Forum Replies Created
-
@Ted I agree with you.
Aside from the fact he “gave up” his DNA it has been illuminating, refreshing, to know we are 100% European stock.
At least know the one relative wasn’t Native American.@Hunter Sadly white children are inundated with race mixing.
I’m of firm belief No whites should put children in public schools. If I knew I’m 1990’s what I knew now mine never would have.What little time one has with children at home will never overcome all the hours of brainwashing schools impose on their young impressionable minds. Then there is the media, advertising, peer pressure…..
Walked in Walmart 2 days ago and it was everywhere.
Air mattresses, tents, pop up canopies all showed mixed race couples on the boxes. I was so mad I had to take pictures of the mind manipulating changes.
(There was 1 that showed white people, but I know that one had been there for a while.)I guess we could always go back to the egalitarian “tribal” ways.
While we sit here a ponder the ethics the other side is making full use of “polygyny” to wife up as many white woman as possible.
Haven’t been on Facebook in ages.
Looked today and feed is disgusting.Several black men with multiple white, and pregnant, wives. One Claiming (showing) 8 wives total, and scores of children.
If have a Facebook, look up “Yahweh Yahweh” (queen Yahweh), #propolygyny, or #multiplewives, or “king Yahweh”. That’s just one of many. All black.
They are taking out our gene pool, and getting invited to the White House to receive lifetime achievement awards.
This supposed “king Yahweh” who claims kingship of Ghana is repudiated by the Ghanaians themselves as they are a republic, I digress.Someone who born in US, with multiple homes in US, openly flaunting multiple wives, being invited to the White House should put those of us of European descent on notice we need to quit debating and grow up.
@spartan
Don’t know what world you live in, but the mud sharking in my area is off the charts.I know several, what would be called, beautiful women, I had interest in until I saw they had mudsharked. Kinky Hair kids hair flying every which direction.
Saw another today. It’s like an epidemic, and I’m not really attracted to other than white women, but I’d rather wife up an Asian, or light skinned Mexican as to wife up a white woman who went mud shark even if no child resulted from it.
In my youth I Went out with Native American woman ONCE. Wasn’t my cup of tea.
One of my coworkers has wifed up a mud shark with 2 interacial kids, ones part African, and no idea what the other is cause neither African, or white. 😞I did in-depth population study years ago.
Discovered even then, for some reason, they lie about ratios.
2022 men/women
US:
male 165 million
Female 168.3 million
3,244,880 More women than men.Canada:
Male 19.35 million
Female 19.6 million
236,585 more women than men.Mexico male population 62.2 million
Female 65.3 million
3 million more women.It would be best to study why Utah gave women right to vote in 1870 then revoked it in 1887. Women weren’t voting against polygyny as was hoped.
Second would be why there was such a concerted effort to stop polygyny in the US.
(To paraphrase quote, “if allowed to continue there will be such a large voting blocks as result of so many children listening to grandfathers, based on family ties the polygynists would rule the elections, and after a few generations would be to powerful [cause of the numerous children] to control!”)History proves most current cult/ural claims against it to be misleading.
Oscar, you act like those are my statements.
They are not.
Quote in early Christianity: “Many of them were Essenes, who believed in celibacy. They simply could not replace their numbers from within or without. And it probably would have died out if not for a man named Paul of Tarsus…..
Paul went out to sell this to the pagan world. And there was no better salesman than he.He had an enormously receptive audience because he was selling the moral dream of Judaism – love, fairness, honesty, monotheism (albeit imperfect monotheism; it was certainly monotheistic in comparison to the Roman theologies of the time). He was also selling the coming redemption of the world. The early Christians believed that the “Second Coming” of Jesus was imminent.”
The Roman Empire, which had reigned supreme for almost 300 years and been in existence almost 500, started to DECLINE.……
One of the MAIN REASONS WAS CHRISTIANITY. Rome was not strong enough — or able enough or ruthless enough — to destroy the Christians. Yet, in persecuting them they guaranteed their popularity among the downtrodden.” End quote.Who is responsible for current anti-white agenda now?
Who was responsible for the “War against Germans?…….
Who was responsible for Great Depression?
Who was responsible for spread of Christianity weakening Rome?
Original Christianity never banned polygyny.
That came later.
I’d suggest doing a deep dive of entomology of “agape.” Agape didn’t mean platonic.Flavius Josephus was an infiltrator in my book, just like many others.
