-promoted in relation to their abilities in the current context, and the phenomenon is undoubtedly stronger in the united states than in europe, where we are often a few years behind your putrefaction leval (except perhaps in the united kingdom, because common language), but there’s nothing to stop a man who doesn’t want to be swallowed up by the university system from cultivating professional talents in sectors that will provide him with a good income, and are free from any impregnation of nihilistic ideology: I don’t know if this is the case in the United States, but in France a self-employed plumber earns a very good living, and often more than many medium-sized white-collar jobs.

make a good living and make clear that she won’t have any right to your stuff if she leaves (in a word, don’t marry until you’re old enough to have her financial protection settled for when you croak.)

[Oscar]

” and demanded to “Man Up” to “Provide”.”

man has always had to provide, this is an anthropological invariant and the basis of our evolutionary strategy, so it’s not scandalous that a woman expects him to do so, on the other hand, in the traditional structure of marriage, it is :

1) the union of two equivalent heritages: marriage is a social and perfectly endogamous affair between two lineages sharing sociological and cultural reflexes designed to limit the inevitable friction of married life.

2) legally indissoluble.

the contemporary problem is that most women – including a large proportion of those who claim to have a political conscience – intend to preserve what remains of ‘traditional’ practices while adding the optimum ‘freedom of movement’ acquired by the consumerist individualism paradigm of industrial society.

We are in a period of transition between two systems, and it is reasonable to say that it is European man who is in the worst possible situation.

the solution is simply to extricate ourselves from the feminist mantra that we have to baide to current social schemes and operate by our own rules, because, basically, we can.

[Oscar]

adapt to the terrain when you can’t choose it : there is zero reason for a mn to marry in the current state of affairs fort the reasons you quoted, I won’t add anything to that

there’s no reason for a western man to get married: he can have access to women and start a family without that. some people will immediately trot out the pseudo argument of Tradition, but :

1) Tradition got us where we are today, so it’s not a panacea
2) most of those who gloss over this theme are totally unaware of what life was like for European societies in past centuries, which have been widely mythologised. Do they know that in the Middle Ages, cohabitation was at least as widespread as it is today? And that many people, for reasons of inheritance, did not marry until very late in life?

The “ancestral tradition” invoked today is largely a creation of the bourgeois industrial age.

the structure of marriage is fundamentally gynocratic, as it retains the legal and financial protections of the era when women were legal minors, while combining them with the contemporary principle of individualism.

What sense does it make to get married when even fags can do it? really? despite their frustration with the princess-day they’ve fantasised about since they were little girls, any woman with a political conscience can only agree with this – or else she’s looking for pretexts.

marriage will become necessary again when it has once more become the indissoluble union of two lineages, sanctified by society, not a ‘thing’ you have to have done, like a cruise to the Seychelles, to tell yourself that you haven’t missed out on your life as a good little post-western consumer.

in the meantime, he’s just one facet of the prevailing vaginocracy. no intelligent man can subscribe to this trap

[Oscar]

“So many users have been censored/banned for unknown/not-publicized reasons.”

How would you know ? I mean unless you’re here on mission “for some reason” with other guys you know IRL.

“The seemingly arbitrary nature of site administration has not inspired confidence”

funny all these self-claimed tough fascists who suddenly wants democracy when they don’t get their way, eh

“and in fact, reinforces speculation that this site is a honeypot.”

Fun fact : a very serious study of the University of Big-brained Nibbas of Wakanda has proved that 99% of internet people using the term “honeypot” about political-linked sites are themselves either ADL members or FBI glowniggers.

WD exists for years, the site does not need your validation.

As a former moderator of the site, I can confirm that the only people ejected from the site are:
1) non-Europeans/non-Euro-descendants who don’t belong here
2) political infiltrators/scam artists
3) people who endanger the site by overstepping the bounds of the very broad freedom of expression that the site already allows.

normally sociable people have never had any problems here, so it’s up to you to ask yourself the right questions.