I find it too much to be coincidental that the pope’s edicts (bans) on polygyny coincided with Rabbeinu Gershom, a renowned French talmudist, bans on polygyny circa 1,000.
Since its appearant so few are aware of the culture stolen thought I’d post a couple snippets:
“Normative practices of Polygyny and concubinage, which have been shown by anthropological studies to legitimize behaviours that reinforce male power. Our survey found that many of these behaviours have been prevalent among Viking-Age societies.”
“A range of evidence indicates that Viking-Age Scandinavian societies practised both polygyny, meaning that men could take multiple wives, and concubinage – a semi-formal relationship in which men and women engage in sexual activity and sometimes cohabit without marrying. These practices could be simultaneous (i.e. a man could have both one or more wives and one or more concubines) but are distinct from one another and will be treated as such below.”
(Polygyny, Concubinage, and the Social Lives of Women in Viking-Age Scandinavia
Ben Raffield, Neil Price, and Mark Collard
Introduction: (Un)tangling Viking-Age Social Relations)“It may have become clear that the concept of polygyny proposed in this book differs from Reichert’s in all essential respects. I am going to argue that polygyny is not a form of marriage, but marriage can be a form of relationship within overall polygyny;34”
(All the King’s Women
Polygyny and Politics in Europe, 900–1250 By
Jan Rüdiger)“ Greco-Roman SIUM was preserved and gradually reinforced by the Christian church
which Labored TO SUPPRESS POLYGYNY among GERMANS and SLAVS at a time when the Arab conquests lent ideological support to polygamy in parts of the Mediterranean and across the Middle East. The Middle Ages, as SIUM spread as a by-product of Christianization, witnessed the church’s struggle against divorce and elite concubinage, practices whose curtailment would render monogamous precepts more effective.
26 Ashkenazi Jewry followed this trend, highlighted by Gershom ben Judah’s ban”
(Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Monogamy and polygyny in Greece, Rome, and world history)End snippets:
Now was Rome really monogamous when men were allowed to have concubines, sex with their slaves etc?
NO!Those today who consider polygyny grotesque have no such animosity for “serial monogamy,” or a serial divorce’ when it is actually worse, for at least those of old were mostly loyal, and faithful.
Serial divorces are fine. Sleeping with a different person every week, but somehow more than one woman being faithful to one man is sick?How twisted is such reasoning? Shows the truth of my previous post).
One more snippet:
“ and perhaps for the first time in recorded history, society at large is happy to celebrate both, as witnessed in countless pop songs, novels, films, rv serials, sociology reports and newspaper analyses. Yet in most of its cultural representations, satyria-sis is at an uncomfortable angle to some other central tenets of cultural self-imaging. However easily partners may switch in film, television, and life, for as long as they last, ‘couple’ relationships are supposed to be exclusive, and if they are not (which is often), we readily apply to them a near-feudal vocabulary of loyalty and betrayal. “I’lI be true to you, yes I will,” fidelis ero tibi, is the formula straight out of a twelfth-century charter as sung by the Hollies.”
End:Yes, Majority, of our white ancestors were polygynous before Jewish inspired Christianity crushed, and destroyed our cultural traditions, and history.
Oscar, being honest for your benefit, you are a victim of mind control as shown by your choice of words.
Psychological warfare works unless you know how to protect yourself from it.I’ll Let some of those in the know state it loudly.
“We are governed, our minds are MOLDED, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”Edward Bernays
“The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that MIND IS MADE UP FOR IT BY THE GROUP LEADERS IN WHOM IT BELIEVES and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. It is composed of INHERITED PREJUDICES and SYMBOLS and CLICHES and VERBAL FORMULAS supplied to them by the leaders.”Read your own reply to me, and look at world around you, and how you align with it realize the truth of those statements.
I’m not going to right a book to connect the dots so just know Every choice given, but truth, is controlled opposition by same the same groups.
Learn. Although rather advanced “Rape of The Human Mind; Joost Meerloo is rather decent, one to start with.
Than Propaganda, by Edward bernays.
Then, then, then……
See what I mean.Had look up dates.
I was a little off on timeline.
Basically enforced monogamy started in the early Middle Ages, enforced by catholic torture
Posting for historical only.http://www.patriarchywebsite.com/monogamy/mono-history.htm
Excerpts:
In 726AD, it was acceptable for a man with a sick wife to take a second wife so long as he looked after the first one. With concerns for protecting Church property from inheritance however, offspring could not inherit church property and it was later declared that all sons of priests were illegitimate. In 1022, Pope Benedict VIII banned marriages for priests (monogamous or polygamous). Finally in 1139, Pope Innocent II voided all marriages of priests and all new priests had to divorce their wives. All these were done to possess and protect money and church property. Making polygamy a sin and marriage unacceptable for a priest was a slow and purposeful process.
The idea of Catholic celibacy is especially foolish when you realize the reason behind it. Before the middle ages it was allowable for Catholic priests to have multiple wives and mistresses (concubines). But with concerns for protecting Church property from inheritance Pope Pelagius I made new priests agree offspring could not inherit Church property. Pope Gregory then declared all sons of priests illegitimate (only sons since lowly daughters could not inherit anyway in society).
In 1022 Pope Benedict VIII banned marriages and mistresses for priests and in 1139 Pope Innocent II voided all marriages of priests and all new priests had to divorce their wives. This had nothing to do with morality, multiple women for males had long been the norm since before biblical times, but it was about MONEY! In biblical times many wives, concubines and breeders was common and never spoken against other than by Paul to the Elders of Timothy and Titus. In the Tanakh, Jewish priests suggest 4 wives was probably about the right number.
End!
It was basically Jewish inspired Roman Catholicism that changed culture.
How can those of us of Euro descent honor, or follow a religion based on a people who are openly calling for the extermination of the “white race?”
Although Christianity is more pagan than Judaic it is based on a genocidic subservience to a religious cult who wants to eradicate us.I’ve helped someone escape cult programming. Takes lot of time and effort.
What I mean by “is more pagan:”
In my journey I discovered the Bible was basically rewritten with pagan names of deities to gain acceptance of the people. (don’t know if still have the book) majority of words (holy, Easter, the word God, word faith, grace etc, etc. and Christian holidays are pagan in origin.As Hunter mentioned Constantine: who was looking for a way to bond together his empire he incorporated pagan ideologies and gods into judiac Christianity.
A few examples:
Christmas/Yule; those who have studied history admit if Jesus were born he had to have been born around September.Easter:
Based off festivals to “Ēostre (Proto-Germanic: *Austrō(n)) is a West Germanic spring goddess.”Grace: Greek Charis or plural Charites, Latin Gratia, in Greek religion, one of a group of goddesses of fertility.
Hard part can be getting through to people without them turning violent.
I’ve had more than one on verge of going berserk.
Have had some push me on why I don’t believe Isaiah chapter 7 was a prophecy of Jesus or virgin birth.
Reasoning out that Ahaz didn’t have “faith” thus the reason for a sign for ahaz to see and know.
Not something that takes place 800 years later.It brings them face to face with Thor own cognitive dissonance, and they have a tendency to want to attack the one who took them by the hand and walked them to that point even though they asked for it.
It can get past that point without violence there’s a chance to open their eyes even further.
Replying to wolfs #14222.
If we consider knowledge by blood, or “Blood memory is the thoughts, feelings, and wisdom of the ancestors of one’s own specific culture, totem, or clan,” then the experience and knowledge of the older wiser male would by default carry to the children.Take my family.
I said I would be something different but was drawn to the trades.I just knew how to do some things, not because I was taught, but because it was in the blood I.e even if I had never done something i could figure out how to do so. If I wanted to.
Maternal Grandfather had studied, and got certified in carpentry, auto mechanics, refrigeration, welding etc. also did leather work. there was literally nothing he couldn’t do.
He made his own vehicle disabling anti-theft device, and alarm in the early 1970’s.My Father was the same.
I ended up finding myself drawn to carpentry, have worked as auto machinist, small engine repair, and mechanic without formal training.
Most seemed to just come naturally.
A passion of mine is making buckskin, and own clothes from it. love of which derived from grandfather telling me how it was made, watching him do leather work.
Now, even though, due to my early bad choice in a spouse my son was moved to other side of country, and kept from me yet as side job evenings and weekends he does carpentry and mechanical work because he enjoys it. Love, and knowledge of which could only be said to come from blood knowledge, that is it’s in the genes.
At one time older men were sought out, and they had to prove themselves eligible through experience.
Basically experience of man is carried over.
Ageism; discrimination by age: only came about in approximately last 60 years.
My step dads mother and father were 18 years age difference.
My EX wife’s mother and father were 20 years age difference.Older people I knew growing up were up to 30 years difference in age.
Their ideal was the man went to work and bought land, built a house to show he would/could be a good provider, and protector then he went looking for a wife.
By said time he had 8+ years without a family to prove he could, and would work to provide income, and build a nest egg.With todays ageism where not “supposed” to be more than couple years difference in age is one reason so many relationships fail.