[Oscar]

I’m as much unaware as you are bout TOR, since I don’t use it : from what I’ve understood, TOR is just uncensorable internet. I’m suree you’ll find tons of geeks who’ll explain that to you.

Don’t use the ‘dark net’ vocable it’s just Systemic narrative which wants to engrave in the heads of the plebs that anything it can’t censor is a breeding ground for paedos, terrorists and kidney merchants.

use the expression ‘uncensorable internet’ and you’ll be able to throw out in the discussion a few points without sounding like you’re giving a preach à la Fidel Castro.

protonmail is not politically-oriented so you can gradually trasnfer your social/business contact there.

i don’t think there is a financial structure that can be anything else than a subsidiary of the great jewish scheme of money/debt. just avoid the most openly Sorosian type

[Oscar]

” maybe there is a solid alternative out there, but I’m not aware of one.”

protonmail.com : crypted, based in Switzerland. There was an even better alternative ctemplar.com which, in addition of being crypted even used to refuse to cooperate with law enforcement but they never received enough financial support and ran out of business (and of course now people miss it)

for people who have already switched to TOR system, there is dnmx.org

anyway trash gmail as soon as you can: even my boomer Papa use it since he learnt how to do internet stuff after being retired two years ago don’t forget that every word you type on it – or that your correspondent type – is stocked somewhere for decades.

there is no real excuse to stay on obvious anti-White big business, especially when more neutral options already exist.

[Oscar]

“Just know that bugs can appear out of the blue after a simple plugin update ”

OK so in this case, the one I told you about may not have been around for that long.

“and for bearing with my rusty French.”

oh, toi tu cherches les compliments aujourd’hui 😉 tu sais bien qu’il est très bon et que tu n’as même presque pas d’accent.

[Oscar]

“If you are not interested then nobody is trying to sell you one it. ”

we are not discussing here individual preferences which are of little interest, we are discussing if polygamy is – or not – a viable alternative to the monogamous structure which happens to be the basis of Western civilization for centuries (a detail).

in case you didn’t make the effort to read the title of the group and the opening post : “Have you considered polygamy as a way to boost white birth rates?”

polygamy does NOT increase birth rate (and polygamy does NOT increase social stability, quite the opposite). if people fantazise about it and even practise it, it’s not a concern for me. In a time when bearded men can be “pregnant”, there are fmore worrying trends. Just don’t use pretexts of so-called political militantism for that.

[Oscar]

“as no real White Man would pee on the nest he is sitting in. ”

Alas Liv, you know that not the case, otherwise our respective societies throughout the West wouldn’t be all in this current state of decay.

you only have to look at the number of people who have absolutely no shame in using the site in a totally freeloader and parasitic way, indicating their private coords, just to benefit from the protected and cosy political environment, without ever considering that they have to contribute for this space to exist, as if in the end one could legitimately have the same attitude towards a small militant site as towards a multinational corporation.

the fact is that the “based” part (God, that expression is gay!) of public opinion in our various countries is no different in kind from the other segments of the population it claims to despise in the name of a higher political consciousness.

consumerism is king, and for many, “pro-white” is just a narcissistic sensibility waiting to find the best deal for their money (without, of course, ever worrying about yours or your time and efforts spent) more about a social project to be (re)built

This said, and we had this discussion in private recently, i STILL believe there are bugs on the site: apart from the example I gave you, there are some cases of strange interactions, clues that lead me to think of problems such as notification of new messages – with all the consequences that can have with people chatting et get to know each other. I’ve seen this with other people, so I think the problem exists.

[Oscar]

“that a single woman who marries young is capable of having 10 or more children ”

that was your typical French-Canadian family few decades ago (Céline dion : 14 siblings). And despite the neo-pagan anti-Christian bullshit narrative, it was the result of the important role of the christian religion (and I say that while being agnostic, only culturally catholic and of course not a big supporter of what the Church is becoming, espacially with the current pinko-commie Argie)

Could say the same for the Irish.

if it’s a question of boosting the white birth rate, polygamy is useless; if it’s a question of waging war on Christianity by reinventing a pseudo-tradition (exactly as the Jews did at the end of the 19th century, as I would note if I were being sarcastic), it’s a lot of effort for very little: christianism is dying.