There is no nest egg. Couples fight over money. Man hasn’t proven he can make it through the trials etc.
I got a wife at young age, BUT I had already been working for 7 years, and on my own for 4 years.
Also when times get tough how resourceful is the man?!
Ended up bit long, but trying to at least touch on some of the salient points.
Good discussion.
I think the white “religion” should be one of natural concrete truth, instead of abstract truth.English is an abstract language, faith, belief, holy are abstract terms, and misinterpretations of a concrete language, which I believe also puts us at a disadvantage against those who wish to eradicate us. To better exemplify I must use an example from ancient Hebrew site.
Quote: The Hebrew word for faith is אמונה (emunah – Strong’s #530) and is an action oriented word meaning “support”. This is important because the Western concept of faith places the action on the one you have faith in, such as “faith in God”. But, the Hebrew word אמונה places the action on the one who “supports God”. It is not a knowing that God will act, but rather I will do what I can to support God. This idea of support for the word emunah can be seen in Exodus 17:12.
But Moses’ hands grew weary; so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat upon it, and Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side; so his hands wer and the other on the other side; so his hands were steady (emunah)until the going down of the sun.It is the support/emunah of Aaron and Hur that held of Moses’ arms, not the support/emunah of Moses. When we say “I have faith in God”, we should be thinking “I will do what I can to support God”.end quote.
So we see “faith” is an action word that in original language puts Emphasis on actions of the follower rather than actions on the deity. This is why we see those attempting to eradicate our race taking positions of power to bring to fruition that which they deem to be prophecy of their creator; because Hebrew language is an action based concrete language which places weight of responsibility on the follower to bring about that which they feel is promised to them .
A more accurate English way to state word interpreted as “faith” would be “goal, and all actions of yourself and support given to you from those close to you (your people) to achieve that goal.”
Compare it to Christianity which states “you must pray, and wait upon the lord, and he will give it to you if you are worthy.
(Whereas in hebrew it would be, “if you are worthy you will make it happen for The lord.)
Leading to a Christians disconnecting from the higher power by waiting, and expecting everything it to be handed to them “someday” if he deems you worthy.I disagree with Christianity’s “facts”, and believe misunderstanding it can actually disconnect someone from the “divine” but if it helps someone overcome a hurdle, and they don’t push it on others I have no problem with them.
I Was raised “Christian” and went to church 2-3 times a week.
There is lot of wisdom, and history in the Bible.
Is Christianity for us, the white race?
Perhaps a better question, “is it for any who seek truth with reason?” It is stated in Old Testament, “come. Let us reason together:” which to me states we should use reason and logic to find the truth, as it is also written, “stand ye and the crossroads, and consider the old paths and walk ye therein.” BUT one need learn And UnderStand them by serious consideration.
Only by truly seeking will one know.Experiences have taught me there is something we don’t understand.
(I am not trying to challenge the Gods/The Divine/Spirit or however one chooses to recognize such.)With that said:
Why I no longer follow Christianity is because of the Old Testament. (Modern Christians don’t even follow the New Testament or they wouldn’t be getting interest loans, and we wouldn’t need a welfare system…) Also the virgin, resurrection thing is much older than Christianity. One is Mithras born of virgin, 12 disciples (12 main signs of zodiac) and died on a cross.If Christianity was the fulfillment of the Old Testament, it should prove the New Testament, but it doesn’t.
In the Old Testament it is written more than once that “no man may die to forgive sins of another, as each is responsible for his own.”Human sacrifice was forbidden.
Also Old Testament gives other examples besides the shedding of blood for forgiveness: ephah of flour; contrite heart etc.
Is also written “each man should seek his own salvation with “”fear (fear being misinterpretation)”” Which to me states it may not be same path for each.
One experience I will share.
I stood and watched a tornado forming over me.
I wasn’t afraid. I was confident in myself. I watched to see which way it would go.
When it kept coming straight for me I thought “I’ll run north” instant I thought it the funnel moved to block me.
“I’ll run south” same thing happened.I realized there was no running to avoid it. While standing there, with trees bowing form force of the wind, limbs breaking, and it about 20 feet a time I let go, and thought, “Creator, If you want me I won’t run from you. I’m here. I’m ready to go, if you want to take me.”
The second I projected that thought the wind ceased and the tornado literally went into reverse. I stood for a while in pouring rain thinking about it. It was a bit of an awakening.
To this day it still amazes me.