Leonem mortuu, etima catuli morsicant (since we are in an ancestors’ revival, let’s play the full symphony right?)

[Oscar]

“Discovered even then, for some reason, they lie about ratios.
2022 men/women
US:
male 165 million
Female 168.3 million
3,244,880 More women than men.”

Perfect example of how quoting figures is useless if you can’t interpret them and put them into perspective rationally: I never said that there were fewer women in absolute terms in any country, I said that <b>there are naturally fewer women being born, which is a biological fact known and irrefutable to anyone who does a bit of demography : for 105 boys born, there are only 100 girls</b>

coonsidering that women’s life expectancy is higher than men’s – by three to four years on average, depending on the country – it’s obvious that in the total population stock, we’ll end up with more women, since the imbalance will increase in the oldest strata of the population: your extra 3 million are all those widows/catladies, certainly not fertile wombs.

I haven’t managed to get an answer to the simple question I was asking: considering that there are already naturally more men than women born, how can we imagine that artificially increasing this natural imbalance will in any way increase social stability – in addition to increasing the birth rate? it just doesn’t make any sense, it’s counter-factual and simply cargo cult.

[Oscar]

“Polygyny offers stability in an evergrowing unstable world. ”

opinions don’t become facts by the sheer force of wishful thinking.

all the facts, and logic, point in the opposite direction. How can we imagine that by creating an additional imbalance in the sexual supply – more men are naturally born than girls – we are contributing to social stability?

polygamy brings absolutely nothing in terms of social structure, and even less in terms of the white birth rate, since a man who disperses his material resources to several women will naturally have fewer children than a normal couple who decides to have a large number of offspring.

we’re not here to discuss people’s personal fantasies, but social structures in the context of the political situation in all European countries or countries populated by Eurodescendants.

as I said, two types of profile can afford this kind of fantasy: the very affluent, and the trailer-trash underclass.

It’s worth noting that most of the very rich who resort to de facto polygamy – a mistress – have limited offspring. They don’t contribute anything to the general birth rate, they do sterilize a resource.

I’m not even insisting on the fact that, given the nature of the current system, the most comfortable material positions – and therefore the most likely to attract women who accept polygamy – tend to be co-opted by pressure groups, none of which are good for us: Jews, fags, coloreds, not to mention crypto-lesbian feminists.

as for the latter, they produce genetic material that has no civilizational value: trailer trashes producing offspring with zero ability to be a part of a civilized, productive, technological society won’t save us from anything, quite the contrary.

[Oscar]

“Regardless, supporting restrictions on White male sexuality (with the exception of bringing non-Whites to White lands) is only detrimental to the pro-White cause. ”

you mean like polygamy ? Since some truths have to be repeated : the polygamy currently exists, and as in ancient times, it’s limited to people with not only material comfort but also symbolical status in our “société du spectacle”.

And i’m convinced that this world does not need more hollywood shiksas or NBA-stars coal burners.

[Oscar]

“Yes, Majority, of our white ancestors were polygynous ”

a fallacy doesn’t become a factual reasoning because you repeat it.

1) judaism didn’t influence Rome or Greece, it was the opposite (ever heard of the hellenistic kingdoms in the Levant ?

the only influence the jews had on Rome is that they pissed them so much than they destroyed jerusalem and expelled the annoying tribe (so we can enjoy their presence everywhere in Europe)

christianity is a religion that europeanized a levantine narrative (which wasn’t even hebraic at the beginning) : it’s main influence is the Romanitas
to assert that Christianism, which has structured all the social, cultural, political and even economic forms of the European peoples for more than a millennium, would be a form of foreign body having corrupted the pure soul of the peoples of Europe is a discourse of cardboard neo-pagans inventing a pseudo kitsch tradition whose sole aim is to fabricate a utopia in reverse, i.e. existing not in the future but in the past, which I call Whitekanda.
I’m not even saying this in defense of Christianism, which is dying in Europe, as I’m agnostic, but just out of respect for historical truth.

2)by definition, polygyny can’t be generalized even in a polygamic society : it’s a privilege of a small fringe of the male population, the most affluent.
So your project is to intitutionalize something that already exists in our societies : it’s called feminine hypergamy.
spoiler alert : modern-day concubines or second wives are called ‘mistresses’.

the polygamist rhetoric is just a pseudo-solution to the real problem of feminism. i note that the nasty monogamists have been solving the problem for a thousand years, and without trying to invent a false model that doesn’t add any value (a well-formed, solid couple will produce far more offspring in adulthood than their ancestors did, even if they were polygamous) and that can only produce social instability, since the sexual instinct is both powerful and shared by most men.

[Oscar]

” looks like USA is fast on its way to becoming another multiculti 5h!th0le like France?”

breaking news for you, Murica is ALREADY a multikulti shithole, and the shitholization of Europe is the result of its rampant americanization throught (((the medias))).

Nowhere in (non Anglo)Europe, you’ll find a colored as President/PM as the US had a decade ago and nowhere the non-White births are a majority (as they are in the US since 2016).

Add to that the impossibility of a nativist policy which would unite the relative still white majority.

I agree that there are more chances to succeed in Europe.

[Oscar]

“I see the concerted effort to erase culture and history, has been quite successful. ”

there’s a slight difference between tradition and Whitekanda pseudo ancestral bullshit.

“It was basically Jewish inspired Roman Catholicism that changed culture. ”

you have no clue. Ancient Judaism accepted polygyny. Romans, the civilization in which christianism was born, didn’t.

in any case, this discussion is so grotesque as to be humiliating.

Polygamy has no social interest in a society that does not suffer from a lack of men, as after a devastating conflict. On the contrary, given that naturally more men are born than women, the simple fact of concentrating even more of a scarce resource produces social imbalances: we talk enough about the case of these polygamous Mormons where young people are deprived of access to the marriage market.

the fact that there are still fewer women than men in our sector of opinion further increases, if possible, the totally counter-productive nature of this idea.

we are on a site where the ratio of male/female is an illustration of what it would look like, following this scheme. Brilliant, no?

I note that the people who are most radical about this kind of little delusion are often those who are at the bottom of the social ladder and who, in fact, would have absolutely no access to what they say they want most.

[Oscar]

“The turning point for me was the media hysteria over the “It’s OK to be white” flyers around 2015. I was baffled:”

a good reminder that <i>their</i> polarization always results in <i>our</i> own (classical memetic rivalty as analyzed by René Girard).

Our problem is not polarization, our problem is (our) people believing in a third way.

[Oscar]

general remark: ANY action movement with a claim to dissidence and a legal or semi-legal existence is bound to become infiltrated, if it isn’t already an empty envelope teleguided by the police services of the country in which you live.

It’s stupid and suicidal to associate yourself with any group whose name you can find on the Internet. End of aside.

[Oscar]

what do you mean by “financial engine” ?

[Oscar]

I just don’t see the point to leave your country to live in a non-White country where, even if your ever get the citizenship, wil always be be perceived as a foreigner by the locals (and rightly so) and will be be targetted if something goes wrong.

If you believe that Murica is a lost cause – and it is, for various reasons – then reclaim your European origins and get the citizenship of some European country. It will be easier, same conception of law and corruption, and you’ll blend in the locals in two generations

[Oscar]

L’accent, évidemment. Et quelques termes et formules copiés sur l’anglais (chum, gang, gun)

exemple : français de France : je suis tombé amoureux
français du Canada : je suis tombé en amour, copie exacte du “to fall in love” anglais

mais avec l’influence de la télévision et d’internet, on observe une certaine standardisation, avec un accent moins prononcé.

[Oscar]

1) there is no “uptick in fake profiles”. there always had some and when spotted, deleted.

2) help the admin with the report button when you have a reasonable doubt. Fill your report with all the hints you havethe profile will be under watch.

[Oscar]

J’en dis que tu ne choisis pas forcément le bon endroit.

[Oscar]

Healthy father of one, 41, died from a severe brain-bleed 11 days after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine

Adam Bounds, 41, died during brain surgery at Derriford Hospital in Plymouth
His death was caused by ‘vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia’
He was sick and lost consciousness as he suffered from a severe brain-bleed
The father-of-one received the AstraZeneca vaccine 11 days before his death

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10289703/Father-one-died-severe-brain-bleed-11-days-receiving-AstraZeneca-vaccine.html

[Oscar]

don’t kill yourself right away

it’s a basic principle of online dating and it just has to do with a basic principle of relationships between the sexes that is multiplied in its effects on the internet: female hypergamy

women tend to look for a partner who is naturally above their own intellectual, social and physical standards.

contrary to what we can hear from certain hysterical people of the mgtow type – who are a bit the masculinist version of blue-haired lesbians, this is not due to a just perverse and narcissistic nature of the woman but to a reproductive strategy which, some people forget too often, is separated for sexes in the human species.

a man can produce about fifty children in 10 days (with a little bit of vitamin C) a woman will have her reproductive capacity mobilised for a year – and even more considering the lack of autonomy of the newborn human being – when she has had intercourse. All of this leads to a much more advanced and multifactorial strategy in the woman to find the one with whom she will transmit her genetic capital.

this innate reflex of ruthless selection – and often quite unrealistic – is increased by the catalogue effect produced by any computerised classification system: each person starts from his or her fantasised vision of the perfect spouse and progressively eliminates those who do not correspond to each of the criteria of the composite profile: The system of items tends to dismantle any complex personality into a series of items whose combination is supposed to rationally produce the perfect match
This is what I call the American approach to the seduction relationship: it is a form of sentimental Taylorism which is probably not unrelated to the divorce rate in the United States (which is spreading its rotting model to the rest of the West).

We all know it instinctively: all the relationships we’ve had have never corresponded to the pre-established schema of the woman we imagined we’d like to meet, but nevertheless we don’t give up and we mechanically adopt this pseudo-rationalist approach when we go on one of these sites

Why do I support White Date since its creation while I am fundamentally against the principle of online sites?

Well, it’s a simple reasoning: I know that internet dating is a flawed system but it is the main way of dating today.

Moreover, this site is focused on a criterion that is essential in my eyes: the fact of having a life partner who has the same view of the world: one of our writers summed it up well “true love is not looking at each other but looking together in the same direction” take this site for what it is: one more way to achieve what you are looking for, don’t expect more than it can give you. your best chance of meeting someone is still your job or your circle of friends

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

That is, after all, the book the majority of white people wish to use as their moral Constitution.

No.

Especially in Europe.

You clearly didn’t read my initial response to the OP in which I explicitly state that I do not intend to seek a polygamous marriage for myself

I know to read. A PhD usually helps in this kind of occupation

We were not discussing your personal situation but the utility – or not – of this theoritical situation

this kind of totally out-of-reality discussion would be the perfect illustration for a leftist observer of a certain variety of clownish-radicalism that tends to be more extreme as it losses all means to weigh on reality.

You do realize that having upwards of 6-10 kids/family was considerably more common in the past?

Yes with one woman. And I don’t even speak of many French Canadians who used to have ten of them (Céline Dion’s 13 siblings)

So, what the point of having 3 wives ? To have 50 kids whose you won’t remember the name of the date of birthday. and since modern days conditions – and I don’t even speak about being a follower of the consumerist neurosis – makes that impossible except if you aspire to some trailer trash life, what’s the point of this kind of fantasies presented as “an hypothesis that has to be discussed”

there is a – quite pathetic – tendency among some people, as civilizational decomposition accelerates, to manufacture a junk radicalism that seems to follow in parallel exactly the trend of blue-haired clique.

if we leave it a few more years, i’m sure we’ll read about a return to the clan, to drink mead in an aurochs horn and to clothes made of animal fur. To become a herd of paranoid and incantatory hillbillies what a great gift to the (((system)))

Reality check: most of them will never manage to find a companion who is not a consumerist half-whore with a brain eaten by the system and whose comprehension of the world will be organised around the concepts of “muh weemen rights, muh liberty, muh fulfilment”, so to imagine finding three of them, how can I say…

Turks are at the gates and you’re discussing about sexual transition of angels

I repeat myself : we are not an endangered species, our Weltanschauung is, we just need to create moderately prolific families with, above all, an excellent intellectual and political training and the creation of a relational environment that allows these efforts to be prolonged (in other words, to have one’s children evolve in a friendly and sentimental environment where they will be with children whose parents have the same convictions, which will avoid the deleterious effect sent out by the usual social environment), and this is not possible with a short period of time spent with each of our children.

this said, have fun in chatting.

[Oscar]

Husband says his wife, 51, died a ‘hero’ as coroner rules she was killed by blood clots caused by AstraZeneca Covid vaccine 16 days after getting the jab

Michelle Barlow, 51, died 16 days after her March 7 jab from severe blood clots
The mother-of-two from Orrell, near Wigan, died after three days in hospital
Her husband said she was ‘fobbed off’ during her first hospital visit on March 19
But she returned a day later and was admitted to A&E before dying on March 22

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10247179/Husband-says-wife-51-died-hero-blood-clots-caused-AstraZeneca-vaccine.html

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

Green agenda :

[Oscar]

@Liv : ça marche aussi avec le blanc à la place du jaune 😉

[Oscar]

Canaduh : a 52 years old Indian cardiologist who used to say to the non-vaxxed “I wont cry at your funerals” dies two weeks after his 3rd jab.

Dr.Sohrab Lutchmedial, 52 ans, cardiologue can., sportif et sans antécédents méd. est mort subitement hier.

Il a eu sa 3e dose le 24 oct.'21

« Je ne pleurerai pas à vos funérailles », disait-il à ceux qui ne veulent pas du vaccin..

Excellent article 👇
https://t.co/sUh4Fsi1An

— TIGER⚜ (@Steve_Tiger1) November 10, 2021

curry lol.

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

she made a nice troll about the Gilets jaunes crisis on a 70’s tune

Marguerite et les circonstances – Les gentils, les méchants – 2019

and I discovered she made nice fresh songs (right in the thema 🙂

https://youtu.be/Di4c0m6jnrQ

Marguerite et les circonstances – Baby bop, baby blues – 2017

[Oscar]

@natcolio : I received a notification about an answer by you but nothing on the screen

[Oscar]

I chose the term ‘movement’ because it was the closest to the original term ‘mouvance’, i.e. a gathering of people of the same ideological sensibility. the periphrase itself would not be satisfactory because the people here are defined more by the common refusal of the current order than by identical views and solutions.

and if the people you talk to don’t look at you strangely when you go off on a rant about establishing a polygamous system à la Conan the barbarian, it’s probably because you don’t meet many normies anymore.

Of course, it’s a numbers game, it’s always a numbers game, it’s just that it’s not purely a numbers game on a racial level.

i’m repeating myself because some people didn’t seem to get it: producing more white children is not in itself of any interest if you’re generating blue-haired kids and other mental niggers that will only increase the numerical volume of our enemies.

the idea that you are in a material as well as a moral position to generate enough children on an individual scale to reverse a general and multiform process is silly. of course you have to have children and even make a few more than the average to compensate for all those old catladies who will remain sterile, but that’s not the point. A more immediate and tangible result can be achieved by acting with and on the compatriots who already exist than by fantasising about new Adam who’ll get both Eve and Lilith to recreate their own little perfect humanity (and that the billions of individuals around them will just comply and disappear).

in the modern world, it is already difficult enough to find ONE companion who satisfies our character, our life plans and our Weltanschauung, not to fantasize that we are going to find two at once and live like in the perfect Disney. yes, we can theoretically discuss everything, but i still think it would be good to be satisfied with things that have a connection with practical reality

chet nick : I saw absolutely no connection between what you wrote and the message I had formulated. Perhaps if you had put less energy into tracking down my possible syntax errors in a foreign language, you could have worked on this logical link.

[Oscar]

with all due respect, these lunar and somewhat childish debates are the perfect illustration of why the movement is often seen by normie sheep as a den of freaks and therefore avoids dealing with them.

we are not an endangered group that should be securing the immediate means to increase its gene pool by a factor of 10. there have never been so many people of european descent in history. what we are facing is the irruption of outsiders who, supported by our establishment, will one day be in a position – less quickly in europe than in the new world – to prevent us from exercising political control over our own countries in accordance with what we believe to be our interests and the preservation of our identity.

It is therefore a question of at least maintaining the replacement of the age groups AND of raising the rising generations as citizens conscious of their duties towards the ethnic and cultural heritage of the society in which they were born. Laying down dozens of children as Africans or Afghans do is of no interest whatsoever if they end up dyeing their hair blue and becoming mental niggers

a form of relative polygamy has always existed, it was the fact that a man had a – or several – mistress(es). this was the result of a double factor: the existence in the natural state of more women than men – a phenomenon accentuated by the constant state of war – and on the other hand by the phenomenon of female hypergamy (the fact that women very generally aim for a spouse superior to their own level and that some prefer the status of a partial companion to a man with a higher status than a full-time spouse, but judged to be of inferior rank)

for all that, there is nothing in our anthropological substratum that pushes us towards official polygamy, and it has no vital interest in demographic terms: a woman can bear more children than you will be able to raise properly (I stress the term)

so it’s a pointless debate, because it’s pointless and makes you look like half-demented.

Mes 02 centimes d’€uro.

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

an excellent site with a compilation of deaths and other consequences from jabs

Home

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

[Oscar]

@itsnatural : although Rameau is not obscure, he’s total baroque. Murica as seen from Versailles, 1735. The piece was a reference to the visit by the chief Chicagou ten years earlier to pledge allegiance to Louis XV and to recognize his sovereignity over the Great Lakes area. I particulary appreciate this colorful rendition. I suppose the choice of costumes would be just impossible in CancelUS so, enjoy

XIV – Jean-Philippe Rameau – France – Les Indes galantes (Les sauvages – Rondeau) – 1735 – Patricia Petibon/Nicolas Rivencq, dir. William Christie

[Oscar]

and then I suppose you can use that new email and sign up for your new youtube account at the local library, that would solve the device tracking problem

it was so simple that I didn’t even had the idea. Thanks, Chris.

They’re not letting you create a new gmail account?

that wasn’t my point. jewmail has to be blacklisted by anybody with his sane mind. even protonmail is not that private since swiss authorities have to comply with EU judicial assistance requests. ctemplar.com is the sole mail that i know with full privacy.

[Oscar]

I mean death included within official surveys, or testimonies like the OP (very rare for of ilness that appeared less than two weeks after getting the jab, no ” he died of a heart attack at 65 a month after being vaccinated so it must be related” thing.

Using not blatant and indisputable proofs are the best way to maintain deniers in their delusion and evasive rhetoric tactics.

[Oscar]

This about _donating_ to new parents. I wonder if it could be done in a more organised way:

why complicate what already exists you can easily make a donation to the site for this purpose

(lol, just realising that Denmark doesn’t use €uro. Anyway i suppose it’s easier to you you to deal with it than to the yanks who have also to trade here with this currency)

[Oscar]

Why is it non-paying members can’t privately message in the first place? This is a dating site, privately messaging is kind of critical to its function.

what is it that the cashier ask me for money at the supermarket ? I mean, it’s a place with food stocked and I’m hungry so I should could eat if I want/need it, since food is a basic human need, right ?

The sense of entitlement of some still astonishes me, especially in a place where some embryo of political consciousness is supposed to have sprouted.

I’m sure 100% of you spend money on things that don’t really matter and that fatten up the big corporations of the (((System))). and then, curiously, you don’t ask yourself whether you ‘want’ to give your money to global corporations that will use it to serve you beautiful advertisements of rainbow families and coalburners in bloom.
But if you come across a small site that matches the vision you say is central to your life, a site that is struggling against all odds, especially the conspiracy of silence to stifle it, then, instead of helping out, you’re going to haggle more easily than an Arab in a carpet shop.

Our problem is clearly not only demographic. It is also – and probably primarily – that many whites now are acting like blacks.

Behave, gentlemen.

[Oscar]

XIII – Richard Wagner – Deutschland – Rienzi (Ouvertüre) – 1842

[Oscar]

I say, men getting into there late 40s should stay out of the breeding game,

Men of that age will probably study your opinion with all the care it deserves, and then make their own choice, as did my maternal great- and grand-fathers who had children at that age, all perfectly healthy, and without whom I would not be here to discuss it.

The idea that male and female fertility can be associated in a parallel scheme, and thus project onto one the medical problems recognised in the others, is pure nonsense

Had you taken care to read your own links, you would have seen that the first one is nothing but a fertility business that is there to convince you to pay him a lot of shekels to protect you from a rather imaginary risk.

the first of the arguments they cite is that the risk of a child with an older father being malformed increases because …. these guys are most often with older women.

There is a whole crypto-feminist discourse aimed at, if not denying, at least eroding a little bit, this fundamental inequality: men do not have menopause.

and from your second source – which is a real scientific study :

Over the age group we found an increase from 0.2 to 0.4 percent in the frequencies of diploidy

it’s the same than saying you should be mandatory-vaxxed because of risk to die from the chink batvirus when you’re 20.

The main argument with older parents is that they won’t have the same the only real argument against older parents is that they won’t have the dynamism that younger parents would have, which means that there is a different relationship, with disadvantages but also advantages.

no configuration is ideal, contrary to what some people seem to think, and anyway parenthood is not breeding labradors.

(even if labradors are cool)

[Oscar]

The sheer number of views I get on POF… I can only assume they never make it past my first paragraph

maybe it’s not that smart to begin some interaction with anybody with a rant about the vax ?

What are your chances of convincing anyone with a vague paragraph on a dating site profile – where women are over-stimulated because they are outnumbered, completely at odds with biological reality – a paragraph that goes totally against the grain of all the social validation systems (media, authorities, friends) that this person has been facing in everyday life for almost two years now?

None, right? So why do it? Probably because like many people, you prefer to please yourself by voicing your opinions than to convince opponents whose opinions you can with a little subtlety change – many of which are simply social conformity.

women are biologically more inclined to follow social conformity. this has nothing to do with lower intelligence as some grotesque incels think, but simply because their biology conditions them to a stronger importance of the group for their own survival.

However, if a woman can find the conditions of her own security in another environment, including one that is in opposition to the prevailing dogma, then she will do so – the woman naturally considers situations from a material and pragmatic point of view rather than a theoretical one: this is again an effect of her biology (fatherhood is a simple concept for a man, it is a lot of pain for a woman). I have never seen a woman refuse to change her views when it was consistent with her perception that adhering to a new point of view would increase her security and that of her offspring – existing or future.

[Oscar]

Side note, our race is not being out bred, look up the stats

In no White countries is the number of (native) births at least equal to the replacement level. We ARE in a phase of extinction, slow, it is true, but still extinction that is added to a second phenomenon called to have an even more rapid impact: the presence of non-natives on our own soil

[Oscar]

XII – Henry Purcell – England – Funeral sentences and Music for the death of the Queen Mary (March) – Z.860 – 1695

[Oscar]

Requin chagrin – Mauvais présage – 2019

[Author]

Posts